|
User talk:CoronalMassAffection/Archive 2022
Concern regarding Draft:Quasi-periodic pulsation
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Quasi-periodic pulsation Hello, CoronalMassAffection. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Quasi-periodic pulsation". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:38, 21 February 2022 (UTC) Hairy Ball
I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, CoronalMassAffection Thank you for creating Ly-α. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, CoronalMassAffection Thank you for creating Prominence-corona transition region. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:29, 11 June 2022 (UTC) SunspotsHi Mike here - On the sunspots page, thanks for your edits. I do think you should be aware of a subtext. I certainly agree that all the stuff about Herschel's solar observations and descriptions was irrelevant (I left it there because I am not sure about the etiquette of deleting text by somebody else). It was pretty much accurate (if a bit confused) but it was irrelevant (except perhaps the bit about what we would now call the Wilson depression of sunspots) and it was rambling. However, the point about the wheat prices correlation is that it is widely used (still!) to imply that Herschel was the first victim of a 400-year silencing campaign about sunspots and climate: all that stuff about hostile reception at the Royal Society etc. I am actually an FRS and spent time in the library looking at the original documents and its a gross distortion. There was debate, but hostile it was not. I did a google search and found over 100 climate skeptic pages that quoted, verbatim, the text on this wikipedia sunspot page - which, as I say, was misleading and historically wrong. Therefore I wanted to counter it rather than just delete it. The wording I used was aimed at being fair to Herschel and to make it clear that Herschel himself was far from convinced by the connection. For me this is important detail. MessageInABottle 18:57, 22 June 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelLockwood (talk • contribs)
WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox ColorsDear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated. We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. NoahTalk 02:45, 21 November 2022 (UTC) Hello
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Wilcox observatoryHi, do you think you could help me set up this page? I think that the telescope is note worthy enough for one and I ahve some pictures that I can upload tomorrow. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilcox_solar_observatory Synethos (talk) 04:16, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
That helps a lot already thanks! I'm not as good at 'wiki lingo', but I'll try to do better with next edit. :) Synethos (talk) 03:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
|
