|
User talk:Cowboybebop98April 2008
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'youtube\.com' . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 22:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC) jin jingThere is no neutrality problem now. I will remove the NPOV tag.--Jingandteller (talk) 12:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC) I am sorry you removed my explanation. And I am a real Canadian, just like you are a real fenqing. Cheers. Yunfeng (talk) 20:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
How about we stop the passive-aggressive attacks and dedicate our editing to present the topic in the most WP:NPOV manner as possible? It's not difficult. Assume any and all sources are biased, and present opposing and different sides of the story. Let the reader judge for himself or herself what to believe. Thanks. (And in case anybody is wondering, I've disagreed with both Jingandteller and Yunfeng on certain issues.) Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 22:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much for being reasonable. I really appreciate that. This is not really relevant to anything, but I think you should look at some Chinese articles about her and consider whether or not the story is being used as propaganda objectively, completely aside from what anyone says about it in the "Western" media. Thanks again for taking the time to consider the issues. Yunfeng (talk) 15:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thanksthanks.--Jingandteller (talk) 16:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
3RR and Jin JingIf you would look closely at what I actually changed and what not you would see that I did not violate WP:3RR, but only WP:2RR. I am also wondering, given that you are here only since a few days and take an exclusive interest in just one article, whether you are familiar with WP:SOCK. Cheers, Novidmarana (talk) 17:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
POVI agree to remove the POV tag. Thanks.--Jingandteller (talk) 08:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC) May 2008
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bchinatravelguide\.com\b' . Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 19:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Re:hiI know. It would be really stupid to have something against somebody you don't even know. I'm glad you cleared that up though; but I wasn't suspecting you at all. Wikipedia is all about a collaboration effort, and that includes a lot of debating, which may seem unfriendly at times. --haha169 (talk) 23:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC) Regarding your recent revert on Sichuan EarthquakeThe section that I removed is considered controversial and I have moved it to talk page for further discussion. This was clearly stated in my edit summary. So I don' think it is a unconstructive edit. Please provide more information other than just a template next time you tried to push the button. (Cowboybebop98 (talk) 19:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC))
|
