User talk:ChristopherCollinsII

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Miles Davis, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Miles Davis with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MaenK.A.Talk 16:53, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Chick Corea with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. MaenK.A.Talk 16:54, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fart Dragon

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Fart Dragon, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 17:31, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Fart Dragon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. andy (talk) 17:32, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. In your recent edit to my talk page you altered existing text that had nothing to do with you. One more edit of a vandalistic nature anywhere on Wikipedia and you will definitely be blocked.

Incidentally, I chose not to answer your previous question on my talk page because it sought to justify your vandalism. andy (talk) 22:35, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're the Coolest

Not Getting Banned by andy
You haven't done anything wrong, just being yourself, but Wikipedia has other Plans. Luckily, since its your own page, you can't get in trouble for what you put on it. Wikipedia trains good police officers {{SUBST:Christopher Collins}} 01:03, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 01:41, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ChristopherCollinsII (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why did you ban me? I didn't do a ton of things wrong, and I even congratulated Andy for his diligent work. What do I have to do to get another chance? {{SUBST:Christopher Collins}} 01:43, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You haven't been banned, you've been blocked - there's a difference. And looking at your edit history, the answer to "why" is pretty obvious. Creating inappropriate articles and refactoring talk page comments [1] are good reasons, and your obvious lack of comprehension as to how these are wrong adds up to no unblocking. Please read WP:V, WP:N, WP:RS, WP:NOT, WP:VAND and WP:GAB before appealing your block again. The Bushranger One ping only 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.