User talk:ChristinaNY

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Poppified was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Poppified talk 04:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, ChristinaNY! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Poppified talk 04:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Information icon

Hello ChristinaNY. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Maddox Gallery, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ChristinaNY. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ChristinaNY|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Poppified talk 04:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Poppified, I have been not paid and don't have any connection with Maddox. I was impressed with the Gallery after I recently visited it. When I searched for its wikipedia article, I couldn't find any which prompted to create one for it. Thank you ChristinaNY (talk) 06:35, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its fine if its the case. But your submission is never gonna pass in the present state as it have zero sources that gives enough coverage to the subject.Thanks--Poppified talk 06:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will try to add better sources. Thank you ChristinaNY (talk) 06:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, please ping me in your replies.You should also read WP:REFBOMB and avoid putting so many sources. The article can be accepted if it passes the basic criteria of WP:THREE.Thanks--Poppified talk 07:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Poppified, I have resubmitted the draft after making the desired changes. Please do review it again. Thank you. ChristinaNY (talk) 07:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done.Thanks--Poppified talk 11:27, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maddox Gallery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Poppified talk 11:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Maddox Gallery, is not suitable as written to remain published. Also, I am in agreement with JasonAQuest view on notability. The draft needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 04:12, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, ChristinaNY. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maddox Gallery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Alphaonekannan per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alphaonekannan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 11:55, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]