This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.
Replaceable non-free use File:KenyaGrace.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KenyaGrace.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your message! I have updated the file's page + the file's talk page with:
{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|I looked online but the only other photos of her that I could find were on sale from Getty Images and Alamy. The photo that I used was taken directly from her own website where she is promoting her works. I would consider contacting the artist or her representatives to request copyright permission, however given that there appear to be no other free images of her available I would instead further the view that this image is not replaceable}}
(Non-administrator comment) Hi Control-alt-delete. Please don't add the template {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed}} to any more talk pages. That template is intended for use only on file pages. As for you reasons for disputing the deletion of the file, as I posted at User talk:Marchjuly#Copyright of photo of Kenya Grace and Explicit posted at User talk:Explicit#Deletion of photo, a non-free image of Grace is pretty much never going to be allowed as long as she's still alive because someone could reasonably create a free equivalent image serving the same encyclopedic purpose to use instead. For what it's worth, having an infobox image is a nice thing, but it's not a requirement and plenty of articles don't have such an image. You can try followng the guidance given in WP:PERMISSION if you find an image on line that you think would be nice to use, but you're not going to be able to do so without Wikipedia having some formal way of verifying the image's copyright holder's WP:CONSENT. The essay Wikipedia:Requesting free content contains some suggestions on how to find "free" images that you might find helpful. One thing you want to avoid at all costs, though, is repeatedly uploading images with questionable licensing or invalid non-free content use justifications. Wikipedia administrators understand that we all make mistakes, and they're happy to help us sort them out; they don't, however, have much tolerance for those who make the same mistake over and over again and will take more forceful action in such cases. So, if you're unsure about whether an image is OK to upload to Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons, you might want to ask about it first at WP:MCQ or c:COM:VPC. Commons, in particular, has more restrictive rules when it comes to uploading images; so, you should also take a close look at c:COM:L before uploading anything to Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Marchjuly - thank you for taking the time to write such an incredibly detailed reply, it is very helpful! I will wait for somebody to take a photo of her. There's nothing yet on OpenVerse, or Google > Tools: License free, or Flickr. Thanks for your help Control-alt-delete ★ user◾talk◾favs19:58, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for July 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kenya Grace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Algés. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Passive aggressive? Dude if you add any more unsourced content I'm going to have you up at wp:ani, in a New York minute. Every sentence that is added to Wikipedia needs a reference, even if the content copied from another article. It gets referenced. Dumping paragraphs of unsourced content into another article is not only deeply uncool, it clearly indicates WP:CIR issues as its illegal as unsourced. If there is unsourced content that is being copied, you first provide attribution, which is strictly required (I don't see anywhere either) and then you source it. Everytime. Do not do it. scope_creepTalk23:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Control-alt-delete: Your references are junk, the content isn't sourced, linked or attributed, you have WP:CIR issues and your abusive. I'd rather you didn't work any articles I worked on, as your giving me work. You don't even do proper citations. It is low-quality junk. I've repored you. scope_creepTalk00:30, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Scope creep You don't have a choice but for other people to "work on articles you worked on". This is a community-driven website with many authors. You clearly have too much of an interest in this to not be biased. You began the abuse from the get-go. Don't act like the victim. Control-alt-delete ★ user◾talk◾favs00:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, I have copied many of the citations from other articles so they're not "my" references. Take a break! Control-alt-delete ★ user◾talk◾favs00:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
