User talk:Critic11

Notability of Maria tatar

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Maria tatar, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Maria tatar seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Maria tatar, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

edgeworth

Are you by any chance planning to do all of her stories? Let me know, because I have actually read all of them in the Collected Works,, and I know at least one of the probably 10 other people who have also. I have however removed your link to the Purple Jar from the menstruation article, because if it was a theme, it was almost certainly an unconscious one. The link should only be for stories that are truly characteristic or emblematic or path-breaking & have sources to show it. I don't see a source at all in the Purple Jar--no doubt there is one, but unlessits a standard example it still shouldn't get a link from the general article. DGG (talk) 01:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edith Wharton's The Custom of the Country

You can't just add a piece of scholarship and give a list of books as a reference. You'd have to give the page number from a book with the author's name, place and year of publication, etc. Just like an academic paper.Zigzig20s (talk) 10:49, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:RobertRBowie.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:RobertRBowie.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Zubis rises.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY (TALK) 20:11, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Critic11. Sorry, but, I'm not sure what you meant by that. I'd be happy to help you out here but I'm going to need some clarification. Regards, FASTILY (TALK) 20:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I can definitely help with that. But first I need to know how (through what venue - e.g. email) the author/copyright owner has given you permission to put the image up on Wikipedia. -FASTILY (TALK) 20:53, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And perhaps how the permissions are detailed. -FASTILY (TALK) 20:54, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, well, this email's permissions aren't exactly what is required for the image to be kept on Wikipedia without being deleted but for a first timer to WP:OTRS, you're doing a great job! This system is used to manage email permissions in which the copyright holders/authors of files have granted permission to users of Wikimedia projects (presumably en.wikipedia in this case) to upload the works of the copyright holders/authors of files. Emails with permissions from the copyright holder/authors must be sent/forwarded to "permissions-en@wikimedia.org". They should contain an explanation of the permissions and what limitations, if any, of usage on Wikipedia. Lastly, the copyright holder/author should select a license for the image to be released under. A list can be found here. This can be a confusing or complex process so if you have any questions or need help, feel free to ask me. Best, FASTILY (TALK) 22:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it appears the image was deleted because it was missing a copyright tag. You may wish to re-upload the image if you know under what license the author/copyright owner has released the image. The instructions above should be sufficient for what you are trying to do here so if you follow them, you'll be fine. But if you are in need further instruction, let me know and I will see what I can do. Cheers, FASTILY (TALK) 19:31, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Genies

Whether or not Arabian genies are hot in the publishing world, that has nothing to do with whether this particular (novel about a) genie meets criteria for inclusion. (We really wouldn't have an article about the character without having one about the work in which the character exists, I should point out)

I note that the novel is published by BookSurge... which is the print on demand organ of Amazon.com. True, "print on demand" is not necessarily the same thing as "vanity press", but it's still a definite negative re: the book's notability.

The novel was also described as "award-winning". Unfortunately... which award? I did some rummaging around and, although I am loath to describe the Next Generation Indie Book Awards as a scam... I don't think they have yet reached the point where winning such an award is an assertion of notability. They might, in a few years. But not yet.

I hope you understand. DS (talk) 15:35, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Susan J. Wolfson

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Susan J. Wolfson, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://pages.towson.edu/ncctrw/publications/DAWolfson.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Susan J. Wolfson

A tag has been placed on Susan J. Wolfson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 21:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Critic11. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 22:29, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Pride and Prejudice do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sketchmoose (talk) 17:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:58, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Critic11. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I dream of horses @ 16:02, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ping

I wonder if you could email me DGG ( talk ) 23:45, 7 November 2009 (UTC) How do I do this?Critic11 (talk) 04:48, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You first have to enable email on your user preferences page. then you will see a link "e-mail this user" at the right of my user page- or I can email you once the link is on yours and confirmed. But to get your started, my professional email is dgoodman at princeton.edu DGG ( talk ) 05:30, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Emperor's New Clothes

Wow! Your summaries in the commentaries section are tip-top but PLEASE develop them further! They are very intriguing and deserve more elaboration, especially in the "four areas" you mention. Great work and looking for more! Kathyrncelestewright (talk) 16:23, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and I'm glad we're working together rather than at odds. I apologize for my part in what looked like a feud. Critic11 (talk) 16:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad were working together too! Let's get going! Best! Kathyrncelestewright (talk) 11:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I don't have the time that you have--I'm a professor and have classes to teach, papers to grade, and books to write. Critic11 (talk) 12:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marilee Lindemann

The article Marilee Lindemann has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --Darkwind (talk) 18:41, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I do think Ms. Lindemann likely meets the notability guidelines, but none of the external links are reliable sources, and the new BLP policy does state that the article must have at least one reliable source. --Darkwind (talk) 18:42, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK I'm on it.... may take a few days....Critic11 (talk) 03:45, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:ML spoke.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Woodsman8.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:47, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Non-free use disputed for File:MarkWilsonCartoon.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MarkWilsonCartoon.jpg. Unfortunately, I think that you have not provided a proper rationale for using this image under "fair use". Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. Note that the image description page must include the exact name or a link to each article the image is used in and a separate rationale for each one. (If a link is used, automated processes may improperly add the related tag to the image. Please change the fair use template to refer to the exact name, if you see this warning.)

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 08:50, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jason R. Rudy

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jason R. Rudy, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.englweb.umd.edu/englfac/JRudy/rudycv.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Iola Leroy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Passing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:MiriamNKotzin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MiriamNKotzin.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 17:52, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Linda DeLibero

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Linda DeLibero requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 02:17, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think this subject fits under the schools and universities exemption under A7, but someone else has already suggested that the subject is notable. Added links from other sites and references to notable interviews.Critic11 (talk) 15:13, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Linda DeLibero for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linda DeLibero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda DeLibero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 15:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sorry I missed this one. I made a comment on Agricola's talk p. DGG ( talk ) 19:17, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Critic11. You have new messages at J04n's talk page.
Message added 13:09, 29 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

J04n(talk page) 13:09, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Critic11. You have new messages at Agricola44's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Critic11. You have new messages at Agricola44's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dracula may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Tourist: Dracula and the Anxiety of Reverse Colonization,” Victorian Studies 33.4 (1990)).Schaffer, Talia. “‘A Wilde Senf, Carol A. The Vampire in Nineteenth-Century English Literature.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:32, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dracula

Thanks for your edits adding the criticism to the article. However, just know that when you cite something, you don't crowd multiple references in one reference tag, as you did in the article. This has already been fixed, but I just wanted to let you know for future reference. Thanks again, TheStickMan[✆Talk] 23:36, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Critic11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here

Decline reason:

One open unblock at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I said I took a class at Tyngsboro High School! I did NOT say I went to Tyngsboro High School with BallofTwine. Please reinstate this! I have no idea about the other accounts.

Please UNBLOCK me! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bbb23 Please re-read what I said. There is no blatant deceit. I have no idea whom the other two accounts that you block are. I live in a building and lots of us share an IP address when we work in the common room. Please unblock me. I did not GO to high school with Balloftwine; we took a class there at night when none of us knew anything about Wikipedia. Ok? Read what I wrote!!Critic11 (talk) 21:10, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please UNBLOCK me! You clearly misread what I wrote. I have no idea whom the other two are and I have explained that you totally misread what I wrote about the Wikipedia class. It was a class AT NIGHT for adults learning about various websites. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DoRD Critic11 (talk) 21:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC) I couldn't find a website but it was a program like this one: http://www.gltech.org/home/adult-education[reply]

If I can't get on, how can I get an email to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bbb23 that he misread what I wrote?Critic11 (talk) 21:27, 7 December 2013 (UTC) Hello? Please read what I wrote! There is no deception! Bbb23 Critic11 (talk) 21:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just blocked the IP address you used to post a message to my talk page. Don't do that again. Just because no one responds to your messsages above doesn't mean that editors, including me, are not aware of them.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:57, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

??? This is why I took a class because I don't know the rules. I said who I was. If you block this IP address lots of people will be affected!!! Please undo!Critic11 (talk) 18:55, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock the iP address and please unblock me. If you have read what I wrote before you blocked me because you thought I was lying about being a high school student. Do you see now? Please! Critic11 (talk) 19:02, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Critic11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Even without checkuser, this is quite obvious behaviorally. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:33, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could you please unblock? This is based on a misreading! There is no deceit! Critic11 (talk) 15:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? When will this be resolved? Critic11 (talk) 22:31, 11 December 2013 (UTC). I have been a good editor for over 5 years. Could someone have hacked into my account? I explained about Ball of Twine but you have misread what I wrote. I am not sure what to do. I bought a new computer in August and gave my old one to a neighbor but I erased everything on it. Can you please unblock me?[reply]

Dear administrators -- I keep getting messages that sites are being blocked because of this account. Please understand that I am not doing this. I have not written anything since my last note above on December 11. Critic11 (talk) 19:08, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org.  -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 09:20, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]