|
User talk:CentralTime301/Archives/2019/November
Reverting Good EditsWhy are you erasing my edits saying that they are not constructive? so a convicted drug dealer that has done a lot of harm to a nation doesn't deserve to be described as a drugdealer in Wikipedia? why chapo guzman does have his profile as a drug lord? why tony hernandez can't be there? is JJ Rendon paying you? are you part of this drug organization? Please let us Hondurans express our reality. Hope this message is constructive to you Why are you reverting good edits?? Sorry if putting facts about a TV station is contrary to Wikipedia’s mission. Reply: You are disruptive editing KSPX-TV. Its actually redundant. CentralTime301 (talk) 17:23, 6 September 2019 (UTC) Your thread has been archived
KTTV edit warHi CentralTime301, while I believe you are correct in reverting Theteeveeman's edits, please keep in mind the three-revert rule. They have already been reported for edit warring and I suggest you stop reverting their edit until admins deal with the issue. Hintswen Talk | Contribs 19:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC) Signature violates WP:SIGLINKHi CentralTime301. Your Signature is in violation of WP:SIGLINK, please ensure you correct this ASAP. Hintswen Talk | Contribs 20:19, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Unexplained removal?Firstly, don't template the regulars. Also secondly, all of that is unsourced statements, original research, and trivia. This is a major issue in this realm of articles, and considering the removal of unsourced information to be disruptive is just disruptive in its own right. ViperSnake151 Talk 16:53, 21 September 2019 (UTC) Ways to improve KTLO-LPHello, CentralTime301, Thank you for creating KTLO-LP. I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Meatsgains(talk) 21:11, 21 September 2019 (UTC) LX (TV network) moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, LX (TV network), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " Viacom/CBS merger mentionsI've reverted these again; for all intents and purposes until a merger structure is announced and for film/TV-specific divisions, there's no need for the line at all and it just adds needless work and edits overall. Nickelodeon Digital and Movies have no reason to need mention involving the merger, nor does CBSSN, because they're away from the major divisions of the company. Nate • (chatter) 21:27, 1 October 2019 (UTC) Its because Viacom and CBS Corporation will merge, but what if Viacom will retain Nickelodeon Movies and Digital? Main CentralTime301 page and talk 21:41, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Your thread has been archived
KFXF-LDI have again re-reverted your edit; MyNet airs at 3am to a crowd of barely a hundred. Gray has no branding with MyNet on this station to speak of, and is clearly highlighting MeTV much more than they will a service that's airing at 3am. To edit here, you must have some common sense, and if you talked to the station's management, they would consider themselves a primary affiliate of MeTV. Further reversions of this will result in some kind of report. Nate • (chatter) 15:42, 11 October 2019 (UTC) Your thread has been archived
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 02:57, 12 October 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template. Disambiguation link notification for October 12Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KYTV (TV), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 12 October 2019 (UTC) Deletion of talk page commentsThere are very few circumstances where it is proper for you to delete the talk page comments of another editor. And you seem to have done just that, without any reason, let alone a proper reason. Please be careful. --2604:2000:E010:1100:7C05:FDF3:C711:D726 (talk) 19:27, 13 October 2019 (UTC) My apologies, I rollbacked it by accident. CentralTime301 (talk, contribs) 19:40, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Please, leave edits from this academic editor in placeI am a regular, long-experienced academic editor that has been working here for over a decade. The edits I have made today, over several hours, at the Kane medical history article have been careful, and extend edits done over the course of several weeks. Moreover, they are fully in keeping with all applicable WP policies and guidelines. Hence I am reverting your unexplained edits that destroyed many constructive, source-adding, source-verifying, and corrective edits. (By corrective I mean, edits made necessary by checking article text to appearing sources.) Please reply here with the issues you see, before reverting again. I have no intention for an edit war, and we can involve an admin if we must. But my editing is clearly not vandalism—review it carefully—and any bias against unlogged editing is disallowed by WP policy. Cheers. A former prof. 2601:246:C700:9B0:6D4C:597C:72AB:665E (talk) 21:19, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Your thread has been archived
October 2019
WBKB-TVRestored, as previous reversion was from an IP sock who is now on a six month block and presented no proof. Nate • (chatter) 21:11, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello!Hello CentralTime301! I removed a small bit of content from your user page, you didn't do anything "wrong", but we have certain guidelines that are mostly for your benefit. To learn more, please see this page that you may find helpful. I hope you are liking Wikipedia and will stick around and help out! Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 17:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
No testHello, you reverted my edits saying it might be a test but it was not. Could you tell me what i did wrong to be deleted? Thanks!" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.203.27.53 (talk) 19:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC) Your thread has been archived
W47CKPlease see the talk page for W47CK for rationale about why text is in the present tense. Thanks! Stereorock (talk) 11:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC) Jim RogersPlease see question by reverted COI IP at WP:TEA. (Wrong venue for the question; I’d consider replying at Talk:Jim Rogers and leaving a {{Moved discussion}} template.) Mathglot (talk) 10:09, 29 October 2019 (UTC) Your AfDsPlease stop nominating obviously notable stations which have past history and justify their articles. This is a waste of time and resources for those who have to defend nomination of these TV station articles; at worst, we are not going to delete an American television station article, ever, and unless it's completely promotional, it will be kept or redirect per past AfD outcomes. Nate • (chatter) 01:25, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Article taggingI noticed that tags you applied to Andy Gillion. Please see WP:OVERTAGGING. MB 04:33, 4 November 2019 (UTC) Requests for page-protectionComing back to my message from september 4th this year, again, please read our protection policy, and act accordingly. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 12:12, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
TalkpageGood afternoon, nope, my last edit was not a mistake. I am entitled to remove messages from my talk page. With all due respect, this is getting a bit tiresome. Especially since i came to you regarding the Sandro Mendes article and did not receive one single word in reply. Attentively --81.193.141.118 (talk) 15:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC) I guess this other message is overdue: maybe you were a little thrown off when you saw my pinging of you with an account instead of the IP. Yes I do have an account (this one, of course), but was reduced to IP editing due to vicious stalking. Now, it seems the stalker has either left WP or quit their approach (I have been feeling like it for some time now, just would not take any chances), so from now on i'll only edit with the account to avoid such pressure/misunderstandings from you (or any other editor) in the future. Attentively --Quite A Character (talk) 09:31, 6 November 2019 (UTC) Given your edit warring there with a bot, I've decided that File:Mario emblem.svg should be used. ミラP 00:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC) Please don't revert edits that were properly explained without giving a proper explanation. Drmies (talk) 17:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC) Non-free content use
Image tagging for File:S (Shrek) logo.pngThanks for uploading File:S (Shrek) logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. For more information on using images, see the following pages: Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC) November 2019Why are you quitting Wikipedia? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC) Mvcg66b3r, its because CentralTime301 is changing to a new account which is Spicyeater2005 (talk) 00:50, 13 November 2019 (UTC) Jigureasa (Strei)Hi, I wonder why you left a message on my talk page after I blanked and redirected Jigureasa (Strei). As I mentioned in the edit summary, this river is not notable. See WP:GEOLAND for more information. Markussep Talk 13:08, 14 November 2019 (UTC) Alternative accountCentralTime301, you created Spicyeater2005 (talk · contribs · count) on November 12 and declared it as an alternative account of your main account on the Spicyeater2005 userpage, although not on the CentralTime301 userpage. At the same time, you have stated that you are retiring your CentralTime301 account. Yet, you continue to edit with the CentralTime301 account and edit with the new account. Can you please explain what you are doing? The general rule is that editors are allowed only one account unless there is a legitimate purpose for creating a second account.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:57, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Inappropriate username warningPlease review the username policy before warning any other editors about their username. Your message to Apples&Manzanas was clearly inappropriate. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC) Your thread has been archived
Could you explain this?CentralTime301, could you explain this edit, please? --bonadea contributions talk 21:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC) I apologise if my question was unclear. I don't understand your edit so I asked for an explanation of why you made it. The IP added correct (and crucial!) information which you removed again. Why? (As I said on my talk page, please post here and not on my user talk page. Thanks!) --bonadea contributions talk 21:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC) November 2019The report you filed at WP:ANEW (see here) was an abuse of process. You provided no diffs and omitted several other fields as well, and your comment made it sound like you were reporting edit-warring from almost two years ago. If you disrupt noticeboards in the future, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:25, 14 November 2019 (UTC) A friendly piece of adviceHi - I expect that you've been directed to WP:DTTR before, but I'm giving it to you again, and suggesting that you read it. I see that you reverted your recent template on RHaworth's talk page, which is good, but seriously - you decided to give a blanking warning to an administrator when they set up a redirect? If you want to know why he did that, why not just ask him - it's pretty obvious he's not a random newb who doesn't know what he's doing. Please be more careful with warning templates - they're useful, but only up to a point. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 17:44, 17 November 2019 (UTC) ANI discussion
Please don'tRegarding your noted intention here, are you intending to notify all editors who have edits disallowed by the abuse filter? I can see many instances wherein that would not be a good idea. I also don't think you yet have the required competency in reviewing edits for you to discern when such a notice would be appropriate. Please consider other ways in which you can help improve this encyclopedia. -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:43, 18 November 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter message
QuranismHi CentralTime301, just wanted to say thanks for undoing the vandalism on the Quranism page yesterday. I keep adding beneficial information about Quranists in Algeria but some vandalist who has an agenda keeps deleting it! I will keep working to undo his nonsense! Quranism editHi User talk:CentralTime301, my edit was explained on the Quranism talk page and in a previous edit summary. This particular editor's account has been blocked indefinitely and his sockpuppet IP has blocked numerous times for making disruptive edits to the Quranism article. 2602:306:CC8F:65A0:FD7C:58D:B19E:4157 (talk) 12:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Trouted
Legal threat diff?Please provide the diff that led to this warning where you allege Spshu made a legal threat or other threat of off-wiki action, since I don't see where the user did anything of that nature. —C.Fred (talk) 20:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC) Quit with the templatesI think you should take some time and try your hardest to avoid using the templates available in Twinkle for a while. This edit reflects very badly on you, and veers into WP:ASPERSIONS territory. I would be very careful if I were in your position. -- a they/them | argue | contribs 00:09, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
November 2019
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)  Your recent editing history at WLNS-TV shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lebanon, TennesseeI think you may have been misled by the Wiki markup. After your change, the text said "a MeTV-affiliated television station serving Nashville, Tennessee, United States that is licensed to Lebanon", without any explanation of the fact that Lebanon is a town in Tennessee; the info is in the Wikilink but that was hidden to the readers by the link piping. (Suppose there were a town in California called Canada. If a Wikipedia article said "X is a television station serving Los Angeles, California, United States that is licenced to Canada", would it not be reasonabl for the article's readers to assume that the country was intended? This is the exact same situation. A small minority of the potential readers are aware of the existence of Lebanon, Tennessee, so the obvious assumption is that it is the country that is referred to.) This is an extremely minor point which I'm certainly not going to edit war over, but please take a moment to consider what the purpose is of removing information that makes an article easier to understand for the readers. --bonadea contributions talk 12:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC) SignatureHello, sorry to be a burden but your current signature violates the guidelines and policies as seen in WP:SIG. Unnecessarily long signatures with a lot of markup makes pages harder to edit and is generally is frowned upon by other edits. As such, I urge you to streamline it, and also read SIG. Thanks. HurricaneGeek2002 talk 16:11, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Welcoming new usersStop welcoming users who have made no edits, e.g., The one true overlord (talk · contribs · count).--Bbb23 (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC) Blocked means no asking questionsIf I am (currently) blocked, that means that I cannot ask a question at WP:TEA. Yes or no? CentralTime301 (Talk, Contributions) 15:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Bradv I cannot do the appeal or Beeblebrox (the admin who blocked me for a year) will deny it. CentralTime301 (Talk, Contributions) 01:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Bbb23 I still cannot try to do the block appeal or some admin will also deny it. CentralTime301 (Talk, Contributions) 13:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
But Stereorock I cannot make a new section on your talk page because of the one year block. No admin might unblock me or reduce the block length. CentralTime301 (Talk, Contributions) 21:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
The talking of making the new section on Stereorock's talk page is actually meaning the block I had, C.Fred. CentralTime301 (Talk, Contributions) 23:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
I was thinking about that but I realized I was blocked, so I can't do that or any pages in Wikipedia, except my talk page. And the "only edits" in the English Wikipedia are adding/or/editing edits in my talk page. CentralTime301 (Talk, Contributions) 23:40, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
What did I do to unfortunately have this block? Did I do anything wrong that resulted in the block? CentralTime301 (Talk, Contributions) 23:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
That will take a day or a week to review Wikipedia's policies. Beeblebrox, I will let you know when I read all of them. CentralTime301 (Talk, Contributions) 23:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC) Trouted
You have been trouted because of this! –Aνδρέας talk | contributions 22:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC) November 2019 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for a general unwillingness or inability to learn how to make useful, positive contributions to Wikipedia. I've been watching this talk page for some time now, and it seems nearly every day a new issue with your editing comes to light. Multiple users have tried to be guide you but it seems it hasn't really helped much. You don't even seem to have understood how to use your own talk page despite other users trying to explain it to you, and this is certainly not a complicated issue. You are making some good edits but the error rate is simply unacceptably high. As a self-identified younger user this block is done in the hope that in the year of this block you may mature some and be more able to follow Wikipedia policies and practices properly once it has expired. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC) |
_logo.png){kind=link}
_logo.png){kind=link}