|
User talk:Codrinb/Archive 3
Helmet of Iron GatesI don't have materials on the helmet per se, but on interpreting the iconographic elements. I will add the relevant text and references to your draft. Daizus (talk) 01:51, 17 March 2011 (UTC) DYK for Dacian Draco
The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Dacian dracoSalut! Oho, de atat de multa vreme am upload-at poza, ca am uitat de ea! Habar n-am de unde e, cred ca s-a si inchis site-ul. Eu am pus-o in ideea ca e un steag al unei natii, deci nu e cu copyright. Daca e sa "pierdem" specimenul asta, am putea... improviza luand elementul din stema actuala a Clujului (orasul), ca are un dragon dacic pe fond galben. Sau nu e o reprezentare grozava acolo? Acea imagine, fiind o stema, clar n-are problee de copyright, si am utea lua elemente din ea; nu? --ES Vic (talk) 12:29, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Dacian Draco
The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Dacian dracoSalut! Oho, de atat de multa vreme am upload-at poza, ca am uitat de ea! Habar n-am de unde e, cred ca s-a si inchis site-ul. Eu am pus-o in ideea ca e un steag al unei natii, deci nu e cu copyright. Daca e sa "pierdem" specimenul asta, am putea... improviza luand elementul din stema actuala a Clujului (orasul), ca are un dragon dacic pe fond galben. Sau nu e o reprezentare grozava acolo? Acea imagine, fiind o stema, clar n-are problee de copyright, si am utea lua elemente din ea; nu? --ES Vic (talk) 12:29, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Celts in Transylvania
Celts in TransylvaniaHi, I'm just starting the copyedit on Celts in Transylvania and had a thought. The article would look much better if there was an infobox next to the lead. I'm sure that there a number of suitable ones out there. Please wait until I've copyedited the lead before adding it. Another comment "Celts of Transylvania" is more grammatically correct than "Celts in Transylvania" so you might want to move the page accordingly. Best, ► Philg88 ◄
TemplateHave a look at this template which I can copy and modify to make it Dacia (if that's what you want). ► Philg88 ◄
DaciaThanks for your note. I'm not at all competent to work on Dacian history, but curiosity, arising out of reading Hadrian's Memoirs, led me to a site or two, and I must have found some entries stylistically messy enough to need editing. Good luck with your endeavors! tjeffers@wi.rr.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tljeffers (talk • contribs) 23:26, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Page MoveJust in case you didn't see the page move suggestion I made above as I added it into a previous message. ► Philg88 ◄
English draws a very fine line between "in" and "of" — using in immediately begs the question "What are they doing there?" rather than, (when "of" is used), indicating that they were/are an ethnic group there. Using "of" also makes the lead sentence of the article scan better. On the template front, have a look here. You will need to decide which topics you want (Kings, tribes etc) because adding all the stuff from the Dacia topics template would make it about 1 metre (3 ft 3 in) long. ► Philg88 ◄
25 results for Celts in Transylvania vs 7 results for Celts of Transylvania. So, I don't know. I'll let you decide since you are more experienced with Wikipedia and have better command of English On the template, I created a first draft in your page, see what you think. And thanks again! --Codrin.B (talk) 15:41, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
OK, leave it as "in", no big deal really.<br\> Good work on the template, looks great. I have moved it into the main space as {{Dacia series}} as some car has already bagged plain Dacia. Best ► Philg88 ◄ Nice commune articleHow about Coronini? Mehadia is also not bad, though it only covers the titular village; same with Slava Cercheză, Chilia Veche and Sarichioi. Bazna is by me, a more modest effort. Biertan is a start. Sâncraiu is even more rudimentary. Anyway, they do exist, but in fairly small numbers. If you were thinking of a particular commune, let me know and perhaps I can help. - Biruitorul Talk 20:05, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
List of historical monuments in RomaniaThank you for your message. I do not think it is possible (in Wiki project) to have a list with a total of 29,540 entries, or split in Counties, hundreds or thousands of entries! On the other hand, it would be useless as long as we have an easy access to this list actualised by Romanian Minister of Culture: http://arhiva.cultura.ro/Files/GenericFiles/LMI-2010.pdf Anyhow, in order to have a geographical image, I am going to update the article with the total number of monuments for each County. (Rgvis (talk) 07:36, 17 April 2011 (UTC)) List of castraA very precise list of romanian Castra can be found on CIMEC.CristianChirita (talk) 21:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC) I have some pictures of castra from: Arrutela, Potaissa, Gilau,Troesmiss, DinogetiaCristianChirita (talk) 21:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC) i wish i could find the Cernavoda site. It woul be usefull to find some volunteers to make some pictures using data from Cimec for old roman limes: Trajan Limes in Dobruja, Antharic wall in Moldavia till Ucraine, Constantine wall (brazda lui Novac) from Drobeta to Siret. Also some pictures of railroad constructed on the limes transaulutus.
Proposal for a new projectIt would be usefull, i'll make some pictures when i'll have some time, of the cave churches from Buzau county from II-IV Century, there are very much similarities with the church caves from Bulgaria (Aladza) and from Murfatlar cave churches CristianChirita (talk) 21:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Celts in Transylvania
The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Images will be deletedNo OTRS permission has been received for your uploads to Commons from the Detroit Institute of Art, such as File:Helmet of Iron Gates at Detroit Institute of Arts, accession 56.18-S1.jpg. If nothing is received in a week they will be deleted. – Adrignola talk 19:44, 5 May 2011 (UTC) Imagini TezaurThe MNIR Pictures are coming soon.CristianChirita (talk) 21:21, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
FOPI apologize for writing in romanian on en.wiki: Eu vad lucrurile astfel: Pana acum se pare ca fotografiatul in locuri publice este nereglementat dupa revolutie. Reglementarile in vigoare par a fi: DECRET nr. 780 din 20 decembrie 1963 si Decretului nr. 332/1958 vezi http://forum.fotovest.ro/viewtopic.php?f=73&t=1071si http://www.avocatnet.ro/content/forum%7CdisplayTopicPage/topicID_14504/.html
Din punctul meu de vedere de nespecialist, pentru ca lucrarile de arta sa fie protejate, trubuie sa aiba la vedere un indicator cu interdictia de a fotografia:
desigur toate acestea pot fi discutate pe FOP dar nu am prea mult timp. Din moment ce google poate, putem si noi:)CristianChirita (talk) Mai sunt si puncte de vedere ale fotografilor http://oskar.ro/blog.php?id=1103
GiridavaDid you ever plan to finish Giridava? I saw that it had many empty sections and felt bad as I couldn't help. ceranthor 00:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
AnonWhat is your opinion of Lucian Boia's thesis in History and Myth in Romanian Consciousness that the obsession with Dacia is very unhealthy? Where were the Dacians between AD 271 and the 13th century? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.140.80 (talk) 06:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
We're recruiting art lovers!
Editor reviewAs a fairly new editor I noticed the "Editor review" section of the community pages only yesterday. Looking down the list of editors requesting feedback I could see that some requests had been submitted a long time ago, including yours in January. Before requesting a review myself I thought I would attempt one or two reviews, and you will find I have made some comments under your request. My guess is that you know a lot more about Wikipedia, how it works and what goes on behind the scenes than I do. All that I saw of your work seemed good to me with my limited experience and I think that the Encyclopedia is enhanced by your actions. Well done! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:54, 19 June 2011 (UTC) EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor reviewThis is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 26 June 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding IssueGreetings! I have noticed that some of the Dacian town's categories are wrong, indicating them as being Romanian ruins or archaeological sites, while on the maps they appear to have been in Bulgaria. Here are the maps I have seen - [2], [3]. Some of the towns are not located on those maps (or I haven't seen them), so can you please check tham out and correct the categories if there are other towns, situated in Bulgaria and not in Romania. Here are the towns I have corrected so far - Giridava, Scaidava, Bregedava, Itadava, Keiladeva and Danedevae. Also, I have doubts about Murideva - on the first map it appears on the border between Bulgaria and Romania but I cannot say on which side of the border; on the second one, it is clearly within Bulgaria. Since you are more competent on the matter, see what you will find for that particular town and if is indeed in Bulgaria, correct that category. Regards, --Gligan (talk) 13:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Dacian bracelets
Materialscientist (talk) 16:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC) Dacia, Moesia... yes, I'm interested, but......nivelul meu in Engleza este total insuficient, pe acest plan va trebui sa ma ajutati. Ca istoric, pot participa, dar in româneste. Best regards, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 16:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC) Battle of GataeYou hit me up about this article: Battle_of_Gatae I did not write that article, I just did cleanup on it. I'd say it's a candidate for deletion. Stoph (talk) 19:29, 14 October 2011 (UTC) You're welcomeYou're welcome! In early September I expanded the article Dromichaetes and now it has one section on Helis. There's a short discussion there. I found a lot about Sboryanovo and Sveshtari, but not so much about the north-Danubian contemporary settlements. Maybe you can wiki-link some of those proposals to the relevant archaeological sites (now they point to modern villages and towns). Also if you can improve or expand the text it would be great. Thank you in advance. Daizus (talk) 15:17, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
VandalismHello, I'm doing fine, sorry it took so long to reply. If that kind of thing happens again, there are two things to keep in mind. First, strike while the iron is hot. The vandalism there was two months old; for administrators to care, it needs to be recent (say, under 2 days old) or ongoing. Second, I would recommend either WP:AIV or WP:ANI. Either of those will hopefully yield a quick and decisive result. - Biruitorul Talk 17:16, 28 October 2011 (UTC) Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Books on DaciaCategory:Books on Dacia, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 15:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:06, 16 November 2011 (UTC) Wiki project DaciaHello, Iam interesting about wiki project Dacia. Do you have any idea how can I be helpful and which topics you need to expand? Thx. About article "Antes", you put "citation need" tags to almost all sentences and told that its POV. Its not POV, Its mostly from this book: http://books.google.com/books?id=t124cP06gg0C&pg=PA39&dq=%22antes%22+slavs&hl=sk&ei=OSLKTvL4B8fs-gaRl_HLBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22antes%22%20slavs&f=false and I saw an old book about Antes, there were next informations from this article but I have forgotten the name of this book (but i think that Francis Dvornik was the author)... Have a nice day. --Samofi (talk) 10:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Talkback Message added 16:38, 21 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Hi. I think you have been involved a lot with the GA of Roman Dacia. We need help to salvage the article. Thanks. Codrin.B (talk) 16:38, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Alexander John Cuza vs Alexandru Ioan CuzaPlease can you say your option about Alexander John Cuza vs Alexandru Ioan Cuza at Talk:Alexander_John_Cuza#Requested_move. -- Thanks, Saturnian (talk) 15:41, 2 December 2011 (UTC) Related comment to the above re: ANII saw your response on ANI, Codrin, and I wanted to reply, so in the interest of complying to the extent of not exacerbating the situation on ANI, I'll respond here. However, let me posit the reverse position to yours: If it's the same thing, why is Saturnian so hell-bent on changing it against consensus if there's nothing wrong with the way it is? The titles used currently are not redirects, and seem to be indicative of English-language usage (particularly the "I" vs "J"). Many other historical figures also have their names rendered differently in different languages without charges of "dafamation" by a third party. That includes not only biblical figures (whose names went through Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek and Latin before they got anywhere near what we have today), as well as every English-alphabet native person on a non-English WP, and vice-versa. So what seems like a small issue is really a lot bigger. Why? Well, when we start using non-standard spellings, it creates issues. My English layout keyboard won't even let me natively input accents for Spanish and French, much less Cyrillic, Hebrew, Greek, or CJK characters (the latter of which are horrific with homophones). So unless we use English conventions on English WP as per the MOS and other related policies and guidelines, I (the general user) can't find certain topics. Therefore, the accessibility and utility of English WP as a whole is directly impacted. That's the large scale. The small scale is that you are likely unaware that the Romania-related articles the Cuza issue stems from were actually secondary items for me; I came across this situation because Saturnian made two changes to Cuza's entry on List of Freemasons, made the hyperbolic claim that using the English language spelling was "defamatory" to the subject, offered no support for the position, and stopped just short of a 3RR after two different editors (myself being #2, not #1) reverted his changes. It would be my contention, therefore, that rather than looking at this as a blip on the screen of the wide view of Saturnian's otherwise good contribs, Saturnian is instead marring his record with this behavior. Length of service does not and never has excused unacceptable behavior on a project, such as, well, canvassing. MSJapan (talk) 02:47, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Re: Invitation to WikiProject DaciaHi Codrinb, Thanks for the invitation to join WP:DACIA. Unfortunately, I will have to decline, as my focus is broadly on Roman & Byzantine history, not on any specific region. I thought I could help rewriting the Roman Dacia article as I have written history books and felt that this was something I could contribute to. Thanks anyway. Oatley2112 (talk) 05:22, 5 December 2011 (UTC) Replaceable fair use File:Santul Mare Map from 1960s Archaeological Campaign.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Santul Mare Map from 1960s Archaeological Campaign.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:10, 8 December 2011 (UTC) Finished editing Roman DaciaHi Codrinb, I have finished rewording and placing sources and citations for the Roman Dacia page. The article is almost ready to go! There are only a few itmes which have been flagged as dubious which remain, but require someone with more knowledge of these matters than I to review and correct. Oatley2112 (talk) 13:44, 11 December 2011 (UTC) ReplyYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Slovenski Volk (talk) 12:57, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC) Thank......you for inviting me to join Dacia project. Unfortunatelly, at the moment I'm mostly out of time but I'll keep it in mind for future. Regards Zenanarh (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2011 (UTC) Roman Dacia has been cleaned up and is now back to the main space. Could you give it a second review for the WP:GOOD? Thanks!--Codrin.B (talk) 05:22, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited List of reconstructed Dacian words, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mureş (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 26 December 2011 (UTC) Bronze Age in RomaniaHello. I completed a copy edit of the article Bronze Age in Romania as per your copy edit request. However, I will warn you that there were many sentences that I could not grasp the meaning off, and so I left them as they were and added a "Clarify" tag at the end of them. I've done my best with what is there and I added some tags to direct editors as to what else needs to be done. I hope that helps you out in moving the article forward. --Tea with toast (話) 06:27, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited Bronze Age in Romania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Poppies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 5 January 2012 (UTC) I hope you enjoy beer!
BanatHi. You have answer on my talk page. PANONIAN 20:01, 9 January 2012 (UTC) Sure no problem,it would be my pleasure! PS: My Mother is originally from Romania --Cormag100 (talk) 17:17, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC) Hi. I've removed a number of the additions you made to Dacia (disambiguation), as they had no target links in them. The purpose of a Disambiguation page is to link existing articles of the same (or very similar) title, and not to list all uses of the name in question. So if a usage of the word does not have a Wikipedia article, it does not get an entry in a disambiguation page. Also, an entry can be made to an article of a different title, provided the target article actually describes the name in question - but if it doesn't, again it should not have an entry in the disambiguation page. It's worth having a read of WP:DAB to get a feel for how disambiguation pages are used - and if you need any help, my Talk page is always open. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Just to try to expand on what I'm saying, the purpose of a disambig page is to help people searching for articles about a topic, so lets put ourselves in the position of someone looking for articles about Roman Dacia. If we have all those multiple links, they'll see the disambig page and think...
You see the problem? Without those extra links, someone searching will find only links to articles we actually have, and won't waste time following lots of links to the same thing. If there is extra information you want to add about those provinces and their dates, etc, that should go in the Roman Dacia article itself, not on the disambig page - there should be no information on a disambig page that is not in the target article. Anyway, as I say, if you're really not understanding this properly, please do ask - either here, on my Talk page, or on the article Talk page -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi, since your name's down on this project, I'm just writing to let you know that there's a discussion going on at the moment on how to format events – and in particular, events that go on for multiple days – on year pages. Your input would be appreciated. — Smjg (talk) 18:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC) M-am întors si am lucrat !Buna ziua, iata harta în engleza : Toate bune, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 19:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC) DaciaDone! ;) Alexcoldcasefan (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited Carpi (people), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Romans and Niculescu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 21 January 2012 (UTC) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Hi! I noticed you created {{User WP Romania}} not too long ago, but there is a already a template {{User WikiProject Romania}}. Do you mind merging the two? --Codrin.B (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
You've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. SarahStierch (talk) 22:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 24-48 hour delayHi One reason I asked, is that it seems that the Costoboci, in this article at least, were living in what is now western Ukraine and south-eastern Poland. It would be normal for a mountain range to separate tribes and cultures, but I would like to spend a day or so to check with a couple of sources regarding tie-ins with the Cimmerians, Magna Germania, and the Sarmatians. If so, then perhaps User:Saukkomies (already a member of the Dacia group I believe), may be able to help with some aspects of the article, though unfortunately he is normally busy teaching at University - which impedes his on-Wiki time and, though it may be some time before he can get back to you with assistance, it is normally worth the wait :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 21:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
I found a source that talks a bit about the origins of the Costoboci that isn't included in the Wiki article. Here's the citation:
This is located in the journal: Etnolog Ljubljana: Etnografski muzej, 1927-1945 Leto 2 (1928), str. 92-94 ISSN: 0353-4855 It's written in French (which I don't read), but it appears to be a good source. Unfortunately, only two libraries own a copy of this, both of which are located in Slovenia, making Interlibrary Loan a bit impossible for me... --Saukkomies talk 16:35, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 28 January 2012 (UTC) WikiProject Military History introduction Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history. A few features that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 22:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 4 February 2012 (UTC) Ajutor 2 proiecteSalut, am primit de la tine mesajele WikiProject Dacia si WikiProject Romania. Ma bucur foarte mult ca te-ai gandit ca as putea sa fiu de ajutor. Iti scriu acest mesaj fiindca nu stiu cu ce sa incep, sunt doua proiecte. Eu sunt de mult pe wikipedia (2005) dar nu m-am implicat niciodata in proiecte sau administrare. De aceea te rog sa imi dai sugestii cu ce pot contribui la proiecte. Cel mai des editez harti, tabele, timeline-uri si corectez greselile pe care le observ, sau aduc idei cu totul noi in articolul respectiv. Multumesc. --TudorTulok (talk) 11:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Robot arhivareInca ceva, ma poti ajuta te rog sa setez un robot pentru arhivarea paginii mele de discutie.--TudorTulok (talk) 12:45, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 11 February 2012 (UTC) WikiProject Romania
--Codrin.B (talk) 15:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
You are welcome :) Although I am interested in both ancient Dacia and modern Romania (btw, Florin Curta is my favourite historian), I usually don't have enough spare time to participate in more than one wiki projects. Nevertheless, my contributions to related subjects will continue. Best regards.--Dipa1965 (talk) 08:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:31, 18 February 2012 (UTC) On Wikipedia, the general norm should be that everyone can edit any article, and so I think all protections should have an expiry date on them. For an article as high-profile as Romania, there will almost certainly be active editor watching it for vandalism, who will request protection again should the article be vandalised again shortly after the protection expires. Deryck C. 20:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Activitate suspectaNu pot sa-mi dau seama ce se intampla, dar omul asta are vreo 300 de edituri in 5 zile, mai ales legat de bucataria romaneasca. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Glavior — Preceding unsigned comment added by MerryXIV (talk • contribs) 13:54, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
infringementsHi CodrinB. In relation to the case you recently brought forth, I propose we sort out a smaller list of what should constitute the summary of the complaint. I propose we focus on the actual technical infringements and the cases of incivility - which would be the first section of your presentation. Best regards. Dapiks (talk) 01:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Dapiks (talk) 04:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject RomaniaBună! Mulțumesc pentru invitație, dar sunt foarte activ altundeva și nu prea am timp de proiectele enwiki. Spor la treabă.--Istvánka (talk) 07:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Buna! Mulțumesc si eu pentru invitație, sunt interesat pe tema asta dar eu scriu despre Romania mai ales in BG Wiki. --Uroboros (talk) 18:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC) Mersi pentru invitaţie dar nu am chiar atât de mult timp liber şi nu prea sunt activ pe wikipedia, se poate observa asta și din istoricul editărilor mele. Galaad2 (talk) 19:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC) Salutări,
Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited Hussar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Tyrida
A tag has been placed on Tyrida requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Oddbodz (talk) 10:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 21:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Oddbodz (talk) 21:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 16:32, 5 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Oddbodz (talk) 16:32, 5 March 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 6Hi. When you recently edited Tyrida, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pliny and Geto-Dacian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC) Bosut cultureDo you have some source that connects this culture with territory of present-day Romania? According to sources that I saw, all archaeological sites of the culture are in present-day Serbia. Therefore, the culture might qualify for Wiki project Dacia (due to opinion about origin of the people of that culture), but I do not see source that support connection with Wiki project Romania. PANONIAN 18:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
BacalbaşaThank you, I very much appreciate that. Concerning the lead: it is more or less proportional to the article, and I feel it summarizes the highlights of AB and his role in this and that (well, first in this, then in that). See WP:LEAD for that. The picture you mention is an embellished copy, probably very recent, of an image that seems to have first been drawn by C. Artachino (see front page here for one of the many copies). Judging by the nature and the style of the colored image you link to, I would say it is one from the series of didactic images that used to be put up in schools and other institutions during the Ceauşescu era. They are most likely the work of this guy, and as such are probably copyrighted. Interestingly, Artachino's own work is (still) copyrighted, given he died in '54, but, from what I gather (and this too has been debated by our esteemed wikipedia colleagues), stamps and images on stamps are not subject to copyright. Or rather,m the royalties are assumed to have been payed in full by the Romanian state. Of course, we know copyright strictness is mostly Potemkinian in Romania, but there you go - it's a bad law, but it's still the law. Regards, Dahn (talk) 18:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Please don't do thatPlease don't submit near identical AE reports just hours after the last one was closed. It was clear that the administrators there saw nothing actionable, despite the wall of text, so re-submitting it without substantial new evidence is very poor form. I assume you misinterpreted the previous admins' comments, which is why I am only advising you not to do it again—editors have been sanctioned in the past for very similar conduct, but I am giving you the benefit of the doubt. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:58, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Distribution of ethnic-Romanians
Hi Codrinb, just a note to tell you that I've copy-edited the above article. My attempt to contact the editor who was going to do this, but s/he didn't respond so I went ahead. I hope it's okay. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:55, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Bunä ziua !Am primit mesajul relativ la Scooter, pot fi de folos cu ceva ? Vei vedea pe discutia mea (si a lui) ca m-am sträduit sä-i arät lui Panonian cä "Republica popularä a Ucrainei occidentale" din 1918 nu a controlat Bucovina de nord pânä la frontiera sovieto-românä din 28 iunie 1918 cum a desenat-o el, dar n-am reusit, bäiatul pärând cäpos. Este vorba de harta West ukraine.png, figurând în nenumärate articole, la care am replicat cu harta TeilungenBuchenlands.jpg, care figureazä numai în articolul românesc despre Republica popularä a Ucrainei occidentale. El mai are multe härti "ciudate" (cu greseli privind diferite regiuni din spatiul ex-Iugoslav si ex-Sovietic, sau est-european pe scarä mai largä), si, fiind prolific, a împânzit Wikipedia cu ele. Noi avem un excelent cartograf, Andrein, care a si väzut aceste mesaje. Cu bine, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 18:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
De la HenrikuBună seara, abia acum am dat de mesajul d-tale. În ceea ce priveşte articole despre România: vorbesc româneşte, am petrecut ani de zile acolo, dar acum nu prea mai am timp pentru Wikipedie. Dacă pot să te ajut cu ceva, lasă-mi mesajul în pagina mea de utilizator în limba sorabă (hornjoserbsce), pe aceea o mai frecventez din când în când, încercând să pun la punct nişte informaţii cu privire la limbi romanice minoritare (istroromână, occitană, sardă...). Numai bine şi poate pe curând, --Henriku (talk) 22:17, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
greșeliSalut, vezi că ai câteva mici greșeli pe pagina ro:Utilizator:Codrinb: Mă găsiți mai de pe en.wp sau pe commons, contribuind [la] articole și imagini legate de România, Dacia, istorie și arheologie. Din când in când, încerc să contribui și pe ro.wp în limita timpului disponibi. În afară de aceste mici amănunte, te aștept să mai contribui și la ro.wp. (Terraflorin (talk) 07:08, 3 April 2012 (UTC)).
Hi, I'm trying to look at fixing this issue, but I'm not sure what you think is broken... This may be because there was a loading bug (rev 8028) which likely broke all loading of settings. In which case can you try a version from tools:~awb/snapshots/? Pick the one with the highest number after "rev". Testing it now, I can create a generic template and get it loaded back in fine, so I'm not sure if when I fixed the above I also fixed your issue, or I'm missing something. As far as I can remember, I never got round to implementing the addition of many extra workgroups for Generic templates.
Reedy (talk) 15:04, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
Message delivered by Dominic at 08:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.
Feel free to duplicate this invite on the pages of others who have commented, for or against. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:08, 20 April 2012 (UTC) Hi again, Codrinb, I'm about to start the copy-edit of the above article you requested at GOCE. Is there anything special I should take note of? There are lots of empty sections which I will delete; it looks like they're the reason the article is unnecessarily long. There's also some text marked as unreferenced, which I might delete if it seems to be irrelevant. Please feel free to revert, or preferably add content where it's needed. It's a looooong way from GA status at the moment! Thanks, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:41, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, it's one of the longest I've done in a while. I think the GOCE tag on the talk page is recommended but not compulsory, but I never bother these days and I've found that some editors, few thankfully, disapprove of my editing style. I was hoping the get all the January 2012 requests finished but the GOCE has discontinued the page for FAC requests and moved even older requests into the main queue! I'll get back to you on movable content; I can add invisible comments to the article if you wish. Anyway, I'll probably start Free Dacians tonight or tomorrow UK time, but RL is a bit busier (in a nice way) now. Thanks for the barnstar btw, it's appreciated. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 14:58, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Suggestions for improvementsHi again, and thanks for your comments; no worries. :-) Since I finished, a couple of IP editors have done a lot of work on the article and added two tables. I'm basing my suggestions on this version. Some parts of the article drift off-topic; these could possibly be moved to more relevant articles. The second paragraph of 'Origins' doesn't seem particularly relevant, although it's quite short and referenced. A lot of 'Geographical extent' talks about where Dacia was located rather than the language; possibly move to Dacia or Dacians. I've moved 'Fringe theories' up in the order, above 'The fate of Dacian', and moved the first paragraph of 'Fringe theories' to the 'Romanian' sub-section of 'Relationships to modern languages'; I hope that's okay. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Boston Wiknic
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Meetup/Boston at 19:53, 29 May 2012 (UTC). Salut, am creat acest proiect la ro.wiki pentru a unifica cele 7 proiecte de istorie, printre care și Dacia. Poate dorești să te înscrii sau/și să adaugi vreo propunere. Numai bine! (Terraflorin (talk) 16:20, 1 June 2012 (UTC)).
GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:
It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve. At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange). Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot. If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi t | c 17:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Referinte in introducereBuna Codrin, Am deschis azi o polemica referitoare la introducerea unui articol, mai precis articolul despre politicianul Mitt Romney. Polemica se afla la Talk:Mitt_Romney, mai precis in sectiunea "Inline Citations in Synopsis". Problema ridicata acolo e ca referintele lipsesc din introducere, iar articolul e mult prea stufos ca sa il citesc pentru a gasi referintele. In decursul polemicii, unul din editori prezinta un link catre WP:LEADCITE, pe care eu il interpretez ca permitand introduceri fara referinte doar in unele cazuri in care astfel de referinte nu au fost in prealabil cerute. Cum ar trebui abordata o astfel de problema? Consider ca persoana lui Mitt Romney e suficient de controversata incat o acoperire completa cu referinte sa poata fi ceruta cu succes de catre cititori. Daca observatia mea la adresa articolului are merit si creeaza un precedent in materie de interpretare, cum se poate transmite aceasta interpretare in documentatia oficiala? Intreb asta fiindca s-ar parea ca exprimarea actuala in WP:LEADCITE poate da nastere mai multor interpretari. Multumesc. BTW, am studiat si eu in Cluj din liceu incoace, si imi place mult orasul. Viridium (talk) 16:00, 29 July 2012 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Military history coordinator electionThe Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:49, 10 September 2012 (UTC) Steme RomâniaSalut. M-am înscris mai demult în WikiProject:Romania. Din cauză că multe sunt la rezoluție mică sau de calitate slabă, deși apar pe multe pagini, m-am apucat de vectorizat stemele județelor din România (dintre care am uploadat 8 acum). Aș avea niște întrebări, dat fiind faptul că nu prea mă descurc cu pățile organizatorice: 1. Există vreun sub-proiect dedicat heraldicii din România unde se discută chestii conexe? 2. Există vreo metodă de a populariza noile imagini vectoriale dincolo de tag-ul «vector available|fișier.ext» de pe pagina fișierului-sursă? Întreb pentru că sunt multe pagini care trimit spre stemele românești, însă eu nu prea am timp să editez pagini, dar totuși aș vrea să fac noile fișiere mai vizibile. Stemele uploadate recent: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/ArnoldPlaton Mersi de info, ArnoldPlaton (talk) 15:18, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard
The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here. Sites in Danubian provincesHi, Codrinb. I was wondering whether you could help me disambiguate two place names at Terra (mythology)#Prayers and rituals, as my knowledge of geography in Rome's Danubian provinces is poor. These are Ljubija and Rudnik in Moesia Superior. This isn't precisely your area of main interest, but I'd be grateful for any help. Cynwolfe (talk) 22:57, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 6Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thraco-Roman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rosalia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 6 October 2012 (UTC) Third opinionHi Codrinb. I looked into your request for a third opinion and decided that one was no longer needed. More than two editors are now involved in the Thraco-Roman discussions and the Daco-Roman dispute appears to be reaching a resolution. I would recommend using a WP:RFC or WP:DR if further dispute resolution steps are needed. Regards AIRcorn (talk) 06:11, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Disambiguation link notification for October 15Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Troglodytae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ister (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 15 October 2012 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Disambiguation link notification for November 4Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tartessos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assyrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC) Salutări și numai bine. Am început schița unui portal Dacia la ro.wiki şi mă gândeam că pe en.wiki trebuie să existe. Dar... surpriză... nu este! (Terraflorin (talk) 12:39, 10 November 2012 (UTC)).
The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Disambiguation link notification for December 4Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Basel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rheinau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 4 December 2012 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
Disambiguation link notification for January 12Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Maramureş, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Geto-Dacian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 12 January 2013 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Disambiguation link notification for February 10Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interlaken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kursaal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC) Romanian diacriticsIn terms of titles, yes. It isn't modifying article text, though, at least not yet. See, by the way, Talk:Bacău#Daily_Mail_reference. - Biruitorul Talk 14:34, 15 February 2013 (UTC) Hi Codrinb, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Codrinb, me again! I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Disambiguation link notification for March 12Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gümmenenkrieg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agnes of Austria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 12 March 2013 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. TalkbackMessage added 10:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Mootros (talk) 10:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. --Norden1990 (talk) 12:51, 3 April 2013 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
Hi Codrinb, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!
Zeugma, Turkey listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Zeugma, Turkey. Since you had some involvement with the Zeugma, Turkey redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). ColinFine (talk) 21:25, 19 June 2013 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership Newsletter Hi Codrinb! Thanks for participating in the World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership. Your contributions are important to improving Wikipedia! I wanted to share a few updates with you:
Keep up the great work, and please contact me if you need anything! Thank you for all you do for free knowledge! EdwardsBot (talk) 16:38, 30 June 2013 (UTC) Bridge.......sorry for reverting so quickly....., and although I would probably be able to read and understand enough Romanian at a pinch, I can not check the source as I would have to log in......but I suppose it is ok, and you are the expert, anyway.
Disambiguation link notification for July 8Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meteora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Theophanes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 8 July 2013 (UTC) 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General MeetingYou are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 10:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. HiI'm already a member. Thanks anyway. Octavix (talk) 22:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for August 11Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Republic of Pisa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Council of Elders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 11 August 2013 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
September 2013
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC) WikiProject Military history coordinator electionGreetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 18:33, 16 September 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 17Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maritime republics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pera and Tyrrhenian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 17 September 2013 (UTC) GA nominationsHi! I noticed your Maritime republics GA nomination via an article alert and then saw the article has unresolved maintenance tags. I thought to let you know that the criteria applied to review of GA nominations (see: WP:WIAGA) specifically instruct reviewers to fail such nominations without any further review. The situation is largely the same in case of Augusta Raurica and Republic of Pisa. There is no immediate urgency - GA nominations tend to await their review for few weeks - but it would be advisable to resolve those maintenance tags in place and possible other problems the articles might have in advance. Cheers.--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:01, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Augusta RauricaHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Augusta Raurica you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Augusta RauricaThe article Augusta Raurica you nominated as a good article has failed I feel bad about doing this. It's a nice article, but its content can't be checked or verified because it lacks footnotes. Cynwolfe (talk) 17:16, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Disambiguation link notification for September 24Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neacșu's letter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slavonic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 24 September 2013 (UTC) Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dacians you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Maritime republicsThe article Maritime republics you nominated as a good article has failed Request filled
The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. WikiCup 2014Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 01:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC) CFR Cluj
Dacians
TalkbackMessage added 13:34, 4 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. — Mr. V (t – c) 13:34, 4 November 2013 (UTC) Dacians complete
The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The article Dacians you nominated as a good article has passed It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Terraflorin (talk) 08:35, 29 November 2013 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Happy New Year Codrinb!
A barnstar for you!
The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Regarding Latin Europe & Romance-speaking EuropeHey Codrin, I would like for you to check this discussion regarding a possible merge of Latin Europe with Romance-speaking Europe. At first I was in favor, but now I'm unsure. Your thoughts would be appreciated. Afro-Eurasian (talk) 03:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 31Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Asociația Transilvană pentru Literatura Română și Cultura Poporului Român, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luceafărul (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC) January 2014
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for February 16Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ancient Macedonians, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Methone and Pausanias (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Disambiguation link notification for February 24Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ancient Macedonians, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Koinon and Axius (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC) List of Dacian namesSalut, am găsit recent câteva nume proprii dacice (vezi Cohors I Aelia Dacorum#Attested personnel) și aș fi vrut să le pun și în List of Dacian names dar n-am înțeles de ce unele cuvinte (ex. Dadas, Dadazi) nu sunt trecute în tabel. Apoi n-ar fi oare mai bine ca lista să fie sortată implicit alfabetic? -- Numai bine, Saturnian (talk) 15:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
InvitationHi! I'd like to invite you to take a look at this discussion: Talk:List_of_Romanian_words_of_possible_Dacian_origin#Recent_edits_by_Torvalu4. You made some contributions on this subject before, so maybe you are interested to involve in this debate too. User:Torvalu4 asserts that the words commonly considered to be part of the Eastern Romance substratum are in fact borrowed by Romanian from Albanian. 79.117.175.184 (talk) 10:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 19Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Potaissa (castra), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Napoca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Too many copy edit requests on the GOCE Requests page (new limit)As of March 16, the Guild of Copy Editors has implemented a new limit of two (2) copy edit requests at a time for any one editor on the Requests page. You recently posted a third request, for Avar Khaganate. Can you please remove it and wait until one of your other requests is done before posting a new one? Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience. (Also, please let me know if I am in error with this message.) – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 26Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 26 March 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
Ancient Macedonians
Disambiguation link notification for April 18Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicolae Dunca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cross Keys (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Disambiguation link notification for April 25Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Țara Moților, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vidra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 25 April 2014 (UTC) Carpathian Danubian space listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Carpathian Danubian space. Since you had some involvement with the Carpathian Danubian space redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 07:17, 12 May 2014 (UTC) Carpathian region listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Carpathian region. Since you had some involvement with the Carpathian region redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 07:17, 12 May 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
My possible contributionhi there! If anyone is interested in a good Romanian - English or vice versa translation, I would gladly help. Or a proofreading. Otherwise, all my materials are back in Romania so I am lost at editing chapter. But translations! Anytime! Cheers!Simona33 19:47, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
WP .ro articles that need taggingHi. What caused you to add Vinkovački Banovci and similar articles to Wikipedia:WikiProject Romania/Drafts/Articles that need tagging3? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 17Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Breadfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vaidei (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 17 June 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Imagine 1dec1918.jpgSalut, se vrea ștergerea imaginii 1dec1918.jpg preluată din Magazin Istoric. Revista fiind din perioada comunistă nu cred că are drept de autor dar nu sunt sigur. Ce părere ai? -- Numai bine, Saturnian (talk) 06:44, 22 June 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 4Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Origin of the Albanians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vladimir Georgiev. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 4 July 2014 (UTC) ProiectSalut,
Keesings accessHey Condrinb, please respond to the question on your access request at Wikipedia:Keesings, Sadads (talk) 12:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 11Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Origin of the Albanians, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Palanca and Satu Nou. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 11 July 2014 (UTC) You've got mail!Message added 13:39, 11 July 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:39, 11 July 2014 (UTC) CredoHello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Disambiguation link notification for August 27Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Knyaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 27 August 2014 (UTC) AvariaCaucasian Avaria has redirected to Avar Khanate since 2008. I just created Eurasian Avaria, redirecting to Avar Khaganate. Should Avaria be a disambiguation, as Avar is? Or maybe redirect to Avar? If not, how is it determined whether the Khaganate or the Khanate is the WP:primary topic? The only mention of the text string "avaria" in the Khagnate article is a link to modern-day Bavaria. If you change the redirect Avaria, then you should also move the hatnote from Eurasian Avars that says "Avaria" redirects here. For the genus of moths, see Avaria (genus). – Wbm1058 (talk) 14:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. WikiProject Military history coordinator electionGreetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 15Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Cyclades, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irini. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou! The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Disambiguation link notification for October 23Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Etruscan citiesI appreciate your effort on Etruscan cities but it is rather double work. The Etruscan city of Emporium (Italy)now links to Empoli. And the city Cassina for example, links to the modern city of Cascina. Both Empoli and Cascina were already linked... The Banner talk 21:53, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Romanians were nomads?Hi. What do you think about the inclusion of the article Origin of the Romanians into Category:Nomadic_groups_in_Eurasia? If you are against, please submit a comment at Talk:Origin_of_the_Romanians 84.197.146.185 (talk) 06:46, 25 November 2014 (UTC) Category:Romanian cinema task force articlesCategory:Romanian cinema task force articles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fortdj33 (talk) 16:52, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC) This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience. Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81 MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Language-population update projectHi. The 18th edition of Ethnologue just came out, and if we divide up our language articles among us, it won't take long to update them. I would appreciate it if you could help out, even if it's just a few articles (5,000 articles is a lot for just me), but I won't be insulted if you delete this request. A largely complete list of articles to be updated is at Category:Language articles citing Ethnologue 17. The priority articles are in Category:Language articles with old Ethnologue 17 speaker data. These are the 10% that have population figures at least 25 years old. Probably 90% of the time, Ethnologue has not changed their figures between the 17th and 18th editions, so all we need to do is change "e17" to "e18" in the reference (ref) field of the language info box. That will change the citation for the artcle to the current edition. Please put the data in the proper fields, or the info box will flag it as needing editorial review. The other relevant fields are "speakers" (the number of native speakers in all countries), "date" (the date of the reference or census that Ethnologue uses, not the date of Ethnologue!), and sometimes "speakers2". Our convention has been to enter e.g. "1990 census" when a census is used, as other data can be much older than the publication date. Sometimes a citation elsewhere in the article depends on the e17 entry, in which case you will need to change "name=e17" to "name=e18" in the reference tag (assuming the 18th edition still supports the cited claim). Remember, we want the *total* number of native speakers, which is often not the first figure given by Ethnologue. Sometimes the data is too incompatible to add together (e.g. a figure from the 1950s for one country, and a figure from 2006 for another), in which case it should be presented that way. That's one use for the "speakers2" field. If you're not sure, just ask, or skip that article. Data should not be displayed with more than two, or at most three, significant figures. Sometimes it should be rounded off to just one significant figure, e.g. when some of the component data used by Ethnologue has been approximated with one figure (200,000, 3 million, etc.) and the other data has greater precision. For example, a figure of 200,000 for one country and 4,230 for another is really just 200,000 in total, as the 4,230 is within the margin of rounding off in the 200,000. If you want to retain the spurious precision of the number in Ethnologue, you might want to use the {{sigfig}} template. (First parameter in this template is for the data, second is for the number of figures to round it off to.) Dates will often need to be a range of all the country data in the Ethnologue article. When entering the date range, I often ignore dates from countries that have only a few percent of the population, as often 10% or so of the population isn't even separately listed by Ethnologue and so is undated anyway. If Ethnologue does not provide a date for the bulk of the population, just enter "no date" in the date field. But if the population figure is undated, and hasn't changed between the 17th & 18th editions of Ethnologue, please leave the ref field set to "e17", and maybe add a comment to keep it so that other editors don't change it. In cases like this, the edition of Ethnologue that the data first appeared in may be our only indication of how old it is. We still cite the 14th edition in a couple dozen articles, so our readers can see that the data is getting old. The articles in the categories linked above are over 90% of the job. There are probably also articles that do not currently cite Ethnologue, but which we might want to update with the 18th edition. I'll need to generate another category to capture those, probably after most of the Ethnologue 17 citations are taken care of. Jump in at the WP:LANG talk page if you have any comments or concerns. Thanks for any help you can give! — kwami (talk) 02:45, 4 March 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. TWL HighBeam check-inHello Wikipedia Library Users, You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer. Thank you. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. TWL Questia check-inHello! You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer. Thanks! TWL Questia check-inHello! You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer. Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:43, 12 May 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Wikipedia Library needs you! We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help! With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. HelloI have seen you improved seasons or parts of articles in Cupa României and List of Cupa României finals. Would you like to help to improve other missing seasons? I already start with the first ones. Thank you!Alexiulian25 (talk) 02:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. WikiProject Military history coordinator electionGreetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC) RomaniaI see you are interested in improving about Romania. Do you have time to create / improve some seasons in Cupa României, there are many seasons missing. Help me at least with a few seasons. Thank you.Alexiulian25 (talk) 22:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
I do not know how to place a request on this pages, can you please place the request for me please? with Cupa României and Liga II of romanian football.--Alexiulian25 (talk) 14:26, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MAYou are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXV, October 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Article upgrade assistance request (Pre-translation stage)Seasons Greetings, This is in reference to a relatively new umbrella article on en-wikipedia named Ceremonial pole. Ceremonial pole is a human tradition since ancient times; either existed in past at some point of time, or still exists in some cultures across global continents from north to south & from east to west. Ceremonial poles are used to symbolize a variety of concepts in several different world cultures. Through article Ceremonial pole we intend to take encyclopedic note of cultural aspects and festive celebrations around Ceremonial pole as an umbrella article and want to have historical, mythological, anthropological aspects, reverence or worships wherever concerned as a small part. While Ceremonial poles have a long past and strong presence but usually less discussed subject. Even before we seek translation of this article in global languages, we need to have more encyclopedic information/input about Ceremonial poles from all global cultures and languages. And we seek your assistance in the same. Since other contributors to the article are insisting for reliable sources and Standard native english; If your contributions get deleted (for some reason like linguistics or may be your information is reliable but unfortunately dosent match expectations of other editors) , please do list the same on Talk:Ceremonial pole page so that other wikipedians may help improve by interlanguage collaborations, and/or some other language wikipedias may be interested in giving more importance to reliablity of information over other factors on their respective wikipedia. This particular request is being made to you since your user name is listed in Wikipedia:Translators available list. Thanking you with warm regards Mahitgar (talk) 06:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC) Season's GreetingsTo You and Yours! The Bugle: Issue CXVII, December 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXVIII, January 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Roman Dacia article ready for GA?Hi Codrinb, How are you? You may remember back in 2012 we spent a great deal of time trying to fix the Roman Dacia article. I've once again gone in and have revised the article to address the final few issues around dubious statements and unsourced assertions, particularly the Grumeza issue. I think its at a stage where it can be recommended to GA status. Could I ask you to have a look and see what you think? If you think it's up to scratch, would you be willing to nominate it? Thanks! Oatley2112 (talk) 12:03, 26 April 2016 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXII, May–June 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
Thanks! I was thinking of dividing the timeline by centuries, similar to the Timeline of Croatian history I've recently been working on. I feel it makes the TOC look cleaner and eliminates the need to make arbitrary decisions on where periods begin and end. I see you're one of the main contributors to the article; what do you think? Battle of MorgartenI've had a go at the the article [66] but it needs a couple of clarifications to help us finish it - could you follow the GOCE link and make a comment ? Thanks. Acabashi (talk) Augusta RauricaHiYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.) You're invited: Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March
You're invited!
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.) Edit-a-thon inviteYou're invited to the Peabody Essex Museum Edit-a-thon Spring 2014
 On May 3rd, the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, Massachusetts will be hosting a Native American and Chinese Art edit-a-thon from 9:00-5:00 pm. You are more than welcome to attend, as there will be free food and drink, and an outing afterwards. If you are interested, please sign up here, as we would love to see you there! If you have any questions, please leave a message at Ed Rodley's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list. Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial edit-a-thons
New England Wikimedians summer events!
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
![[2]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Teritoriul_onomastic_al_elementului_dava_-_Sorin_Olteanu.jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](http://www.kroraina.com/thrac_lang/THR_LANG.gif){kind=link}
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thraco-Illyr-Lang.png){kind=link}
