User talk:Cometstyles/Archive February 08

Sedbergh School

Hi. This edit is a good one, not vandalism. See Edmund Sharpe. Best, Sam Korn (smoddy) 11:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

argh ..sorry..shoot me :P ...--Cometstyles 11:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bang. No worries :-) Sam Korn (smoddy) 11:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
/me dies x_x ...--Cometstyles 11:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

good fiji rugby Able to beat South Africa —Preceding unsigned comment added by Necro86 (talk • contribs) 21:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Etail in India

Hiya - just a thought, but isn't this a bit harsh? Newbies often think that blanking the page will cure the problem, so I suspect that was the editor's intention. I've found that if they do so it's appropriate to leave it blank and insert the db-author tag instead. Thanks! gb (t, c) 11:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Ryan edit

"Hi, the recent edit you made to Jack Ryan (Senate candidate) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 12:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC)"

Hello,

To be frank, I have no idea what you mean by saying that my edit appears "unconstructive." Someone had lied in the original article and claimed that his wife was angry because "they went to vacation spots she disliked" or something. This was a blatant lie, as the sources in the article clearly demonstrate. In the future, I will try to use the Edit Summary function to greater use for other people's convenience, as you suggest; but please make sure you understand my edits in the future before labeling them "unconstructive." Thanks, though, for your Edit Summary suggestion.

Regards

why did you delete my additions to sleep and loneliness?

Hi, I am a new registration. I would like to understand why you deleted my additions to sleep, smog silk and loneliness. I thought I had added useful information.

thanks and regards

Edits to List of fast food restaurants

Please stop attempting to have every fast food chain, notable or not, listed on List of fast food restaurants as this is against WP:NOT#DIR. Furthermore, reverting the removal of the location directory in Pollo Campero is also against the policy and should be stopped. 69.234.104.187 (talk) 10:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why was my post reverted please

why was my immuno post reverted

please y??

ok fair enuf

thank you fo telling me

Wilmington Montessori AfD

I was acting on the suggestion of another editor (which is just above your comment on my talk) and would never intentionally vandalize a page. My detailed comments were moved to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wilmington_Montessori_School . I apologize for any error on my part. Daddy.twins (talk) 15:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

if you see I actually reverted back to your edit within a minute, just didn't see the edit summary clearly..sorry, my mistake :) ...--Cometstyles 15:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's the buzz?

[1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.100.250.217 (talk) 15:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

oh ok..yeah if you think I made an error, no need to complain, just revert it back.. I won't change it again :) ...--Cometstyles 15:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cool.
You better be sure, because I was just about to transform the whole article to incorporate the Charles Butler (beekeeper) entry when you did that! :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.100.250.217 (talk) 15:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

St Helena Secondary College

Hi,

I often edit my school's wiki page, and noticed you have cleaned up a fair chunk of vandalism over the past month ot so. I wish to thank you for going out of your way to do this. It is much appretiated!

Barras (talk) 05:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

Thanks for the revert. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 11:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And for the archive page. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 01:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vadama

May I thank you for helping protect the article mentioned in the subject line against repeated vandalism by the user of I.P. address 203.101.110.2? I wish to indicate to you that the user of this I.P. address has already been blocked once for vandalising another page on the Iyers (of whom the Vadama form a sub-group). Although I have repeatedly undone his vandalism, he does not in the least appear to be bothered. Perhaps further punitive measures are required against the user, for him to learn a lesson. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.226.90.231 (talk) 16:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting Spiked Review of Books

Hello,

I'm sorry for any recent confusion. I've never written a Wikipedia entry before and at the end of January I embarked upon writing a piece on the Spiked Rview fo Books, which I was hoping to write in installments. It was quickly flagged as an AfD but I protested, claiming that I wasstill working on it. However, after further discussion I would now appreciate it if you could delete the article. Again, I'm afraid I'm new to writing Wikipedia articles, so I'm struggling to get rid of the article - my deletion was just an attempt to quickly get ridof an article I'd created and didn't want anymore.

Apologies.

Thesoundofsinners (talk) 10:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

galileo thermometer

--Gypsy5000 (talk) 10:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)THE GYPSIES WILL CURSE YOU IF YOU DON'T STOP CHANGING IT BACK[reply]

Wow, it will be an honour :) ...--Cometstyles 10:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

for the reverts! Cheers, Dlohcierekim Deleted? 11:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ukrainian election

Boy, you're fast. Please see my explanation for deleting the "Political Crisis" section which I have given on the article's talk page ([diff], and if after reading it it you still think it should be re-instated then I'd welcome your discussion of it there.Timberframe (talk) 11:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what is wrong with you??

You are only 22 and live in FiJI?? What are you doing intentionally wiping out history of a town on the other side of the world. Leave my edits will you, or read up and expand the article to incorporate the history pertaining to the lives of 53% of its population! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.20.28.57 (talk) 12:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Super Cup

Please read the edit I made and then read what it was before and tell me how on Earth it was vandalism, the article before contained a lot of POV and contained needless information. Please stop with your labelling of "vandalism" as you clearly don't understand what vandalism is. I'm trying to make the article more respectable. 81.153.9.118 (talk) 12:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my discussion with 195.188.40.144

could you explain why you deleted a message between me and another user. It was me asking him to stop trying to post crap to the deaths list. I fail to see why you are editing messages that are not yours?--Curuxz (talk) 10:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

kk thanks for clearing that up. --Curuxz (talk) 10:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Penal substitution

Hi. I saw that you reverted some edits by an anon. Looking over them, there are some POV adjustments required, but on the whole it seems like something that wouldn't need to be reverted unless you suspect a copyvio or something. In any case, the anon has reapplied the edits. Have I overlooked something? (Please reply here.) --Flex (talk/contribs) 13:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

nah, its ok..i did overlook some of his edits as POV, but I think he is just trying to fix the sentences so that it sounds better (atleast to him)..nothing wrong with it :)...--Cometstyles 13:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Heh, also stop beating me! BJTalk 11:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'am sorry if my Dial-up is faster than your broadband ;)...--Cometstyles 11:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That just makes it worse. :( BJTalk 11:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Policy

I'm sorry. Please direct me to the policy that states "if an image was uploaded by an experienced editor it cannot be removed without their agreement". --Capitana (talk) 11:50, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You could have just said that... the comment in your edit summary made it seem like you were advocating an elitist leadership structure of the article. My argument however would be that an image showing a complete nutter waving a "go to hell" sign can serve only to be divisive and antagonistic. --Capitana (talk) 12:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What you consider to be a "nutter" is what that person sees as an expression of her patriotism against her enemy. Just because you don't like her sentiments, or disagree with them, does not mean you have the right to remove what is an excellent picture of the concept. When it comes to patriotism, it is likely someone will always be offended by the sentiments expressed, especially when it is expressed in referenced to a perceived enemy of that country. --David Shankbone 17:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Then if it is offensive we shouldn't have it. It's a good quality depiction of the subject I'll give you that. But the subject is probably insane. --Capitana (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just because it is offensive to you doesn't mean it it is offensive. Many people agree with her sentiments - I know because I was there at the protest and reported on it for Wikinews. So please stop forcing your POV. --David Shankbone 18:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

!תודה

Thanks for the revert on my userspace! :) I wasn't even sure if it was vandalism, actually. I was trying to figure it out when you reverted it out from under me. :D Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 13:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert that?

Would you kindly explain why you reverted me here? The edit was factual and improved the article, and it does not seem to have been discussed. So again, why? 91.64.28.152 (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you re: User:124.185.240.220

Thanks for your quick action regarding the above IP's edits to my talk page. :) --Deadly∀ssassin(talk) 11:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow

Due to my "using the old school way" i find it almost impossible to revert any edits. You have beaten me to all edits and i have spent hours reverting!!! Nice work. Drydom Any thoughts? 11:46, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You what?

What's this all about? Have you ever looked at WP:MOS? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.18.71 (talk) 00:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

classical music article

Why did you revert that edit? The Talk Classical site is a very appropriate external link.

Deletion of edit

Hi. You recently deleted an edit I made to the article on the film Glory a few seconds after I made it. However, my edit was not an act of vandalism but a genuine attempt to improve the article. I wish you would have assumed good faith and at least have added a comment explaining why you immediately deleted my edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marsoult (talk • contribs) 11:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your swift reply. I have found a seemingly reliable source to back up the claim I made (which I admit sounded like an act of vandalism) and will include it in the article. Marsoult (talk) 11:51, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thanks

Formatting of RfA votes

Hi. Re [2] this edit: first of all I'd like to apologize for accidentally inserting an extra un-nullified hash symbol into the list of support votes, which was counted by a bot as an extra support. Secondly I'd like to thank you for fixing it so the number of votes was counted correctly. Thirdly I'd like to let you know that I would have appreciated being notified that the wording of my vote was being changed. You may not think the addition of the word "and" is very significant, but I felt that the paragraph breaks were important and would have wanted to be notified that a paragraph break was being replaced by "and"; also the way it was left, it looked as if only the first 2 paragraphs were part of the vote and as if the 3rd paragraph was a reply. I've re-edited it again to replace the paragraph breaks with "(paragraph break)"; I hope I didn't mess up the count or anything this time.

If you know of any good way to format multi-paragraph votes, I'd appreciate being told about it. I think actually it would have been OK if I'd just deleted one extra hash symbol. The way it got there is this: I had originally formatted my vote with everything indented with "#:" so that everything lined up, and had one line with just "#" before everything. Then someone informed me that it looked as if my vote might not be counted because it was indented, so I removed the colon before the word "Support". I should also at the same time have removed the previous line which had just "#", but I didn't think of doing that. Maybe it looked OK on preview. Anyway, now it's kindof one paragraph but with two "(paragraph break)'s".

Actually, I don't think your edit did fix the vote count. I think you still left that extra hash symbol in there. I think it's fixed now, though. --Coppertwig (talk) 03:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. You fixed it in your next edit [3] where you deleted that extra line that just had a hash mark. Anyway, thanks for fixing it and sorry again for messing up the count. --Coppertwig (talk) 04:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to say this anyway: I'm sorry, I over-reacted. The word "and" is really not a big deal. I'm sure I'm the only one who cares if it's there or not -- it's not going to change the configuration of the universe. I'm sorry I sounded as critical as I did above, and in my edit summary at the RfA. I totally forgive you and don't even think you did wrong (though don't do it again :-). I'm in your debt, actually, for fixing the messed-up vote count, and beyond that for your reverting of vandalism at Simple English Wikiquote, which I very much appreciate. --Coppertwig (talk) 13:07, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem Glad to be of help.... I think O_O ..--Cometstyles 13:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My half-joking "don't do it again" above refers only to the omission of notifying me, not to refactoring my vote in this situation. And thank you also for noticing the problem and figuring out that it was my vote causing it. --Coppertwig (talk) 00:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MascotGuy IP

It's the one I'm using right now, and I remember seeing someone editing from this IP trying to copy him... --Ashford1982 (talk) 11:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That Ip is blocked for 5 YEARS then how are you using it... ? ..--Cometstyles 11:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Errr... it's blocked as allowing loggedin editors since it can, Cometstyles, and 5 years is WAY TOO LONG for it to be blocked... and it's not a "zombie computer", but it should be unblocked, if only because it serves a large number of people, it's a public computer and a corporate firewall, so... --Ashford1982 (talk) 11:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Err "11:02, February 9, 2008 Jesse Viviano (Talk | contribs) blocked "84.45.219.185 (Talk)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 5 years ‎{{Zombie proxy}})", according to that "account creation blocked" so it's blocked for account creation too and if I'm correct, MascotGuy edited for San Diego in USA and not Great Britain where that Ip originates from...--Cometstyles 11:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeh, but this guy thought it was funny to try and copy him, unfortunately that means no-one can edit unless they've got an account... and yes, it is a british IP. --Ashford1982 (talk) 11:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship?

I know you, and you know me. Are you ready for an RFA? Rudget. 12:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope...--Cometstyles 12:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
:( Rudget. 12:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
--Cometstyles 12:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, one last thing, would you support an indef block of Bigbadbradwel (talk · contribs) (who just edited this page). It appears to be acting in a VOA manner. Rudget. 12:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well I don't bite, whichever admin thinks that this is a VOA can block it but I won't report it to AIV though..--Cometstyles 12:57, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you kindly answer my question.

May I repeat my question from above: Why did you revert my edit here ? 91.64.31.119 (talk) 18:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't that a long time ago and anyways.."seduced young kids"..is that a proper term to use? O_O..--Cometstyles 01:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:86.163.39.48

Seeing as this user followed the instructions given in the first warning to a tee, could you consider restating your message to this user about removing the content? The Evil Spartan (talk) 13:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get what you meant?...--Cometstyles 13:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He removed a section the first time. I gave a {{uw-delete1}} message, which says "don't remove content without an edit summary". He went back, removed it again, with an appropriate edit summary. I'm not sure a blanket revert and a standard {{uw-vandalism2}} template really helps much. The Evil Spartan (talk) 13:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well actually it was a Level 2 warning.. (see Edit summary) but I think since I use this new program, it's a bit different compared to he normal one...--Cometstyles 14:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand please explain

I dont get why what I wrote constitues vandilism as Alex Walkinshaw and Jodie Marsh are in fact cousins, just because YOU don't know summat dont make it untrue. Please take time to answer me. Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.22.165.217 (talk) 14:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Neuro-linguistic programming

Hi there! I see you reverted my edits. I'm not sure quite how a discussion of the use of safe and live ammunition, or stooges, in Derren Brown's Russian Roulette is related to NLP, or how the solid-paragraph section at the bottom called "NLP responses to criticism" is in any way good for the article (its only reference is the text "Turtles all the Way Down", suggesting it's all original research, the formatting was horrible, and all of its comments were mentioned in other sections. It's a tacked-on rant.)137.195.68.169 (talk) 13:14, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ooh never-mind..fixed..thanks ) ...--Cometstyles 13:17, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers, I appreciate that these things happen when you're on the lookout for vandalism, and my edit summaries were hardly informative. ;) 137.195.68.169 (talk) 13:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
np, nowadays its hard to tell if edits are vandalism or not..since simple edits are considered more of a vandalism than large-scale blanking..bots don't get hem all sadly... :) ..--Cometstyles 13:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doczilla's RfA

Clicking show or hide won't do anything. There's something about the formatting of your talk page which interacts with my thank you box to screw up for the formatting of everything under. (I just noticed that the "Hi" message below isn't visible when my full thank you note appears here.) Therefore, because I'm not the kind of person who wants to screw up the formatting of somebody's talk page, you get your thank you note on a special page: User:Doczilla/RfAThanksSpecial. I hope you like it. I certainly appreciated your involvement in my RFA. Best, Doczilla RAWR! 06:19, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hi

Why is my edit "unconstructive", exactly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.19.52.1 (talk) 11:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Threats on my talk page

Why are you restoring threats to my talk page?[4] Pairadox (talk) 13:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't, it was an edit-conflict but since I'm on dial-up, the faster person (Krimpet) got it and by the time i realised it was reverted, my script already reverted krimpet's edit back to the vandals, sorry..this ain't the first time it has happened.. :( ...--Cometstyles 13:42, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, next time try correcting your error. It's been more than ten minutes since your mistake and it's more than a little disturbing to see the same threat show up twice. Pairadox (talk) 13:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Revert in PangYa

Why did you revert my edits, it is a fact that the Season 4 girl is Lucia, so the video is not needed anymore and should be replaced. RasAlmond (talk) 14:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PangYa&diff=prev&oldid=192058744 This edit seemed like a personal point of view i.e "Lucia - A spoiled idol pop singer ", since on wikipedia we prefer everything to be neutral and not personal and if you had re-worded that sentence, it wouldn't have been reverted...--Cometstyles 14:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's her personality - Spoiled and happy go lucky. RasAlmond (talk) 14:40, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seventh Day Adventist

Sir, Criticism section should be part of Critism article as is in all other aritcles regarding any other religion from Catholicism to islam.

But it was never added to a criticism article..--Cometstyles 13:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Països Catalans has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 14:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"...it appears to be unconstructive". Please, don't guide yourself by the appearances. --Owdki talk 14:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You removed a whole section of talk edits by a group of other editors and that inm y books applies as an 'unconstructive' edit..--Cometstyles 14:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting

Why were you so quick to revert without any discussion here, for what seems like a legitimate good faith edit? Timeshift (talk) 10:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ahh yes sorry reverted, and yeah if you see me doing it again, just revert it, I will understand..I'm patrolling recent changes, sometimes the smallest changes look like vandalism.. :) ..--Cometstyles 10:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Isaacs has specifically requested his photo on wikipedia is changed. Independent Talent Group Limited represent Jason in the UK and can be contacted on 020 7636 6565. Ask for Andy Gout. He will confirm this is fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indtalent (talk • contribs) 10:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure but it seems your picture isn't licensed properly so it might get deleted in week, please see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags...--Cometstyles 10:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism and redirects

I am completely confused by your actions regarding my minor edit to the divide and rule article. I only attempted to change a link to point to a main article rather than go to a redirect. You appear to believe that this constitutes vandalism. The issue is not really worth fighting over and I have no intention to waste my time with it - if you really like that link pointing to a redirect, fine. But for future reference, you should consider being less hostile to well-intentioned corrections by new users. Just saying... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.82.7.9 (talk) 12:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems it was moved and they forgot to remove he double redirects from Linked articles, nevertheless, remember to specify changes you make in the Help:Edit summary, which you didn't do in the first edit and you second edit wasn't clear as well..try to fix redirects with summary "fixing redirects" or likewise ..--Cometstyles 12:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Stop reverting my good-faith redirects without reason, it's not very polite. 82.148.70.2 (talk) 13:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
feces is a proper term to use instead of shit..--Cometstyles 13:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please assume good faith please, it's not very nice of you to revert my good faith edits without a reason. 82.148.70.2 (talk) 13:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Optimus Maximus

Could you please leave a edit summary when referting someone's work? Thanks, 213.94.252.38 (talk) 10:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

most edits are reverted if sources aren't provided such as claiming someone has died so to be careful, we may remove stuff which are unsourced to prevent problems relating to the article and keeping it as fair and unbiased as possible :) ...--Cometstyles 10:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, but it would be helpful to know why it has been reverted, just for future reference. 213.94.252.38 (talk) 10:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my edit?

how was it unconstructive? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.1.62 (talk) 11:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CRITICISM REMOVED

I please you to stick with wiki policy!

There are some things in this article which break wiki policy, the main one is the fact that some parts of article should be moved to criticism section.

Roman Catholic Church is known for religious exclusivism, they claim to have truth, and that all others are more or less wrong, just as they claim that there is only one true church, other Churches couldn't be called churches, Peter was first pope, Jesus founded Roman Catholic Church and so on.... another words, claims which are disputed by majority non-RCC Christianity.

However, article regarding their "exclusivism" is in article called "Criticism of Catholic Church", not on main article, same is with Islam and all other Christian, or non-Christian faiths. Why? Becouse it is wiki policiy, parts of articles which are criticism focused go in criticism article, if such exists. And such, indeed does exist. For that reason I have removed "Criticism" section to "Criticism of ... Adventist Church"

The whole or great majority of Criticism section should go to "Criticism of ... Adventist Church"

If not, I will start one in Roman Catholicism article, which is probably most criticized religion in world, but has no word on Criticism in main article. Wiki has to use same rules for everybodey, all are equal. Roman Catholic Religion is not "over" the rule, nor is Adventists church under that rule. I please you not to act like you don't know wiki policy. 

User:Sumaterana
Moving and removing are 2 different things and unless stated, you should never remove substantial or large amount of information from an article without having a discussion on it first i.e write about what you would like moved or removed on its talkpage so that other people that have contributed to that article knows the reason why their contributions were removed..--Cometstyles 12:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Davidson reversions

I think you inadvertently reverted an anonymous user's attempts to correct vandalism to a vandalised version containing hoax material. Just some advice to check the edits before reverting. Best wishes - Fritzpoll (talk) 13:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

christian byers edit.

why was my christian byers edit reverted when i was actually editing his page so it told the truth about him? from what i can see about you on this page thing is that you seem very quick to delete people's posts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theslippers (talk • contribs) 09:40, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

see your edit and tell me if its not vandalism, saying you will "smash the mouth of the person that will delete your edit", is 100% vandalism, this is an encyclopaedia and unless you provide facts claiming that your sources are true, its practically impossible to believe that the information you wrote is true... --Cometstyles 11:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you are quick

i put that vamdalisim test i and it was removed in two minutes goog to see people are working —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.223.83.97 (talk) 11:50, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to red dead revolver

Why have you removed my edits on red dead revolver?

Only three of the characters are really in the game.

It is a hoax.

Please remove the characters section.

Also, jack everest is not a famous person!!! --Hicktunus (talk) 12:58, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes I know Jack Everest is a hoax article and if left the way it is, it will be deleted eventually, no need to blank it over and over again :)...--Cometstyles 12:59, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Green anarchy

Yo, if you don't mind me asking, why are you reverting the addition of Category:Green anarchy to relevant pages? Regards, скоморохъ 12:58, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the person adding is not giving a reason as to why he is adding that cat to a number of articles since these things should be discussed first before being added..--Cometstyles 13:02, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You don't think the link between Jensen/Bookchin and Green anarchy is obvious from their articles? скоморохъ 13:06, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The best kind of userpage vandalism...

Is the kind you don't find out about until you check your userpage's edit history, so thank you for this revert! -- saberwyn 06:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OBJECTION of your revert

I object your revert because for example, the categories that are related to "WikiProject" are prefixed MOSTLY "Category:WikiProject" RATHER THAN "Category:Wikipedia:WikiProject". See the following page for detail~ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixindex&from=WikiProject&namespace=14 So I am doing CONSTRUCTIVE thing!!!!!!!!58.177.85.161 (talk) 11:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am angry about why you ignore my reasonable objection. PLEASE give me reason why I cannot edit those article because I still think that I am right. 58.177.85.161 (talk) 12:03, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my talk page!

Weltanschaunng has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Weltanschaunng 11:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Message

You seem to accidentally have vandalism my edit on Football (word) and a reply I left a user on Talk:GordyB I suggest you stop. - S.Azzopardi (talk) 12:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Truly sorry

I am very sorry, I accidentally blocked your account. I was attempting to block User:Barbeesha, whom you were reverting. I accidentally clicked the wrong "block" button. If there's anything else I can do, let me know. Again, I am deeply sorry. Parsecboy (talk) 13:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm auto-blocked. can you fix that ?..--Cometstyles 13:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
nvm (01:31, February 26, 2008 Majorly (Talk | contribs) unblocked #799748 ‎ (autoblock)) Majorly fixed it ..--Cometstyles 13:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Parsecboy (talk) has smiled at you and showered you with WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:User:Cometstyles/smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm glad you accept my apology. I would've fixed the autoblock, but I literally had to leave for work after unblocking and apologizing for my error. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 15:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alcoholics Anonymous

Far from being an unproductive edit, it was one that has been discussed on the talk-page for some-time. I am moving content over to a new article, as MATCH deserves one. Please, please look into things before reverting changes just because some Bot thinks it might be vandalism. Step13thirteen (talk) 13:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

moved to userpage

Rudget. has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Title says it all. :) Rudget. 18:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

80th Academy Awards Presenters

I'm using a table format like the section in the 78th Academy Awards since it is much neater or more organized.

Ok continue, but be careful or it may be reverted again, by someone else :) ..--Cometstyles 10:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

Qst (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Aww, I couldn't stand to see User:Cometstyles/Loved :) Qst (talk) 17:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conrad Black

I have the feeling you also do not know who Conrad Black is. He is quite famous - actually infamous - several books have been written about him. He is due to enter US Federal Prison in Florida next Thursday, 6 March, to start a 6-1/2 sentence for fraud. Thus, I am going to reverse your reversal of my edit.

You may find it uncomfortable that universities have "criminals" amongst their alumni - but it is true - just go look at Tufts University list of alumni:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Tufts_University_people

There is an entire section of "Criminals".

Please do not reverse my entry after I reverse your vandalism. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.139.97 (talk) 11:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conrad Black again

I suggest you go look at Conrad Black's Wikipedia entry before you start making blind edits. The guy is no longer a businessman - he's bankrupt - in fact, they now say he never knew how to make money in the first place - that's why he had to revert to fraud by swindling his shareholders. But you probably don't know any of this - you've probably never even heard of Conrad Black. My guess is you're one of these people that just go around making hundreds of reversing edits without any knowledge of the underlying subject matter.

As for the matter of universities having criminals as alumni, well, you're just going to have to get used to it. I realise this may not conform to your view of the world, but there ARE university graduates in prison.

Ta-ta.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.139.97 (talk) 11:37, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conrad Black once again

Yes, I was right - you're one of these guys that gets off on going around making hundreds of reversing entries on subjects that you have no knowledge of - except that in your case, you're not just making hundreds of entries, you've made TENS OF THOUSANDS of them. You're now in your 20,000+ edit - almost all of them reversing entries. There is no possible way that you could be knowledgeable on all the subjects you make entries on. My guess is the odds are a hundred to one that you've never even heard of Conrad Black, much less his felony convictions for fraud, or that he idiotically gave up his Canadian citizenship (thus ensuring that he gets to serve his time in an American prison instead of a cushy Canadian prison). Please do us all a favour and stop reversing entries on subjects that you know nothing about. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.139.97 (talk) 11:46, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I stopped reverting your edits long time ago, see my edits, and yeah please learn to assume good faith and please no personal attacks and the only reason i reverted your edits was because the way you wrote them, meaning that it wasn't Neutral and was written in a hateful manner such as this where you didn't provide and sources and just wrote down that he is a "Convicted felon, fraudster, swindler" which will be seen as vandalism by any editor looking through your edits and instead of adding the sources, you reverted those editors and tagged it as "Reversing vandalism" which is not the right way to do stuff here on Wikipedia..--Cometstyles 11:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent changes

Howdy. You seem to be going a little revert-crazy. A number of the recent reversions you've made have been to perfectly legitimate changes, some of them discussed in the Talk pages for the articles in question. You might want to take more than, oh, 1/2 minute (that's by actual tallying on your contributions page) before reverting changes. If you're using some automated process or a bot - and, given that swift response, I suspect you are - please stop. It's not correctly identifying good from bad edits. Thanks. 71.9.8.150 (talk) 14:58, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail.

You've got spam. · AndonicO Hail! 13:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yay spam \o/ ...--Cometstyles 13:38, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
More "Spam, lovely Spam, wonderful Spam," for you. :) · AndonicO Hail! 13:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Just like to say thanks for all of the help that you have given me over my time at wikipedia and on the irc. If you ever need any help with anything just ask. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 18:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

WikiThanks
WikiThanks

Thank you, Cometstyles, for your support in my RfB. I appreciate your trust. Acalamari 22:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Powersurge

An article that you have been involved in editing, Powersurge, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powersurge. Thank you. Weltanschaunng 08:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! —ossmanntalk 17:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]