User talk:Colombiano21FARC Bloc(k)sI'm thinking about moving all of these pages so that the word "block" is replaced with the word "bloc." What do you think? --Descendall 05:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC) Seems like you're right. Thanks. --Colombiano21 18:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC) jose fernando torres varelaDo not add non sense to wikipedia,[1] even though you erased it from appearing in the article that difamation constitutes a blockable offense. please refrain from doing that, it's really unnecessary --I am greener than you! (Lima - Charlie - Over) 04:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
EPL activegot references??--76.19.149.244 (talk) 02:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Map of FARC frontsHi, do you have, by any chance, a map of all the localisation of FARC fronts ? Thanks Kormin (talk) 17:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
UnsourcedHi there, thanks for the message. Basically I am concerned about WP:BLP. Some things like "he is thought to be very dangerous" or "considered the most wanted" and other things like "he was involved in X massacre" cannot be done without a source and need to be removed so as not to open Wiki to liability. It could be defamation. If you can find a neutral source then we can add it back, no problem --Tangola (talk) 13:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC) ThanksFor your edits on the DI page. Juthani1 17:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Wholesale revertDo not make wholesale reverts like you did here, you removed good edits along with bad ones. Please take more care when you try to fix problems in the future as such whole reverting is unhelpfu, for instance you restored unsourced info that had been fact tagged since March and correctly deleted by me. You just seemed to walk all over my edits without even bothering to check them. Thanks, SqueakBox 13:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Re:US-Columbia FTAHey. Thanks for the suggestion, I took a look at it and it certainly needs a lot of work. I fixed a few things but I'll start major work on it when I finish reading up on the subject. If you take a look at it in a few days and let me know if you see any improvements. Thanks --Patrick (talk) 01:24, 10 September 2008 (UTC) Image Jacobo.jpg.hey son of a bitch, you is not no one to decide whether to delete my picture or not. Everyone has the right to know about Jacobo Arenas and the image is not violating copyright. So if you are jealous because my jodase image, that image is because it stays. if you delete it is to win the repudiation of Colombians not to leave an image of a deceased FARC leader. I do not want to support FARC EP but that Colombians live in a utopy where we revive our history. please leave my picture still. cabron --Hanita16 (talk) 01:24, 15 February 2009. (UTC)
Questions about ranks of FARC hostagesWhat's a "Patrullero", "Agente" and "Intendente"? I think that a "Professional Soldier" is basically a Private. In June 2001 and February 2009, the FARC released all the Patrulleros, Agentes and Professional Soldiers but they kept an Intendente named Alvaro Moreno. Are Patrulleros and Agente's lower ranking officers? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.127.203.135 (talk) 19:34, 14 October 2009 (UTC) Nomination of Wikimania 2007 for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikimania 2007 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikimania 2007 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ypnypn (talk) 21:20, 8 September 2013 (UTC) Nomination of Wikimania 2007 for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikimania 2007 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikimania 2007 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ypnypn (talk) 21:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC) Hi, |