This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ckfasdf. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Thank you and sorry
Hello, I want to say a big thank you for your great work on reporting the page and also reverting their BS. I'm sorry for the fellow action that went into tantrum-producing state when they are in down side that might make you feel uncomfortable.
As an apologize, I want to give you a sweet cake! Hope you are still well within all of these LTA drama.
Remember that G5 does not permit tagging of articles that have substantial edits by others not subject to the ban or sanctions. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 11:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
@Pbritti: While it's true that G5 does not permit tagging of articles that have had substantial edits by others not subject to the ban or sanctions, my understanding of a 'substantial edit' is when other editors add new sourced content to the article itself. In this case, when we compare the state of the article since it was last edited by the sock and after the involvement of multiple editors, I do not see any substantial edits. The changes made so far seem to include removal of maintenance tags, fixing minor errors like references, paraphrasing sentences, switching "British" to "English", and adding categories—none of which amount to significant content contributions. Therefore, the sock remains the major contributor, and the article would still qualify for G5. Ckfasdf (talk) 12:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
