User talk:Coin945/Archive 8
This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2022)
Hello againHello again. I just wanted to check in. It has been a while since I have talked to you and I just wanted to say that I hope you are doing well! Aoba47 (talk) 03:09, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2022)
Nomination of Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego? (Gameloft) for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego? (Gameloft) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego? (Gameloft) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Skipple ☎ 17:47, 12 August 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2022)
Hello, Coin945 Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Sarah Schneuwly -Schneider, and I thank you for your contributions. I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Torat Hamelekh, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source. If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) Sarah Schneuwly -Schneider (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
True Torah Jews Against Zionism moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, True Torah Jews Against Zionism, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " Integral Judaism moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Integral Judaism, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "
Panza Kick Boxing moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Panza Kick Boxing, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "
This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2022)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Panza Kick Boxing (August 22) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Panza Kick Boxing has been accepted Panza Kick Boxing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)August 2022Your edit to Zaark and the Night Team has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 20:39, 26 August 2022 (UTC) Final warningWithin the last month, you've had countless bad article creations. Articles sent to draft space, rejected drafts, etc. and for violating the basics too, like only adding a single source to an article, or having entire unsourced articles. Things you know better about as an editor who has been here for over a decade. And now you're violating WP:COPYVIO again too. I'm not sure why, but you've relapsed back into the habits that have gotten you warned and blocked many times in the past. Final warning - any more basic violations or COPYVIOs, and your account will be blocked again. It's not okay to make these sort of mistakes when you're being to prolific with your creations. It's exhausting the community's time and patience. Sergecross73 msg me 22:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2022)
DYK nomination of Jews of ColorHello! Your submission of Jews of Color at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! -- RoySmith (talk) 14:29, 31 August 2022 (UTC) DYK for Umma–Lagash warOn 2 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Umma–Lagash war, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Professor of History Lorenzo Kamel deems Umma–Lagash the first recorded war in human history? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Umma-Lagash war. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Umma–Lagash war), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 07:20, 4 September 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2022)
DYK for Jew of colorOn 7 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jew of color, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a report commissioned by the Jews of Color Initiative described "Jews of color" as "an imperfect, but useful umbrella term"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jews of Color. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jew of color), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 05:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2022)
DYK for Cluedo (Australian game show)On 13 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cluedo (Australian game show), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that audience members interrogated suspects in an Australian Cluedo game show based on the board game? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cluedo (Australian game show). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cluedo (Australian game show)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Schwede66 12:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC) New message from Narutolovehinata5Hello, Coin945. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Panza Kick Boxing.
Message added 09:36, 18 September 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:36, 18 September 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2022)
Ways to improve MéwiloHello, Coin945, Thank you for creating Méwilo. I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. VickKiang 11:23, 20 September 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2022)
Disambiguation link notification for October 8An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Written in Stone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Schwartz. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC) Rationalist Judaism moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Rationalist Judaism, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). One of the two current sources is a dead link. You really should have least 3 sources which go in-depth about the concept. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " Infobox television date formatThanks for your efforts in adding infoboxes to television articles. Per the first/last_aired parameter description in the template documentation, dates should use {{Start date|YYYY|MM|DD}} and {{End date|YYYY|MM|DD}} with df=y if day first (dmy) formatting is needed (see Template:Infobox television). Otherwise, when dates are not properly formatted, the article will end up in the maintenance category Category:Pages using infobox television with nonstandard dates for someone to come through and fix it. Since you're adding these infoboxes, it would be great if you could just make sure the date is properly formatted from the start. TIA. ButlerBlog (talk) 18:42, 9 October 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2022)
DYK for Panza Kick BoxingOn 13 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Panza Kick Boxing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that fighting video game Panza Kick Boxing was endorsed by a French kickboxing champion who also supplied technical advice? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Panza Kick Boxing. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Panza Kick Boxing), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 15An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cluedo (Australian game show), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Gregg and Good Morning Britain. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2022)
DYK for Nigel SavageOn 23 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nigel Savage, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that environmental activist Nigel Savage created Hazon after googling "Jewish food movement" and receiving zero search results? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nigel Savage. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nigel Savage), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2022)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2023)
Your draft article, Draft:Super Spy (video game)Hello, Coin945. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Super Spy". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:27, 4 January 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2023)
Rubbish bin and cluesHi! I meant nothing personal with my changes to Cluedo (Australian game show), and in fact most of the text was simply identical word for word to what is on Cluedo (British game show), like the Leslie Grantham stuff and so on, or at least that's how it read to me when comparing (like Grantham's asexual quote). So I didn't check the history to see who added what, just that they weren't actually about the Australian cast or creatives and thus misleading at best as the quotes weren't actually about the same production. Wouldn't it make more sense though by your own summary to just add those to the British page yourself? You have a better grasp of what you added and want to keep than I do, but none of it is actually about the Australian show unless, well, it's about the production of the Australian show, and it makes no real sense to talk about cast members of other versions if they weren't actually on the show the page is about. So I cut out anything not actually about the Australian show. "British cancellation" and legacy and likewise also don't fit here. Likewise the international stuff (maybe add to Cluedo (franchise) if you really don't want to lose it?) Checking the talk page for the British article, it looks like years ago it was the reverse and the Australian stuff was tucked onto the British article. I think at this point it makes the most sense for each page to be about the version that's actually the topic. That's what you yourself did with edits like this one, after all, now that I'm checking. -- Aleal (talk) 04:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC) Nomination of Big, Blonde and Beautiful for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big, Blonde and Beautiful is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big, Blonde and Beautiful until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 12:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2023)
Concern regarding Draft:Odilo of ValenceHello, Coin945. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Odilo of Valence, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:True Torah Jews Against ZionismHello, Coin945. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:True Torah Jews Against Zionism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 19 January 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2023)
Concern regarding Draft:Integral JudaismHello, Coin945. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Integral Judaism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:39, 9 February 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2023)
Your draft article, Draft:Odilo of ValenceHello, Coin945. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Odilo of Valence". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:37, 17 February 2023 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:True Torah Jews Against ZionismHello, Coin945. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "True Torah Jews Against Zionism". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 8, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 10, 2023)
Your draft article, Draft:Integral JudaismHello, Coin945. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Integral Judaism". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:45, 8 March 2023 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Rationalist JudaismHello, Coin945. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rationalist Judaism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 11, 2023)
Disambiguation link notification for March 16An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cluedo (Australian game show), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page This Morning. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 16 March 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 12, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 13, 2023)
Nomination of List of fastest-selling products for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fastest-selling products is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fastest-selling products (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Axem Titanium (talk) 17:39, 4 April 2023 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:BorisGodounov.jpgThanks for uploading File:BorisGodounov.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 8 April 2023 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Rationalist JudaismHello, Coin945. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rationalist Judaism". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 15, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 17, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 18, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 19, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 20, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 21, 2023)
Nomination of Alice in Wonderland (franchise) for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alice in Wonderland (franchise) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice in Wonderland (franchise) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:03, 22 May 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 22, 2023)
Discontent Content Issue 7
This week's article for improvement (week 23, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 24, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 25, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 26, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 27, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2023)
your split suggestion has elapsedLast year you suggested the episode summaries of Fake or Fortune? should be split into their own page. However, you never started a talk page topic where to discuss this proposal. Now I see your Thanks, CapnZapp (talk) 16:14, 20 July 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2023)
Disambiguation link notification for July 29An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Tearoom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twitch. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC) Promotional language in Reading Blaster: Invasion of the Word SnatchersAs you are an experienced and long-running editor, I thought I would bring to your attention that this article you just created right now is very promotional in tone. While the game is so old that it would be hard to say you are actually trying to promote it in some respect, sentences like "offers an exciting and interactive learning experience" and "valuable tool for educators and parents" set off promotional alarm bells. Even in the plot summary, words like "engaging" or "helpful" are not neutral language at all. If it was something you wrote yourself, then I would remind you that WP:PEACOCK terms are not allowed. "Exciting" or "valuable" belongs in critical reception inside a quote. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:52, 29 July 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2023)
Disambiguation link notification for August 19An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 19 August 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2023)
Software MacKiev moved to draftspaceThanks for your contributions to Software MacKiev. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 15:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC) The article Fate by Numbers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 August 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2023)
Nomination of Ant Raid for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ant Raid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ant Raid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. VRXCES (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2023)
The page Dream League Soccer has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information. Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2023)
"L.A. Blaster" listed at Redirects for discussionThe redirect L.A. Blaster has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 12 § L.A. Blaster until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2023)
This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2023)
|