This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
This user is taking a wikibreak and would like to say the following things to the follow members
To everybody who's trust I had,I am truly sorry. Swarm, I don't care what you think of me now, but you were a great mentor and perhaps maybe even a friend. SudoGhost when you get back, thank you for taking me in when nobody else would. Thank you. Worm you supported my last unblock when nobody else did, on top of that you spent a lot of your time researching a user for me, thank you. To ArcAngel thanks for everything, I hope you make a great admin. To Demiurge thanks for taking my side at ANI. To Gwen Gale, you had every right to block me, please don't think I hate you, I respect you a lot. To Colofac we both had extremely different view points, but you're not blocked indef so good luck on editing. To Floquenbeam you're a nice admin, you didn't block me right away and if I was guilty, I would admit it if I was given the chance that you gave me. To Starship.paint you're a new user with a lot going for you, good luck, To Deely I'm sorry for bringing up your past record to use it against you. Here's the last thing I want to say: I am innocent, I always patrol AIV and always check all the reported user's talk pages. I put "THIS IS A SCHOOL IP" on the top and that's how I knew it was mine. I love you all and I will be back! Thank you everyone! --ChristianandJericho09:21, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi CandJ. Just a note that WWE Champion redirects to WWE Championship. So, if WWE Championship is already wikilinked in the first half of a sentence, then WWE Champion doesn't need wikilinking in the second half of the sentence. This is because WP:REPEATLINK says that we should, "in general, link only the first occurrence of an item".
This goes for all other situations too. For example, if a wrestler's name is already wikilinked once in an article, we don't need to wikilink it again later in the same article. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 15:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please explain how you were aware so quickly that your school IP had been reported to AIV. This is important; please do not edit anywhere else until you have answered this question. --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:35, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your school's IP address would not have shown up on your watchlist; it isn't in the edit summary. Would you like to be honest, or would you like me to block you indefinitely? --Floquenbeam (talk) 03:41, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Even if it is your school, you just happened to see your school's IP address at AIV? Which you have memorized? At age 13? Do you really expect us to believe that? Swarmu / t03:48, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I find it unlikely that he would have his "school's" current IP address (which evidently changes all the time) memorized. I have a harder time believing that he looked at AIV for no reason (without going there to report anyone) less than 1 minute after his IP was reported, when there is nothing in the edit summary that would have led him to think his IP had just been reported. C&J, last chance to tell the truth. --Floquenbeam (talk) 03:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, ChristianandJericho, I'm not as nice as Floquenbeam here and I've just blocked you indefinitely. You're obviously not mature enough to edit here without making useless excuses and wasting others' time. I don't think it's fair to treat children any differently than adults on Wikipedia because Wikipedia isn't designed for children—so if you want to edit this site again, it will be a few years in the future. /ƒETCHCOMMS/04:01, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Don't apologize. They were treated perfectly fair to the end, and the unblock was the right thing to do at the time. Swarmu / t05:36, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You have yet to explain how you would know it was your school's IP. Either way, while it is certainly possible that you are innocent here, the evidence is stacked highly against you and you know what they say about ducksNoformationTalk08:57, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)C&J, when an editor who is on his last chance (ie, you have a history), asks us to believe massive coincidences (you were in exactly the right place, that you looked at a random set of numbers and realised they matched a certain other random set of numbers and then wrote a reply - all in under a minute) - I'd be willing to take the risk that you are innocent. Editing wikipedia is not a right, you'd already had more chances than many think you deserve. WormTT· (talk) 09:06, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If it's true, I expect you're going to have to take your lumps. Leave wikipedia for a few months, don't sock and consider coming back under the WP:STANDARDOFFER. I don't have a better suggestion. WormTT· (talk) 09:13, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Stay away from Wikipedia an get over it. Playing the victim makes you look bad. You have a real life, so live it. Wikipedia is rarely healthy for children. /ƒETCHCOMMS/14:33, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rather than checking the page every day, I suggest you instead tick "E-mail me when my user talk page is changed" under "My Preferences". That way you will still be notified if there's anything happening, but you will not find yourself in perpetual re-living of the same situation. WormTT· (talk) 14:40, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, well it's time for you to actually leave as you have said you intend to do so the clock can start. Replying here isn't helping.--v/r - TP15:14, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. Saying that you want to check your talk page every day shows that you have some sort of problematic addiction or connection to Wikipedia and that unblocking you would not really be a good idea. IMO, the best solution is for you to grow older. /ƒETCHCOMMS/15:49, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
