User talk:Chris.Bristol

Welcome!

Hello, Chris.Bristol, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Compdude123 03:27, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Chris.Bristol (talk) 13:59, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Talk:Boeing 377, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. Compdude123 03:30, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

I know I've been bothering you a lot but I promise this will be the last time. I just wanted to let you know that your signature needs to have some sort of link to your user account page and/or talk page, per WP:SIGLINK. To do this click "My preferences" at the top right and in the area where it lets you choose a custom signature, make sure that it's formatted as wikitext, or you can leave the custom signature text field blank to use the default signature. Thanks, Compdude123 03:31, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I should mention why it's important to do this. It will allow people to easily access your user page as well as your talk page with links to both so that you can be contacted. This page is pretty much where others can send you a personal message. —Compdude123 03:37, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will do! Chris.Bristol (talk) 13:59, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dual Gauge in Australia

Please see Talk:Track gauge#Mixed Gauge Tabletop (talk) 12:31, 26 October 2013 (UTC) Why? I don't see what it's got to do with me. Chris.Bristol (talk) 17:46, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Great Western Mainline Electrification Progress (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
 The comment they left was:
This draft has no textual content and no references. A table without any commentary is not encyclopedic, and is not verifiable without references.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Chris.Bristol, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Great Western Mainline Electrification Progress (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joseph2302 was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at 21st-century modernisation of the Great Western Main Line instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is about a specific improvement, and so I believe it should be merge into the existing article. I see no need for a separate article which effectively just lists the progress of some ongoing rail works.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Joseph2302 (talk) 21:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Great Western Mainline Electrification Progress

Hello, Chris.Bristol. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Great Western Mainline Electrification Progress".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 17:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pyynikki Circuit

Hi Chris. Thanks for translating Pyynikki Circuit. I see that you added the note "Content in this edit is translated from the existing Dutch Wikipedia article at Pyynikki Circuit; see its history for attribution" to the end of the article. This should actually have gone in your edit summary so that it appears on the article's history page (see Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate). Could you make an edit to the article and use the note as your edit summary? You could use the edit to remove the note from the text of the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you'll need to change the wording slightly, to something like "Content from previous edits is translated...". Cordless Larry (talk) 07:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Airbus A321

Can you please have a read of the talk page guidelines and in particular the guidance on "Editing own comments" at Wikipedia:TALK#REPLIED. Thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 19:34, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]