User talk:Consumed Crustacean/Archive 4
ThanksThanks for your help with the Coy disambig. Candent shlimazel 23:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC) I disagreeHello, I disagree with your statement that I cannot link to my own website from my userpage. "it doesn't matter if they're on it or if you simply link to them." According to the WP:USERPAGE It says under removal that: "Removal If the community lets you know that they would rather you delete some content from your user space, you should consider doing so - such content is only permitted with the consent of the community. After you've been here for a while, and written lots of great articles, the community may be more inclined to let you "get away with it". Alternatively, you could move the content to another site, and link to it." Notice bolded text. It also says on the page: "You are welcome to include a link to your personal home page, although you should not surround it with any promotional language." No promotional language was on my sight. So I disagree with your determination and believe that I have a right to link my Wikipedia user page to my own personal website. The rules say I can and the information is not promotional and isn't selling anything. I have contributed many articles and to many articles in this encyclopedia. My page on freemasonry actually was meant to help improve this encyclopedia. I addressed what I believe is some problems with how the articles on freemasonry are being edited and included links and info for possible future inclusion. I don't want a long drawn out affair over this but as long as I am not advocating violence I should be able to edit the content on my own personal website without interfence and without the link to it being severed since the rules not only say that I can do it but suggest that I should do it. Especially, despite my vast additions to this encyclopedia the members don't want to let me "get away with it". Also without prodding from anyone I posted a disclaimer that people may be offended by what is on my Non-Wikipedia website. So despite your gut reaction in answer to MsJapans request I think you should reconsider. Since it does not corrolate with what is written in the rules. Wikipedia can't dictate what is written on a personal website after suggesting that I link my page to a personal website. I have had several vandalizations to my userpage including removing my picture of Jesus and replacing it with a naked teen as well as other things being done to it. This is why I reverted my page so quickly and labeled it as being vandalized. I understand that people may not agree with my beliefs or quotes or whatnot that is why I followed Wikipedia policy and linked it off site. I even warn people that they might be offended so they don't have to go there. I don't think that I should be singled out for such treatment just because a few Wikipedians are up in arms about my pages. I could go through the vast amounts of user pages and give you examples of polemics that is allowed on Wikipedia or the links off site. But I'd rather not and in good faith would like to be able to link to my own webpage without harrassment as we are allowed to do. You can devise your own warning if you want. Thank you for your time and I hope that this situation can be cleared up, since I moved my page to follow the rules and cool the jets of those so incenced about it. Dwain 04:20, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
RD editHi, did you intend this edit[1] on the ref desk? Better in my opinion to delete both those trolling questions, but i wouldn't do so if another editor had already reverted a prior deletion. Was that your intention, or was it just an edit conflict?—eric 01:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Skulltag. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Catman847 04:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)I'm asking to have this page restored. i was looking at the debate about it, and whomever asked for it to be deleted was obviously biased. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skulltag The AfD was posted a few (i'd say 3) MINUTES after it was originally posted. Unless he is EXTREMELY biased against any of these articles, it really isn't possible for it to be deleted unless he was waiting for something like this to happen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Catman847 (talk • contribs)
Well, right now, seeing as i've never had an article deleted before, i'm not sure what DRV is.... Catman847 04:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
What is your reason for deleting my Until June page?oh wait.. there is none... so stop deleting it! --Mister Pine 05:00, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Re: Monkeybreath (and different spellings)The only thing I reported him was for a 3RR vio and he's been having a grudge against me, heh... I guess I should be happy that my user page is getting vandalized? Thanks for that rv, btw. :) -Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 09:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC) Scot ShermanSeriously. You instigated its deletion, and I would really really really like to see what it was all about. I heard that it was 40k. It must have been cool. Even if you can't find/don't know about a cached version, any memories you have about it would be awesome. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 159.53.46.141 (talk) 23:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC).
"Cross posting"My edit history is a active mess because I kept forgetting to use Preview. Most of those postings are minor edits to my prior text. All I've done is provide my opposition once (left to see), plus comment once (left for all to see ) on a neutral editor's vote because it noted Jakew's heavy involvement in the Circumcision topic.TipPt 18:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC) Be careful removing trollingI don't think this was trolling. The user reposted the question two days later and got an answer. See Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities#black rights. -- SCZenz 19:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
AIV removal by non adminHi, you just removed a user from AIV that had not received a final warning. I saw that this should not have been added and explained to the user that added it about final warnings and stuff. For future references, as a non admin, if it is obvious that the proposed vandal should not be blocked, am I OK to remove the name? Regards RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 22:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
My talk pageMr. Crustacean, I had actualy decided not to bother arguing anything on my talk page. Thank you for restoring it, however, I have been informed, by admins, that if I choose not to backup my discussion page I can do so. Finding out that all the negative statements of late have been started by MSJapan's complaints I have nothing to say apart from what I have written at the administrator's complaint board. Thanks again for your lucid comments. Dwain 00:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Consumed Crustacean. I partially reverted your edit on Dwain's talk page. That is, I reverted your revert of his removal of unwanted posts, but I left your new post. It's not intended as a snub to you, but I feel very strongly that since removal of other people's edits from one's own talk page, while discouraged, is not forbidden, a user who does so should not be reverted. It only causes unnecessary anger, and doesn't achieve any good sufficient to counterbalance that. And that's something that I feel even with the worst trolls. If someone inserts naughty words into the article about President Bush, then revert him, even if you're going to make him angry. But if someone removes unwanted comments from his own talk page — well, it's not damaging the encyclopaedia, is it? (I agree that the blanking and unblanking, etc., with no edit summaries, made things confusing!) Cheers. Musical Linguist 00:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Welcome vandal?Hi Consumed Crustacean. What does Seong0980 (talk · contribs) have to do with the welcome vandal? I've indented him in the list and left a comment. Did you copy&paste the wrong username, or am I missing something? Note also that Jpgordon has carried out the checkuser. Picaroon 03:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Re:VandalI really don't mind, I was going to do indef, but I thought that was a little too harsh, but you can lengthen it to indef if you wish. Cbrown1023 04:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC) Thank you for moving back the page. Some of them link to this page with these keywords. --PJ Pete
Could you check this?I posted that welcome vandal thing yesterday and you checked it out. I had prod'd one article in a new state and warned a vandal, and now they're going off on my talk page at each other being abusive. User:Honeydip69 and User:Connman21. Not sure what I should do, Honey is the vandal. - Denny 03:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Assistance required.Hello Sir I am having a problem with User:DennyColt. This is an exert of a message I recently sent him asking for evidence of my alleged vandalism.
I wrote that article to the best of my ability and I assure you that should you want to research the information you will be satisfied with what I wrote. Thank you.
How exactly would I cite a tv show? The only way I could provide a source would be to include the name of the episode. I couldn't use a website or supporting article to cite could I? Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.118.190.148 (talk • contribs).
Well after I spent all that time writing it I would be very upset and angry if it was deleted because Denny made a judgement call on something he may or may not know anything about. Thanks for your help. hi I was just thinking since you help end the punisher debate you help with the Vic Mignogna world of warcraft commerical debate? =^-^=;; —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 12 December 2008 (UTC) heyhey buddy, fuck off that stuff about ronaldo was completely accuracte. prove me otherwise cunt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Honeydip69 (talk • contribs)
thanxYOU R THE BEST. Hope you stay in Wikipedia forever.Pendo 4 03:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC) Repeat Vandal User:24.181.122.190 AssistanceHello, this IP was blocked for one day. The editor resumed vandalism as soon as the block was lifted. Can you please extend the block on this IP? -thanks- STS01 18:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Sylvia BrowneHi, with regard to your citation request in this article, clearly no one citation will cover all those radio shows, and it is not really practical to create a list of 6 citations, one after the other. Perhaps you could clarify what you're after here? Thanks a lot, and regards — BillC talk 01:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Second opinionHi, I posted a complain on the Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Donteatyellowsnow. One administrator has replied so far. I'm relatively new to the concept of WP:ANI, but I feel that considering the user was blocked once, and the number of warnings and incidents with that user, that the reaction was relatively light. Would you be able to give a second opinion, even if it supports the response. Thank again in advance. =) Langara College 05:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
SorryForgot my signature, thanks for marking it -- febtalk 05:38, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Re: SigningPlease be sure to sign talk pages and other discussion pages with ~~~~. This includes warning users with warning templates and the like. Thanks, and happy editing. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 10:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
CSSI saw you answer a CSS question on the help desk. Is there a list of classes I can reference somewhere? --Mgm|(talk) 23:02, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Many thanks for the assistanceI'd just like to say thank you for answering my question about the new message box's CSS code on the help desk. I knew I had seen something about it mentioned before, I just couldn't recall where. I hope you have a most wonderful day, and happy editing! Kyra~(talk) 01:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
ThanksFor restoring Pierre Joliot. Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 22:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Vandalism?It wasn't vandalism, I reverted a guy who replaced Mario with Michael Jackson! Bly1993 22:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank youThank you for reverting the vandalism on my user talk page, I would have done it myself, but I was blocking the user indefinitely. :) That wasn't the first time he done that, and I had just reverted/warned him (which is how he got my username). Cbrown1023 talk 23:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
help desk / hookahNo problem. I figured that section got added while you were reverting and just got removed by accident. *Mishatx*-In\Out 05:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC) Indefinitely blocked userCould you show me where this 'general consensus' is? They're being deleted per DENY; there is absolutely no consensus that people can go around deleting stuff per essays. Pages can still be put through MfD, and I'd expect that they'd get deleted there. However, DENY is not policy. 1ne 06:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
VandalismHi, could you do anything about this user: User_talk:Googoola? The account seems to be used mainly for vandalism. Thanks. Kon-Tiki001 15:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
suggestionsi suggest you take care of the rude people in wikipedia like "Lanicoya" that are rude and racist nad if you haven't noticed she has been attacking me she insulted me first and i am offended why dont you do something about that?!Bacanaleranica 03:40, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Timberlake07.jpgIn the future, make sure to a image with disputed licensing with Template:PUIdisputed and notify the uploader as well. —Iamunknown 06:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Martin's 3RRYou beat me to it, I just went there to report it. Thanks. --Milo H Minderbinder 22:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
EXPLANAITON FOR GNOMINGhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:Wikignome read it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smith Jones (talk • contribs). For keeping the Matthew Books pageArgument for keeping the Matthew Books page. There have been over 10,000 copies of these books sold, and they have received numerous reviews on Amazon.com. If this article is to be removed because the books are "not popular" then all but two articles about (spiritual) mediums should be removed as well. Also, I am working on cleaning up the page. If this article is to be removed doe to lack of notability, then the following should be as well: Channelled entities: Aiwass, Count of St Germain, Djwal Khul, Dr. Fritz, Kryon Spiritual mediums: Derek Acorah, Ailene Light, Rosemary Altea, Mina Crandon Benjamin Creme, Allison DuBois, Eva Pierrakos, Arthur Ford, Colin Fry, Ronna, Herman, Esther Hicks, Gordon Higginson, Estelle Roberts, Jane Roberts, Betty Shine, Doris Stokes, Swami Laura Horos, James Van Praagh, Lisa Williams, Mary Ann Wintkowski, Patience Worth, and Chico Xavier --Snooziums 22:38, 10 March 2007 (UTC) In addition, there is a review of the books and interview with their author on the Meria Heller show, a well-known radio show in the links section. --Snooziums 22:40, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Can you do something about this?Hello.
thanksThanks for fixing the merge at Lunisolar calendar. ⇒ SWATJester On Belay! 19:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC) User:Billy Ego reported by User:MarkThomasHi, I wonder if you could spare a minute to review my recent 3RR complaint on User:Billy Ego for his repeated revert behaviour on Nazism at 3RR report on Billy Ego? Thanks! MarkThomas 17:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
70.153.116.145That's probably not going to stop him for more than a couple of minutes. He's been IP socking for over an hour. HalfShadow 21:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
user kpy18 should not have been blocked its complete bullshit its like if i was playing crackdown and i touched myself till i peed it just doesnt happen. Now im lookin at some page that has fucking clowns on it what the hell. Well anyways its for a school project so you banned him for no fucking reason whatsoever you sir are a moron and deserve whats comin to you which i hope is a bullet. If you wont unblock him then you have to block me! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumed_Crustacean_is_a_faggot there thats for you! I made it just for you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hckydude1103 (talk • contribs)
hey how is it refusal to stop if he said its for a school project you just never asked nicely and wow you are a fucking moron nice job! o btw where is kettle moraine school at i dont know where it is can you give me directions from texas?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hckydude1103 (talk • contribs).
wow i never added ne thing to that webpage i did revert it but reverted it back right away i never added ne of that stuff so obviously you have no idea whos doing anything so how can you have the right to ban someone if you cant even figure out who edited what?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hckydude1103 (talk • contribs).
ok well if hes really good will u let him back just give him a chance man i mean it wont affect u to quick unban him and if he does something wrong just ban him again—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hckydude1103 (talk • contribs).
Association of Members' Advocates MFDGosh, never thought my post would end in an MFD but OTOH I'm a big fan of bold actions and AN consensus seems clear, so good on ya :) Anyway, I was just wondering if subpages ought to be included. Stuff like Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/AMA Coordinator and {{AMA alerts}} --kingboyk 16:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Ok i see.Sorry for that But its not me reverting a bad edit its servant saber reverting good edit. so dont blame me for that-.--Matrix17 20:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC) Arbcom ruling violation by Johnski
I recieved your message on my talk page. First of all, I would ask you to address me with a little bit more civility next time you leave a message on my page. Certainly leaving a message to "cut it the hell out" doesn't meet the standards of civility. Second, this situation is a long standing one as Gene_poole has described above. While I agree with you about the constant reverts, User:Johnski is using his new identity and remarks under the sockpuppet warning to try to give the allusion that he is not who he really is. The Administators and other's who run Wikipedia have been unhelpful for the most part in dealing with this issue. The Arbitration Committee in their great wisdom issued the weakest ruling possible, essentially making it difficult to enforce. I spend countless hours, along with others compliling stuff for arbitration in order to stop Johnski from his constant barage of vandalism. The IP starting with 211 was me as I'm at work and am not able to log in or use Wikipedia very easily. My guess is that there might be a partial block by the education board because of some of the content on Wikipedia. I don't know this for sure, it's only a guess. Davidpdx 02:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
SorryIn my rush to revert spam links added by 125.212.108.206 (a likely Harvardy sock, incidentally) to a number of articles, I inadvertently failed to realise that more recent changes had been made to several articles, and reverted to the wrong version. --Gene_poole 03:48, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
OutYou. Stop it. OUT! --Stukov 06:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC) Hmm. It's possible this should have involved more investigation into what caused it. Please feel free to reduce or lift the block if you see fit. — coelacan — 07:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
This message is to request unprotection for Harvardy's user page. I have pursued this through legitimate means. Today admin User:Tom harrison banned Harvardy indefinately for being a sockpuppet of User:Johnski. I asked for this page to be unprotected through the page protection board and was told it is up to you. In addition, since he has been banned I believe the sockpuppet warnings should be reinstated. Davidpdx 09:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
ur gheyvery —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rockermang (talk • contribs) 23:41, 17 April 2007 (UTC). Don't Threaten MeFirst of all unless your even a operator or anything, you do not threaten me! I would gladly have fixed the errors but for you to come out and threaten me like that pisses me off and scares me. I can fix the errors. I have done so and will do so. So stop threatening me. PEOPLE MAKE MISTAKES, MAYBE SOME PEOPLE FORGET TO ADD CERTAIN THINGS, you ever realize human beings aren't perfect.--Jack Cox 00:23, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Makemytrip usernameThis is in reference to your comment for the Makemytrip username. Being an employee of this company i have taken appropriate permissions to use this name, the company content and image on wikipedia. Please do reply back ASAP to sort out this issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makemytrip (talk • contribs)
What a mess...Just glanced through a few of the choice words people have said to you. Not a terribly civilized bunch are they? Vranak
Removing user:Pbethala from AIV without taking any actionHello, how come you removed this user from the AIV without taking any action against his account ? [| Diff]. His only edits have been to create attack pages, one especialy I mentioned, about a child, and accusing him of sexual crimes. It seems likely this child exists in real life, but you just removed the user from AIV, without giving a particular reason, just (1 comment removed). He created another page full of homophobic nonsense also. This is just a question, by the way, I'm just curious, as I have seen users blocked for less.--Jackaranga 21:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Quick ThanksJust a quick thanks for reverting the vandalism of my user page. Ian Goggin 09:33, 29 April 2007 (UTC) Deletion review for Template:User no GFDLJust thought you'd like to know: A template you participated in a Tfd for (Template:User no GFDL) has subsequently been speedily deleted, and is now under deletion review. Miss Mondegreen | Talk 15:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Hey Please do not edit my user pageok? thanksGatorphat 19:53, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
My userpageAll good mate - and someone appears to have altered one of the user boxes to make it too tall, which is why the layout mucked up :) Thanks for the concern though. MojoTas 07:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC) Hello! What did you mean by this edit summary? Was something not functioning as you expected it to? —David Levy 03:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
UsernameI meant that the username looks sexualy inappropriete in accordance to the username policy, to me. If you look back at the Wikipedia:Username policy#Inappropriete usernames where it mentions "Usernames that include profanity, or obscenities, or references to genitalia or sexual slang." That's what it did look like to me. Maybe I should have worded it like that.--U. S. A. 22:32, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thanks for getting the human-ape thing rightThanks for this edit. I'm amazed at how often I hear smart, educated biologists correcting others by saying "humans did not evolve from apes..." when (it seems to me) we clearly did. --Allen 02:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank youThanks, I appreciate the kind words Crustacean, no hat doffing required. Take Care. -- Azi Like a Fox 08:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC) re: removal of editsThe last thing on my mind was spamming or providing inappropriate content. But you have to agree that it does not appear to be a very consistent application of publishing rules that en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming lists and links close to 100 articles mostly scientific in nature (from which i took the specific type of referencing via REF tags), and on the Google Earth page it seems to be considered spam. Or why a free academic article raises concerns while various links to pages that include advertising in the reference section seem to be OK. By the way, there is also a broken link on the page, but I will refrain from further editing (earth.google.com/coverage/coverage_list.pdf). Ecoresearch 19:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
STOPPED!Yes, O.K.! Of course! Doma-w 02:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Is the problem solved? Can I use dataOlympics for reference again? Thanks! Doma-w 16:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
You will be eaten tomorrow with butter and garlic.Please make sure all your worldly affairs are in order before then. HalfShadow 03:08, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Would you be interested in speedy-ing the user's hoax article, Travis Kellman? --Rrburke(talk) 03:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC) Cool Cat MFD on DRVWikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 May 30#Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cool Cat -- Ned Scott 05:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC) Return of User:Martonte as User:T-KellzHi... User:Martonte, whom you blocked as a result of this ANI report, appears to be evading the block as User:T-Kellz. I submitted another ANI report here --Rrburke(talk) 19:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC) Transformers episodesUhm, how exactly those articles are supposed to cite sources if they contain nothing but plot summaries? The episodes themselves are the sources. I think you're being overzealous with these templates. - Sikon 14:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC) FYII blocked Vranak (talk · contribs) as a sock of Cjwright79 (talk · contribs). I figure you'll need to know as he's already requested an unblock... — Scientizzle 17:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Block this guyIts Moo12321 He keeps on deleting the tag article of deletion and wrote DONT DELETE ON THE ATRICLELone Shadow Wolf 02:49, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Minor editSORRY ABOUT thst i think it does the minor edit thing automatically. Smith Jones 01:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC) ?YOU HAVE TO RESIGN ALSO SMART ASS TOTALLY CRUSTED AND CONSUMED! BY OCTOBER THE 12!!! #&%@^()&^#^&@(^ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.230.32.77 (talk) 16:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Heath LedgerOkay, so when I view it in IE6 I get no text wrap and an infobox that takes up almost half the page, just because of the caption. Any ideas? Pairadox (talk) 07:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Heath Ledger at the Berlin Film Festival (2006) with some extra text for fun Photo credit: Howie Berlin.Heath Ledger at the Berlin Film Festival (2006) Photo credit: Howie Berlin.Dr.JhingaadeyI've been watching this exchange. The editor is new here, at least by this name, and clearly has things to learn. But what does it mean to say "stop spamming" to an editor who has only made ONE edit outside their own talk page. Spamming one's own talk page? Thanks, Wanderer57 (talk) 06:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
See this thread on AN/I, it wasn't my decision. Tim Vickers (talk) 18:25, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
The Maddox anonHi, sorry if this should go elsewhere... But I've tried to get some help with this person for a while. User:67.149.157.177, User:200.67.71.119, User:Panelgets, User:Arisedrink, User:Peapee and User:Amazing cow all appear to be the same guy having an issue with Maddox (and those who're trying to save the article from complete butchery). My English skills aren't very good and I can't find my way in enwiki's dispute resolution chain. Any help or advice would be appreciated. --SaberExcalibur! 06:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
If you look at this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Maddox_%28writer%29&action=history there may be more proxies used by Panelgets that have NOT been marked as open proxies.
WhisperToMe (talk) 20:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Anti AmericanYour edits are very anti American. This should not be acceptable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.39.23.16 (talk) 22:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Re:Earth Hour imageI thought wider image actually shows a better idea and understanding of the Google website, while reading the information of Google's participation in Earth Hour. The size that the wider image takes is not that significant.. same size as how much the quote takes up vertically. While the previous image takes a more space vertically but wider space for the quote to show, going over another section's space. Well if the previous image actually looks better to you then revert it back. --staka (T ・C) 22:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Indefinite block on sock IP?this seems a little excessive, no? I know the user has been evading blocks and posting frivolous cases to AN, but an indefinite block to an IP without a history? Enigma message Review 04:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
CitingThat's odd; a person can do an interview and use a doctor such as a geneticist in a research paper. (79times (talk) 18:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC))
Serial accuser of anti-AmericanismBack in March a wikipedian left you an accusation of anti-Americanism. They left similar accusations on half a dozen user's pages. You might be interested in my invitation for them to be more specific. Yours in cooperation and collegiality. Geo Swan (talk) 21:50, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
I'm trying to see if I understand, are you saying that with those contribs I should have re warned and waited for him to disrupt a BLP again, and then gone to AIV?--Cube lurker (talk) 03:36, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Help with SockHello. I noticed that you were currently active on AIV, so I'm hoping you can help me with what I believe is an obvious sockpuppet of User:Swamilive. This is my first time dealing with a sockpuppet, so could you please point me in what direction I should go, or, if you can help deal with it now, tell me the best way to handle it next time? I started to go to AIV since a sock report had already been done, but wasn't sure if that was the appropriate place. Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Swamilive is the report for reference. In July, one confirmed sockpuppet of Swamilive added this section [4] to James Bay. User:P199 removed it [5], and then Swamilive restored it [6]. Today, User:JeremyJamesJohnson added a slightly expanded version of this section [7], which I reverted leaving an edit summary saying that it had been removed a few times before. While I was trying to figure out exactly how I should handle this, I was reverted by JeremyJamesJohnson [8], who left an edit summary saying "no it hasn't". Since the first half of the section is word for word the exact same as the edits in July, it's obvious that they knew that it had been and, I think, helps to confirm that the user is Swamilive. Thanks for your time, which is probably being wasted as there's probably a better way for me to handle this :) Apparition11 (talk) 02:07, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:No_arrow.svg listed for deletionAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:No_arrow.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Sock Block TemplateHi there. I don't mean to try to bite you :) but please try to remember to subst all of the sockblock templates that you use. Thanks and if you would like to reply to this please use my talk page. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 15:51, 27 October 2008 (UTC) Main Page redesignThe Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll to select five new designs, before an RFC in which one will be proposed to replace the Main Page. The poll closes on October 31st. Your input would be hugely appreciated! Many thanks, PretzelsTalk! 15:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
noticeboard achieveNot sure if achieve pages are monitored. Added examples of bot problem. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive177#User:OKBot This editor has, for some reason, reverted my good faith edit at Punisher: War Zone for no apparent reason. Does this count as vandalism after a final warning? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
My userpageI'll ask you again; why did you remove a short and simple statement about God from my userpage? Is it because you are an atheist? Is it because you think the Flying Spaghetti Monster concept is the perfect retort to religious belief? Why, in the name of UP and NOT are you violating DBAD? -Zahd (talk) 05:56, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
re: Software cracksre: your comment at the Reference Desk: That might be the most tactful and yet informative response to that kind of question I've seen yet. "Good Form" — Ched (talk) 11:28, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Maybe I'm a little pissedBecause I had thought I had helped change this user into a constructive contributor, and now I've been betrayed.— Dædαlus Contribs 06:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
my "inflammatory comments"ok maybe my comment was a little "soapboxy" but I was just getting a little P.O. by all the things people were saying about how well IVF works and stuff...but I wasn't attacking anyone personally, so I thought it was ok, sorry! :0) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.226.79.168 (talk) 05:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC) ActismelDARN, that was fast!! (You did all that while I was still looking for a clear basis on which to suggest a CU!) Nice to see an admin with turbo-boost is watching out, good eye! :-D ) Edit Centric (talk) 03:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
ANI revertHiya :-) Are you sure you meant to do this? ╟─TreasuryTag►contribs─╢ 09:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
hey CCawesome handle!Troyster87 (talk) 09:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
NortonHi there CC, I stopped by, well for one thing to say hi .. Hi. The other was a post from the help desk. I was wondering which AV program you prefer yourself - I like Nod32 and AVG for the free one myself. Anyway, another editor asked me for some help on the Norton article, not that I particularity wanted to because I'd lost much of my respect for their products in the last 8 - 10 years or so for the very reasons you mentioned on the HD .. overhead, bogs things down, hard to remove ... all the stuff you already know. Anyway, what I didn't know (until a month or so ago), was that apparently Norton 2009 has made some very good improvements to their packages. Lot faster and lighter ... ya-da, ya-da. I read through not just the wiki article, but a lot of the various test sites, references, etc. Thought it was interesting, not enough for me to go buy it .. but still interesting just the same. Well, that's my "FWIW" post for the day/night. Have a good one. ;) — Ched ~ (yes?)/© 07:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
CFLsPlease see my question at "Energy saving lightbulbs" on the Science Reference Desk, regarding "free" CFL recycling and "mercury-free" CFLs. I grant that some bulbs probably have less mercury thanb others. Edison (talk) 16:52, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Your help is requested.Hello. I have seen some of your post and feel you are a logical competent admin. I was hoping to get another pair of admin eyes over at Circumcision. I have no idea on your views and do not expect you to support me simply because I ask your opinion, however I do/will respect what you have to say. I had opened up an RFC that has gotten zero attention from outside the page but that is secondary to a structure debate now taking place. Garycompugeek (talk) 18:03, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Attempting to resore articlesI have a few thoughts on deltions. My main one is I am trying to figure out why in the past most people have done speedy deletions with at least a little warning so I could dispute or at least save the text to use elsewhere before they did the deletion. Today Ryulong (I think that is his user name) deleted 10 or more articles I had created. While I have to admit these were not the best articles in all cases, I was confident Marie Cornwall as the editor of the [Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion]] clearly met a given criteria for notability. Unfortunantly this was not a feeling help by the deleter, and he did not have even the politness to in any way notify me of the deletion. So if you could send me copies of the delted articles it would be creatly apprecieated. I am not 100% sure this is a complete list, but deleted were Ugo A. Perega, Brent L. Nielsen, Dennis A. Wright, Dennis A. Wright (baptist), C. Allen Ostergar, Ray L. Huntington, Marie Cornwall, Richard I. Kimball, J. LeRoy Kimball, George W. Givens and Gordon B. Lindsay.Johnpacklambert (talk) 23:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC) Bill Kimball, who was majority leader of the Arizona State Senate, and Walter H. Pierce are also in this list. Is there anyway to get a massive delete classified has having clearly deleted notable articles and having it massively overturned for such disregard of wikipedia policies?Johnpacklambert (talk) 00:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC) Hartt Wixom and James L. Kimball, Jr. are two more articles of mine that were recently deleted.Johnpacklambert (talk) 00:00, 24 April 2009 (UTC) Add Morgan Warburton to the list. I thought top scoring women's basketball players would be exempted from attack, but it appears that there was a full scale deletion of my recent additions to wikipedia, without any real discrimination about what was under attack.Johnpacklambert (talk) 00:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC) Sidney E. Mead also has to be added to the articles I created that were deleted without any warning by Ryulong. If I had been given notice I could have demonstrated that Mead fits multiple categories for inclusion of academics, and could have easily come up with many more sources.Johnpacklambert (talk) 01:23, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
noticesthanks for letting me know about my comments. it just bugs the crap outta me when I see people defending stuff I don't believe in and which seems so common-sensical. I guess I really just need to cool it...sorry. won't happen again. =0( 98.226.79.168 (talk) 04:52, 10 May 2009 (UTC) A note re: Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus reviewPlease be advised that I have recently conducted a review of the Rorschach test (formerly Rorschach inkblot test) talk page and archives. At some point, you have commented on the issue of the display and/or placement of the Rorschach inkblot image. Based on my understanding of your comment(s), I have placed you into one of three categories. I am issuing this note so that you can review how I have placed you, and to signal if this is an appropriate placement and/or to make known your current thoughts on this matter. You may either participate in discussion at the article talk page or leave a note at my talk page; but to keep things in one place, you should also clarify at Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review/addendum. Longer statements may be made here or quick clarifications/affirmations based on several pre-written statements can be made here. Best regards, –xenotalk 14:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Change Network CardI respectfully ask you to reconsider this edit. I do not wish my IP address to be publicly searchable in the Reference Desk archive via google or any other search engine. If you feel it absolutly necessary to force the question to remain, then please edit out all instances of my IP address (don't worry about signatures, but the actual discussion about the IPs I would like gone). Many thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.54.173 (talk) 14:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
you seem like a reasonable personhello, I just commented on User talk:Andor29. An editor you blocked, then unblocked. The editor seems like a person who wants to genuinely add content to wikipedia, I just fear that they are going to face a lot of problems soon. If you could add this editors talk page to your watch list, as I have done, so that there are a few more eyes on the situation to help him. Ikip (talk) 20:11, 15 August 2009 (UTC) AfD nomination of Wake Up! AriaAn editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Wake Up! Aria. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wake Up! Aria (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC) |