User talk:Cdjp1/Archive 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Military ranks of Imperial Iran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marshall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Awra Amba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DW (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fard (rapper) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fard (rapper), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 16:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Air Training Corps crest.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Air Training Corps crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dhora Leka

Hello, Cdjp1,

Thank you for creating Dhora Leka.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Abishe (talk) 08:44, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Women's Royal Naval Service, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Director and Deputy Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Translating

Hi,wWhen translating from another language version of Wikipedia, as at Military prison in Schwedt, you must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary: Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at [[:de:Militärgefängnis Schwedt]]; see its history for attribution. You should also add the template {{Translated|de|Militärgefängnis Schwedt}} to the talk page. For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For scoring 907 points in the WikiProject Military history 2020 edit-a-thon March Madness, I am pleased to award you this token of appreciation from the Project. Thank you, and well done. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:36, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sarah D. Goode for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah D. Goode is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah D. Goode until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ✍ A.WagnerC (talk) 17:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week

Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) is being given away in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, including one week dedicated to the top half of Africa, though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. There's a potential £120 to be won in total for destubbing on any subject or region of your choice. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius 11:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hanns Leske moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hanns Leske, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 06:12, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fard (rapper)

Hello, Cdjp1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fard".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:15, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sammarinese election articles

Hello Cdjp. Could you provide a source for the information on the electoral system that you've recently added to the Sammarinese election articles? Thanks, Number 57 21:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57: I copied across what was present in the Italian articles. I have found citations for women's suffrage, and so have corrected and cited them. For the others after a cursory search I can't find anything in English language sources I have access to, but will do a deeper search, and start searching other language sources over the coming week. Cdjp1 14:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Defence Force Cadets - Ranks

Hey Mate, I hold the Master images of all ADFC Rank Images

Can supply to you to update the page im crappy at doing wiki edits let me know

HAWKEYEBASIL

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alfred Robens, Baron Robens of Woldingham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Durham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

British National Party‎

I am not sure your recent edit there was really a minor one.Slatersteven (talk) 16:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hong Kong Red Cross Youth League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chevron.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Academia de Suboficiales de la Guardia Civil moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Academia de Suboficiales de la Guardia Civil, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone 10:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"."

Please try to use a more useful edit summary than a mere dot. Edit summaries show up in watchlists and the page history, telling others why you made a change. A dot is completely undescriptive and unhelpful, as you can see in this very section header. If you're going to be making the same change a lot, it's not that much work to type the summary once and let your browser autocomplete it or copy-paste it each time. Thank you. Opencooper (talk) 22:13, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hanns Leske

Hello, Cdjp1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hanns Leske".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Academia de Oficiales de la Guardia Civil moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Academia de Oficiales de la Guardia Civil, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Expand Russian

These flags in the articles you are adding them are actually counterproductive. I do speak Russian, I have experience with the Russian Wikipedia, and I know that their source requirements are way below what we require. It is a lot of information there which is either unsourced or sourced to low-quality sources. And if it gets added here (and often with machine translation) I will be the one who has to deal with it. Please stop reverting my edits, at least until you are prepared to deal with the consequences - I mean, adding these pages to your watchlist, watch them every day, be prepared to figure out what sources are, copyedit machine translations etc.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: so you suggest I take the actions I have taken, and be prepared to deal with stuff that I planned to do? Got you. - Cdjp1 (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Are you capable of distinguishing between reliable and non-reliable Russian sources? Can you independently check information which only exists in Russian?--Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: well reliability would be determined by if the sources meet the standards for the English language wikipedia, as you yourself mentioned. Whilst my Russia is amaturish, checking foreign language sources and working with translation is something I am rather familiar with, and if in doubt it would be a case of erring on the side of rejection of additions. So with these considered... - Cdjp1 (talk) 00:13, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's ok then.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thank you for the barnstar. It was a much appreciated surprise. Finetooth (talk) 17:27, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for giving me my very first barnstar! If I knew how, I'd leave some virtual cookies here! Medievalfran (talk) 16:37, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Police ranks of Italy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Police ranks of Italy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 13:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Royal Marines Cadets logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Royal Marines Cadets logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hanns Leske has been accepted

Hanns Leske, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 12:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Police ranks of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jefferson County Sheriff's Office.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Primitive communism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agrarian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for You!

The Workers' Barnstar
This user has shown great editing skills in improving articles related to Communism or Socialism.
this WikiAward was given to Cdjp1 by Skjoldbro (talk) on 07:21, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • societies prior to their contact with European empires, such as those of Endre Sik. Would it not be better to have a society that has an article?
  • before the invasion of the Europeans. Is "invasion" the right word to use, doesn't this imply intend? I haven't seen this wording used on other articles related to the subject.
  • One paper has argued. Isn't this a bit vague? I mean, I like the point it is making, but doesn't there need to be some significance?
  • Margaret Mead, argue that private property exists in hunter-gatherer and other "primitive societies", but provides examples that Marx and subsequent theorists label as personal property and private property. I really don't understand this. It reads like critics and proponents have the same arguments.

Hope these notes are helpful, keep up the good work. Skjoldbro (talk) 07:21, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Skjoldbro: Thank you for the barnstar, I've been working on the edit to publish for around two months so it seems I made some mistakes and overlooked some parts before publishing it.

  • societies prior to their contact with European empires, such as those of Endre Sik. I used Endre Sík as the example as that was the person specifically referenced in the paper cited, turns out he does have an article, just the "i" in his surname has an accent instead of tittle.
  • before the invasion of the Europeans. I would choose to use invasion as after initial contact it was acknowledge by the contemporaneous parties that the Americas were inhabited by various societies and polities so the subsequent conquering and subjugation of those societies and peoples I believe fits the wording of "invasion". Though I have now adjusted it to say "colonisation" instead.
  • One paper has argued. This is from the already existing article, I've adjusted the wording and will look at doing more of a rework if I can access the paper and/or find other similar papers.
  • Margaret Mead, argue that private property exists in hunter-gatherer and other "primitive societies", but provides examples that Marx and subsequent theorists label as personal property and private property. My bad that final "and" should be a "not". I've now corrected it.

Military ranks

Hey mate, thank you for creating the Military ranks of the Royal Lao Armed Forces, great stuff! There are Navy ranks too which I will add when I can unless you get there first. Wondered if you were planning on any others? Bulgaria Kingdom and People's Republic + People's Republic of Kampuchea (Cambodia) would be grand if so. I can't make the icons unfortunately :(

Lankyant (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lankyant: Hi, yeah, all of them are on my list, it's just a case of when I get to them due to non-Wiki commitments, and other articles I'm also working on. Kampuchea was going to be my next target after finding the images, and I will get the Loa navy done, though currently only three images currently exist for the ranks on commons. --Cdjp1 (talk) 16:14, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canadian Coast Guard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superintendent.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Test

Hey, I have been thinking of how to "improve"/change the standard layout concerning point 1 of ranks since the last discussion, have a look at my test page. This allows for comparatives to countries with NATO code. I was thinking that we could change all the Non NATO Templates to this layout, that way we don't even have to change too much. Feel free to try things out or make changes. It might still need some tweaking. Skjoldbro (talk) 09:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC); edited 09:37, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Skjoldbro: Seems like a good plan. --Cdjp1 (talk) 10:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stratocracy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wiley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Army Clarification

G'day, I know this a bit late but as you assessed the Australian Army I just wanted some clarification on where, preferably, more citations can be added. Thanks for looking over the article. IronBattalion (talk) 07:16, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Argentine Naval Prefecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seaman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Military ranks of East Turkestan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Military ranks of East Turkestan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 15:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rank improvements

Hey, I have been thinking of making some minor changes to the rank templates, and wanted to run it by you, to get your thoughts.

  1. Removing the "National rank" category. There is only a limited number of nations which have it, making it redundant in 70-80% of the cases. Additionally, these ranks are generally classified as General/Flag officers.
  2. Removing "None/No equivalent". With the removal of the "National rank", there will be no need for the "none" in the officer category, as most have some kind of general officer. It also makes sense for the other ranks. Even in the NATO system, it should be fine with the removal, as I think it would be self-evident that an empty field in e.g. OR-6, would mean there is no rank within this rank code. I think that Comparative army enlisted ranks of Africa, shows that it is possible to have comparatives without any indicator of "missing" ranks.

Let me know what you think. Skjoldbro (talk) 11:54, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Skjoldbro: yeah that makes sense, no qualms from myself. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 08:33, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page views

Hi. Why are you using {{notice|{{Graph:PageViews|90}}|heading=Daily page views |center=y |image=Open data small color.png}} when we have {{Annual readership|expanded=true}}? --Renat 18:09, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RenatUK:, cause I didn't know we had that, and have just been using the same thing I've used for years. --Cdjp1 21:37, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In case you didn't know

Thanks for sorting out the date formats on Emergency medical personnel in the United Kingdom‎. Just in case you didn't know, you can force an article to automatically display in British dd-mm-yyyy format by putting these two templates at the top of the page (with adjusted dates of course for the date you place them) - {{Use British English|date=September 2021}} and {{Use dmy dates|date=September 2021}} 10mmsocket (talk) 17:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar!

Also it is great that someone noticed that article. Feel free to add improvements to it! 😁 Tewdar (talk) 18:42, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ISO 639-3

Do you know if there is a specific language code for "modern/late/1600-1800" Cornish? I think kw and cor are equivalent, and incorrect for this purpose? Tewdar (talk) 14:14, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tewdar: as far as I could find no, so I used the cor code to distinguish internally from revived modern Cornish. I know it's not really good ground to stand on, so if you feel it should be changed then I have no argument against it. --Cdjp1 (talk) 16:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, I thought it worked well. Somone else went around "updating" the iso codes, but I think your solution is very good. I think we should just put a note somewhere saying not to change if it happens again. I'll change it back to your version. Thanks for fixing the infobox on Vocabularium Cornicum by the way, looks much better! 😁 Tewdar (talk) 10:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Tewdar: added an invisible note to the section explaining the reasoning to it's use. --Cdjp1 (talk) 11:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Great, I saw it, thanks! Also, I should mention that I used "lang|kw" tags a lot in the "Vocabulary" section to mean 'Cornish of any period', whether old, middle, late, or revived. I think it would make sense to use oco = Old Cornish, cnx = Middle Cornish, cor = Late Cornish, and kw = Revived Cornish (and perhaps also linguistic reconstructions or Cornish of any period). What do you think? Tewdar (talk) 11:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Tewdar: yeah if we are talking of words from particular periods, we should use the codes to reflect this so the article is as accurate as possible, for the reconstructions I would suggest checking how such things are handled in other articles for guidance. --Cdjp1 (talk) 11:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the tags and the De Gruyter reference problem. I think on balance, for attested forms, oco = Old Cornish, cnx = Middle Cornish, cor = Late Cornish is best. Then, kw = Revived Cornish (all forms), with reconstructed Old, Middle and Late forms having the above codes but indicate that it is a reconstruction with the usual asterisk. Sound good to you? Tewdar (talk) 13:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pre-Marxist communism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socialist Appeal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Military ranks of East Turkestan (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TTP1233 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
If these insingia has been got some references kindly give it so that it could be beneficial for passing for article. And few are incomplete.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jyoti Roy (talk) 12:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Cdjp1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jyoti Roy (talk) 12:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Academia de Oficiales de la Guardia Civil

Information icon Hello, Cdjp1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Academia de Oficiales de la Guardia Civil, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flag request

Hi can you please create a flag of Pakistan armed forces which is showing in this picture[1] This is the logo of Pakistan armed forces which is showing in the center of flag.

And here[2] you can see low quality flag. Ytpks896 (talk) 08:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ytpks896: Here you go --Cdjp1 (talk) 11:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cdjp1: Thank you so much! I requested many users but no one listen to my request, i again thank you from my heart. Ytpks896 (talk) 13:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing

Please do not make edits without stating your reason why. Signed AtishT20 AtishT20 (talk) 16:05, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jamaica Police insignia

Can you please make and upload the rank insignia of the Jamaican Police? [1] Peter Ormond 💬 00:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Survey about History on Wikipedia

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 14:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Air Forces/OF/Second Spanish Republic (1931–1939)

Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Air Forces/OF/Second Spanish Republic (1931–1939) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Navies/OF/Second Spanish Republic (1931–1939)

Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Navies/OF/Second Spanish Republic (1931–1939) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays

Everlasting Fireworks looped
Everlasting Fireworks looped
 Bring on the cheer!

Hi Cdjp1, May you have a bright and beautiful holiday season.
Have a happy and healthy 2022!

Netherzone (talk) 17:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Netherzone (talk) 17:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iroquois

I didn’t look at all, but the words are from Morgan, and therefore Seneca. Unfortunately I guess this is obsolete orthography (I’m not an expert either). It would be nice if someone familiar with the Seneca language today could render them appropriately. In the meantime, this is the best we have. Peter Flass (talk) 01:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Religious communism. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 15:07, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Francesco Cesare Casula moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Francesco Cesare Casula, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 18:42, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page Views

Wondering what the purpose of putting page views on so many talk pages is? Is this a part of a new initiative?

18:53, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

@KaerbaqianRen: No, it's just something I've been doing for months, as I thought it would be useful to have the pageviews for articles. --Cdjp1 (talk) 20:16, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was wondering the same thing. I don't like it, it clutters the talk pages and is rather trivial too booth. Before doing this on a large scale, I think you should seek consensus that this is actually something desirable. --Randykitty (talk) 22:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Primitive communism

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Primitive communism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of List of communist ideologies

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article List of communist ideologies you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Primitive communism

The article Primitive communism you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Primitive communism for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 13:40, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of List of communist ideologies

The article List of communist ideologies you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:List of communist ideologies for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 13:40, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of List of communist ideologies

The article List of communist ideologies you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:List of communist ideologies for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Primitive communism

The article Primitive communism you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Primitive communism for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 00:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

supplement info for 2022 Ukraine war

hello sire, since i saw u are authorized to edit the page of 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, i just want to supply some source from Jordanian news about the deployment of Russian TOS-1 in south of Belgorod just today, hopefully can help ur edit updates of the article.

Russia is preparing the surprise of the war.. a video that monitors the arrival of the "destructive weapon" Al-Dustur news... 01:04 PM Sunday 2022

original title:روسيا تجهز مفاجأة الحرب.. فيديو يرصد وصول "السلاح المدمر"


cheers... Ahendra (talk) 12:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.gulfnews.com/amp/world/asia/pakistan/pakistan-iraq-agree-to-bolster-military-cooperation-1.77489837
  2. ^ https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/p/pk%5Ejs.gif

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

International sanctions during the Russo-Ukrainian War
added a link pointing to New Europe
Protests against the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
added a link pointing to Chaux

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars

Thank you very much! :) EkoGraf (talk) 01:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

re: A barnstar for your efforts

Thank you very much!!! :-) P1221 (talk) 07:44, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A well-deserved barnstar for you!

The Current Events Barnstar
In recognition of your countless contributions to articles related to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Benjamin112 ☎ 09:29, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!

It was very kind, and much appreciated, of you to have awarded me a star! Thank you! --EcheveriaJ (talk) 22:01, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thanks, but are you sure you've got the right person? Tony (talk) 23:44, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Tony1:, it's for your collective edits to the article United Nations response to the COVID-19 pandemic. I've been going through COVID related articles and giving stars to some of the most prevalent editors helping to expand, verify, and maintain the articles. --Cdjp1 (talk) 23:52, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you so much for this barnstar! Sami270 (talk) 14:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recording my thanks

My first barnstar! Thanks a lot! TheGoodIndian (talk) 11:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: A barnstar for your efforts

Thank you very much for the appreciation!. Best regards.--HCPUNXKID 10:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Started copy edit


Bear with me as it may take a few days to complete the whole article! Sushi725 (talk) 17:57, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thank you for doing this. Cdjp1 (talk) 19:39, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sushi725 (talk) 16:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Military ranks of East Turkestan

Information icon Hello, Cdjp1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Military ranks of East Turkestan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ranks and Insignia of NATO Air Forces/OR/Finland

Template:Ranks and Insignia of NATO Air Forces/OR/Finland has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Insignia of UK/CDT/WJAC

Template:Insignia of UK/CDT/WJAC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help submit a new article on Collaboration with Russia During Russo-Ukranian War

Hello, I am a new editor

Can I ask for your help editing and submitting this draft? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Collaboration_with_Russia_During_Russo-Ukranian_War


I believe timely publication can help nudge countries and companies away from collaborationism behaviour, hence the sense of urgency. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I0ving (talk • contribs) 14:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of communism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rank of UK/CDT/WJAC

Template:Rank of UK/CDT/WJAC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OF/Myanmar (BGF)

Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OF/Myanmar (BGF) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OR/Myanmar (BGF)

Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OR/Myanmar (BGF) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Garda rank insignia (1922)

Template:Garda rank insignia (1922) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmetic edits

Hello! I noticed that you made a cosmetic edit on the page Doukhobors. Per the bot policy, a cosmetic change is one that does not change the readable output of a page; your edit looked like so. While this policy applies only to bots, human editors should also follow this guidance. I would recommend avoiding making these types of changes in the future. Cheers! 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 02:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Market socialism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palgrave.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ainu languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imperial University.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Francesco Cesare Casula

Information icon Hello, Cdjp1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Francesco Cesare Casula, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rank of UK/CDT/ADCC

Template:Rank of UK/CDT/ADCC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aratta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Century Publishing.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Insignia of UK/CDT/ADCC

Template:Insignia of UK/CDT/ADCC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Francesco Cesare Casula

Hello, Cdjp1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Francesco Cesare Casula".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rape during the Bosnian War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Praeger.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:36, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Socialism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wiley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Socialism

FYI: Four additional errors appeared after your edit to Socialism. "harvp error: multiple targets" The other two are cite journal that don't have the journal name. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 05:32, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assam Rifles

What are your sources for the Assam Rifles badges ([2][3]) you uploaded? The Doom Patrol (talk) 18:25, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you now going to argue the citation YOU pointed to, which I then actually found and provided, is wrong? Cdjp1 (talk) 18:27, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If it is wrong, remove it. If you have better, add it. If the citations are ok, they can be left. Cdjp1 (talk) 18:38, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nice strawman argument. When did I provided any citation for "verifying your pictures"? My source was to verify the "rank names" which I updated, not your pictures. I asked you about the source for the "pictures of badges" you uploaded in SEPTEMBER 2021. The question remains, what is your source? The Doom Patrol (talk) 17:36, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies, I thought you were talking about the rank titles. The badges are extracted from images such as this one, which are prevalent on search results, and seems to relate to an everyday working uniform. Cdjp1 (talk) 18:06, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Removal has been reverted, stating source, image descriptions updated. Though looking at this the NonCom ranks look to be on a red backing, though they also seem to be in full parade dress, so those images may need updating, depending on what else can be found. Cdjp1 (talk) 18:14, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Those were nice edits yesterday at the 2022 Russian invasion article. The article is currently about to go over 400Kb which seems to require a bulking down of the article which is becoming too large and sprawling. My direction of thought in to take the Prelude section and either split it into a new article, or to rely on the existing links and summarize that entire section into 3-4 summary paragraphs. Any thoughts on this from your experience with the article? ErnestKrause (talk) 16:01, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Air pollution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fortune.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: A barnstar for your efforts

Thank you very much for the barnstar, it's the first one I get on Wikipedia in English and I didn't expect it ... :-) A greeting. --LukeWiller (talk) 19:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Soil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chemistry (journal).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your tireless work at Land. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 09:13, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antihero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blackwell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Territorial Army (India)

Can you add badges for Territorial Army (India) ranks? 117.230.85.133 (talk) 14:38, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you increase the width of officer rank template? It looks congested.--117.230.87.26 (talk) 14:51, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

small things

  1. Google books. Generally my ETVP script adds | via = xxxx wherever it makes sense. Because google books is so commonplace for URLs in book citations, I don't see any need for | via = if the URL points to google books. But I won't remove it if it is already present.
  2. The point of ETVP is to make the wikitext easy to read (visually parse); normally this means a blank following list markup, but not for citations within biblio listings. Doing this helps to delimit the beginning and end of each template.
  3. Normally in ETVP, there is always a blank before a pipe. ETVP is a trade-off between white space for clarity and trying to keep the cite as short as possible, so I made a small exception for the first pipe after the template name, with the exception of cite journal. It's possible I might remove this exception, since it saves so little space.

Which reminds me – I really must get round to documenting ETVP properly so I don't have to type out explanations like this!

--NSH001 (talk) 13:24, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]