User talk:Coin945/Archive 7This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2019)
DYK for Piposh (2019 video game)On 14 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Piposh (2019 video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Israeli video game Piposh, to be released in 2019, will be a reboot of the original 1999 game of the same name? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Piposh (2019 video game). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Piposh (2019 video game)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 00:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC) Thank you for creating the article for the above game. It was one of my absolutely favorites growing up. I had actually installed an emulator version to my laptop, but it was unfortunately wiped when I had to get it repaired. Hope you are doing well. Aoba47 (talk) 22:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 8, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2019)
Tajemnica Statuetki
Orphaned non-free image File:Carmen Sandiego 2019 logo.pngThanks for uploading File:Carmen Sandiego 2019 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC) Pilgrim: Faith as a WeaponHello: The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Pilgrim: Faith as a Weapon has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. You will notice that I have added a "clarify" tag in the Gameplay section: "regardless of where the player is,[clarification needed] Disc 1 must be inserted every time they boot up the game." This is unclear. I have "hidden" text in the Reception section that is not specific to this game, where the Google translation was gibberish and did not support the text, or where the sites would not load so the text could not be verified. You can see this in Edit mode. I draw your attention to this Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Sources which deals with sources considered "reliable" (by consensus) in video game articles. Many of the sources you cite in this section come from mobygames.com which is not considered reliable. I notice there is lengthy discussion on the article's talk page about the issue of reliability, so perhaps you are aware of the problem with this site. These will need to be deleted or more "reliable" sources found before the article will pass GA, I suspect. On the whole, the Reception section is far too long, in my opinion. As often happens with these articles many editors continue to add reviews they have unearthed, important or not, in a seeming quest to add absolutely everything ever written about the subject. This just results in a bloated, unreadable article. I suspect one of the problems you have encountered with this article is there are very few reviews in English. But having to rely on Google translations of articles in other languages creates its own set of issues. A few I looked at were basically gibberish and would not pass the "reliability" test. I don't know if a GA reviewer would accept this type of review. Hopefully you know or can find another editor with experience with these issues who can help you resolve these problems. Best of luck, Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:33, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 10, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 11, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 12, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 13, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 14, 2019)
Confirm Involvement in WikiProject DisneyHello Coin945! I'm a new member of the Disney WikiProject. I'm trying to confirm who is still interested in the WikiProject in hopes to build a team of that can revamp the project. Please let me know if you would like to stay on the list of active members, or if I can go ahead and move to you the list of inactive members. You can do so by replying to this message and including the ImprovementsHi there, do you have anything that could improve Shadow: War of Succession? 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:EC9B:65F6:747A:9E1C (talk) 01:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 15, 2019)
The article Stratogon Entertainment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing Re:Adventure articlesHey! Just wanted to thank you for all the hard work you've done expanding Wikipedia's adventure game coverage. It's really amazing just how many articles you've made in such a short time. You even created Secrets of the Luxor, which I've been thinking about starting for over a year! And an especially big thank-you for the help on Faust (video game)—some of those sources you dug up are things I never would have found on my own. I plan to take that article to GAN in the next month or two, after I finish expanding it. Anyway, here's a barnstar for your tireless contributions! JimmyBlackwing (talk) 10:43, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
The article Chopper (video game) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2019)
Johnny MnemonicHey Coin if you want to contribute with the Johnny Mnemonic draft you can also help add some things into the body. Especially if they are non-English sources. I can see this being created with the same intent as Phantasmagoria (video game) as well as possibly needing something special to be done to show the gameplay. GamerPro64 19:23, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 18, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 19, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 20, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 21, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 22, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 23, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 24, 2019)
Nomination of Beat Hazard for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beat Hazard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beat Hazard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella Velella Talk 18:46, 13 June 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 25, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 26, 2019)
Orphaned non-free image File:Rugrats All Grown Up comparison.pngThanks for uploading File:Rugrats All Grown Up comparison.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 27, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2019)
Invitation to project revivalDear user, I, with Willbb234, are a attempting to revive the Wikiproject Requested Articles, of which you are a member. If you wish to be a part of our effort, feel free to add your signature in it's talk page. Best regards, Eni vak (speak) 16:20, 17 August 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2019)
Hello, Coin945, Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-) I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Yearn2Learn, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article. If you wish to prevent the deletion:
But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means. If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Onel5969 TT me 00:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of El Tesoro de Isla Alcachofa for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article El Tesoro de Isla Alcachofa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Tesoro de Isla Alcachofa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 13:58, 6 September 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2019)
Nomination of Quest for the Code for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quest for the Code is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quest for the Code until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC) Nomination of Dbaza's Diabetes Education for Kids for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dbaza's Diabetes Education for Kids is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dbaza's Diabetes Education for Kids until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC) RE:Gry OnlineGreat to hear that you got Gry accepted as a reliable source! I've used it a few times in the past, but maybe I should look into it more. I axed that particular Gry reference on Igor because it was part of the Gry encyclopedia, and I assumed that it was (like with Giant Bomb) a user-generated section of the site. It doesn't seem like Igor was ever released in Poland, so I wasn't sure what else it could've been but an unofficial thing created by fans. If it's actually editorial content, I'll be sure to re-add it. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 02:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2019)
A barnstar for you!
This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2019)
Bracken Tor moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Bracken Tor, does not have enough sources or confirmed information to remain published. Please attempt to at least begin the currently empty sections, and don't forget to use reliable sources. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2019)
ArbCom 2019 election voter messageThis week's article for improvement (week 48, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2019)
Ways to improve AdibouHello, Coin945, Thank you for creating Adibou. I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2020)
The article Ant Raid has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing The article Hank Hazard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing The article Infinity Field has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing The article Pixel Defenders Puzzle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2020)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Oregon Trail (2011 game).jpgThanks for uploading File:The Oregon Trail (2011 game).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC) The article Regnum (video game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2020)
Nomination of Cat people and dog people for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cat people and dog people is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat people and dog people (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 20:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 8, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2020)
Berlin ConnectionHi Coin945, I feel honored — I just came across — that you put up a Berlin Connection (BC) Wikipedia page and already putting together such an amount of sources (some of them I never had seen before). I am Eku Wand author, designer, producer and publisher (via eku interactive) of the CD-ROM Adventure-Thriller Berlin Connection (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Connection). How can I help you to improve the quality of your article? I can see some mistakes immediately starting from wrong spelling of my name: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eku_Wand and the wrong mentioning of my former multimedia company Pixelpark: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixelpark (which now is: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digitas_Pixelpark). I could help finding relevant links for you in German or English language (such as: https://books.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/arthistoricum/catalog/book/265 ; https://books.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/arthistoricum/reader/download/265/265-17-77884-1-10-20170523.pdf), other sources (such as registry of Berlin Connection in the German National Library) and upload proper high resolution cover shots etc. Another English weblink with wrong release date (proper release year is 1998): https://macintoshgarden.org/games/berlin-connection I could also help finding another German Wikipedia editor to write the german Wikipedia page first and then go back and forth with you on syncing both sides? Let me know. As I am not an advanced Wikipedia editor (and not good in proper formatting either) please advise on how I can help without violating Wikipedia netiquette but improving the article's quality and importance on scale!? … you can also write to mailto:mail@ekuwand.com as I am unsure if this is the right way to get in contact with you in here. Sorry. Regards Eku ekuwand 13:16, 29 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekuwand (talk • contribs)
Alright — I will proceed as suggested. Thank you for your feedback. --Ekuwand (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 10, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 11, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 12, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 13, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 15, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2020)
Draft:Bracken Tor concernHi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bracken Tor, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Bracken TorHello, Coin945. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bracken Tor". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! TheImaCow (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2020 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 18, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 19, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 20, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 21, 2020)
"Italpinas Euroasian Design and Eco-Development Corporatio" listed at Redirects for discussionA discussion is taking place to address the redirect Italpinas Euroasian Design and Eco-Development Corporatio. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 22#Italpinas Euroasian Design and Eco-Development Corporatio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 15:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 22, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 23, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 24, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 25, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 26, 2020)
Tajemnica Statuetki for GAImpressive work, have you cosnidered WP:GAN? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
I am about to write an article about the first one and I noticed this article of yours. I think it should be merged to Kayko and Kokosh, as there is no official 'series'. The games were made by at least two if not more different companies, and the grouping is unofficial. The content can be preserved in the article for the comics which are the main franchise, but I don't think the list makes sense as a stand alone article. If you reply here, please ping me. Cheers,--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 27, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2020)
Orphaned non-free image File:166087-wooden-ships-iron-men-dos-front-cover.pngThanks for uploading File:166087-wooden-ships-iron-men-dos-front-cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 10 July 2020 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2020)
Orphaned non-free image File:E.X. Troopers logo.jpgThanks for uploading File:E.X. Troopers logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2020)
Les ManleyYou got it. Les Manley in: Search for the King and Les Manley in: Lost in L.A.. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 07:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2020)
Living books sources text
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-04-21-fi-48662-story.html :
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1996-08-26-fi-37811-story.html :
https://www.nytimes.com/1995/09/11/business/broderbund-casts-itself-as-a-studio.html :
--PresN 03:15, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2020)
Copyright problem on Living BooksContent you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://wanderfulstorybooks.com/news.html and https://web.archive.org/web/20170306011835/http://www.iier.waier.org.au/iier13/unsworth.html, which are not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed and I paraphrased some. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 13:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
@Diannaa: Please look a bit closer at your revert. Your edit is actually reversing copyediting I have created and removing images I have sourced and added. It is confusing me while in the middle of an edit. Please let me post my edit as is, and then add your copyedits on top.--Coin945 (talk) 13:56, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2020)
Hey! Yeah, I can't deny that the history of The Learning Company is fascinating, especially with how its downfall essentially marked the end of the booming educational game market. I've had to cover Mattel's game-industry antics in a few articles I've worked on in the past, simply because the fallout was so large and impacted so many other games and companies. It's a big subject. Personally, I just don't feel qualified to tackle something of that scale and scope. I favor more niche subjects that I can cover exhaustively (Runaway: A Road Adventure is a recent example of this) rather than vast, sweeping topics like you'd get with a page about a game genre, a console or a huge corporation. Parsing that much information is just overwhelming to me. Plus, I've mainly been editing Wikipedia lately to blow off steam and pass the time, so I've stuck to low-effort side projects (like filling out Template:Gary Grigsby) when I edit at all. That said, I do wish you luck with this huge project—hopefully there are others on WPVG who'd be more willing than I am to take something like this on! JimmyBlackwing (talk) 00:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC) Hi @JimmyBlackwing:, thank you for your reply. I can appreciate what you're saying. The good news is that I've done all the hard research and structuring of the article's scope. I've bashed out a very rough draft by placing the content and sources into an outline of the article. All if needs now is a copyedit and once over to finesse the article into cohesive sentences. I wonder if you'd be keen to give it a crack? I'm mentally exhausted after all that and would love your expertise. Orphaned non-free image File:Living Books proximity to CD-ROM.pngThanks for uploading File:Living Books proximity to CD-ROM.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Living Books speed test.pngThanks for uploading File:Living Books speed test.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2020)
Disambiguation link notification for November 10Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Learning Company (formerly SoftKey), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 10 November 2020 (UTC) Chewy: Esc from F5Hello. Unfortunately one or more of your recent contributions to Chewy: Esc from F5 have been reverted. Even though this edit was made in good-faith, the lead does not require citations unless contentious. Thank you for adding the image. A copy of your edit is available on the article’s edit history. For more general advice on editing see the Contributing to Wikipedia page. If you have any questions, please leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. AussieWikiDan (talk) 12:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC) Orbits: Voyage Through the Solar System moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Orbits: Voyage Through the Solar System, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2020)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageThis week's article for improvement (week 49, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2020)
DYK for Living BooksOn 10 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Living Books, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Los Angeles Times criticized Disney for contracting their interactive storybooks to independent studios, deeming their series "a mere imitation" of Broderbund's Living Books format? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Living Books. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Living Books), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. —valereee (talk) 12:02, 10 December 2020 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2020)
Nomination of DragonVale for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article DragonVale, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted. The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DragonVale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:13, 21 December 2020 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 53, 2020)
The article Under the Oak Tree has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2021)
Copyright problem on The Learning Company (formerly SoftKey)Hi there. While working on The Learning Company (formerly SoftKey), I noticed that much of the content you added in November is in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Specifically, much of the article text was copied and pasted directly from sources. I had to remove the copyrighted text, but I paraphrased and kept as much as I could. I would advise you to be very careful not to add copyrighted content to Wikipedia going forward, lest this become a recurring issue. — The Only Zac (talk) 03:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2021)
The article Loves Me, Loves Me Not has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2021)
Requests for MasterClass articleHello! My name is Alyssa and I work for MasterClass. I've disclosed this on my profile and at Talk:MasterClass, where I've proposed some changes to correct and bring the article up to date. More specifically, I've asked to fix language about the company's founding and remove a sentence which is not specifically confirmed by sourcing. I saw you've edited the article before, from the beginning! Thanks for this. Do you have a moment to review my requests on the article's talk page? MC Alyssa (talk) 00:49, 3 February 2021 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2021)
"Letterbox" listed at Redirects for discussionA discussion is taking place to address the redirect Letterbox. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#Letterbox until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC) Nomination of Cover Orange for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cover Orange is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cover Orange until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 18:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC) Nomination of Pixel Defenders Puzzle for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pixel Defenders Puzzle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixel Defenders Puzzle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pinktoebeans (talk) 13:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 8, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 10, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 11, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 12, 2021)
Orphaned non-free image File:Under the Sea.oggThanks for uploading File:Under the Sea.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 13, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 14, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 15, 2021)
Mass Nomination of Articles for AfDHi @Coin945, before nominating more old unsourced articles please, please have a look at Wikipedia:BEFORE - you are urged to look for sources for each and every of your articles you want to nominate for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:07, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Orbits: Voyage Through the Solar SystemHello, Coin945. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Orbits: Voyage Through the Solar System, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC) Thankyou
This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2021)
A barnstar for you!
This week's article for improvement (week 17, 2021)
Retro video gamesIf you're interested, these are mostly games from the 1980s but a few from the 1990s, which might have potential based on the number of reviews I found for them. I had previously posted this on the VG WP talk page: BOZ (talk) 21:54, 28 April 2021 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 18, 2021)
Nomination of Casey's Contraptions for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casey's Contraptions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey's Contraptions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 22:05, 8 May 2021 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 19, 2021)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Where in Europe Title Card.jpgThank you for uploading File:Where in Europe Title Card.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Also: This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 May 2021 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 20, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 21, 2021)
A cup of coffee for you!
This week's article for improvement (week 22, 2021)
Ways to improve Elevate (video game)Hello, Coin945, Thank you for creating Elevate (video game). I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Whiteguru (talk) 08:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 23, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 24, 2021)
Canonical painting modes of the Renaissance moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Canonical painting modes of the Renaissance, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " most-viewed stubHi. Thanks for the notice, but could you recheck which is the most-viewed stub for WikiProject Languages? The one you noted was mislabeled a stub (it was rated C class by other projects). Or maybe leave a link for where we can check for ourselves? I'd like to review the top half dozen or so, and expand those I know something about. Thanks, — kwami (talk) 02:19, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! — kwami (talk) 05:20, 19 June 2021 (UTC) You'd better write that redlink sharpish or I will revert all these additions. Johnbod (talk) 17:12, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 25, 2021)
Discontent Content Issue 5
This week's article for improvement (week 26, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 27, 2021)
Elements talkLooks like here you removed my 10:15 post. Was that intentionally? Anyway, please reinstall. -DePiep (talk) 14:33, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2021)
Incomplete DYK nominationHello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Typequick at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC) Ways to improve Detective Grimoire (series)Hello, Coin945, Thank you for creating Detective Grimoire (series). I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Whiteguru (talk) 21:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC) DYK nomination of TypequickHello! Your submission of Typequick at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! -- RoySmith (talk) 03:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC) -- RoySmith (talk) 03:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2021)
Discontent Content Issue 6
This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2021)
Reference please!!! Johnbod (talk) 17:33, 11 August 2021 (UTC) Nomination of Canonical painting modes of the Renaissance for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canonical painting modes of the Renaissance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canonical painting modes of the Renaissance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 19:12, 11 August 2021 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2021)
Nomination of What's done is done for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article What's done is done is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What's done is done (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 18:17, 13 September 2021 (UTC) NSYNC article creationHi, I appreciate your creation of NSYNC-related articles. I am just concerned about whether it will be enough to meet WP:NSONG since there is no significant independent coverage of "Something Like You" and That’s When I’ll Stop Loving You", and has not received any mainstream chart or award recognition. I saw a Rolling Stone source primarily discussing "Digital Get Down" so maybe that could be a potential article for creation instead. Also the title for "That’s When I’ll Stop Loving You" contains two WP:CURLY quotations such as this (’) instead of straight quotations such as this ('). Curly quotations are primarily not used in Wikipedia, and has caused the article in this revision of No Strings Attached to appear with a WP:REDLINK. Maybe you could request a page move without the curly quotations such as like this (That’s When I’ll Stop Loving You to This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2021)
Orphaned non-free image File:Carmen Sandiego Space.jpgThanks for uploading File:Carmen Sandiego Space.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 23 September 2021 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2021)
Orphaned non-free image File:Joseph, King of Dreams linetest.ogvThanks for uploading File:Joseph, King of Dreams linetest.ogv. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2021)
The file File:I Just Can't Wait to Be King.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2021)
Nomination of Chopper (video game) for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chopper (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chopper (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DocFreeman24 (talk) 02:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2021)
The file File:A Guy Like You.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC) File:God Help The Outcasts - Der Glockner.ogg listed for discussionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:God Help The Outcasts - Der Glockner.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2021)
Hi, You used "google translate" as references, and now the links are thoroughly dead. Can you restore the references? I cannot because the html addresses seem to be nonenglish andd are unreadble to me. Loew Galitz (talk) 05:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC) The file File:Cover of Kewala's Typing Adventure - Japan version.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing Also: This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC) The file File:Be Prepared reprise.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC) File:God Help the Outcasts scene.png listed for discussionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:God Help the Outcasts scene.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2021)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter messageNomination of Deliver Us (The Prince of Egypt song) for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deliver Us (The Prince of Egypt song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deliver Us (The Prince of Egypt song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Binksternet (talk) 20:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2021)
This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2022)
Your draft article, Draft:Orbits: Voyage Through the Solar SystemHello, Coin945. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Orbits: Voyage Through the Solar System". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:29, 8 January 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2022)
Orphaned non-free image File:Carmen Sandiego Space.jpgThanks for uploading File:Carmen Sandiego Space.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2022)
Speedy deletion nomination of JumpStart ToddlersHello, Coin945, Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions. I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, JumpStart Toddlers, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator. For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. John B123 (talk) 09:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2022)
Master of Dimensions moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Master of Dimensions, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "
Super Spy (video game) moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Super Spy (video game), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2022)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Master of Dimensions has been accepted Master of Dimensions, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2022)
DYK for JumpStart ToddlersOn 11 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article JumpStart Toddlers, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Chicago Sun-Times credits JumpStart Toddlers as the first video game targeted towards babies? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/JumpStart Toddlers. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, JumpStart Toddlers), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 8, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 10, 2022)
The file File:Friend Like Me.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 11, 2022)
Reason for Removed Redirect?Hello.Tonka Search & Rescue was redirected to Hasbro Interactive due to a failure of WP:PRODUCT. I noticed that you have removed this redirect and i cannot find prior discussion for this decision.. Can you please clarify why this redirect was made? PerryPerryD Talk To Me 19:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 12, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 13, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 14, 2022)
Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon - April 22nd - 2PM EST
-- Environment of New York City Task Force This week's article for improvement (week 15, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2022)
Hi--about this edit, please see MOS:NOSECTIONLINKS. Thx. Drmies (talk) 14:33, 22 April 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 17, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 18, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 19, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 20, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 21, 2022)
I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, Coin945 Thank you for creating J.P. Morgan Saves the Nation. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) North8000 (talk) 02:43, 28 May 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 22, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 23, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 24, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 25, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 26, 2022)
Concern regarding Draft:Super Spy (video game)Hello, Coin945. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Super Spy (video game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 27, 2022)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Super Spy (video game) (July 4) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Long talk pageHello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines: "Large talk pages are difficult to read and load slowly over slow connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." – this talk page is 533.6 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:28, 4 July 2022 (UTC) |