User talk:Caterpillar84

Hello, Wikipedia friends. Please be advised that I find templates aggressive and disrespectful. If you'd like to collaborate to improve a page, please engage in a conversation with overt kindness and consideration. Citations missing or inadequate? Help me on the hunt for them rather than propose a total deletion of an article! Other issues? Let's digital high-five and get to work on 'em. I love contributing to the passage of knowledge here and would like to keep the experience uplifting and positive for all parties. Thanks so much and keep rockin'! --Caterpillar84 (talk) 16:09, 22 November 2019 (UTC) p.s. Please familiarize yourself with POLITE, ENGAGED, and WELCOMING etiquette toward relatively new users such as myself. This is all about offering mutual dignity and a group effort toward the addition of knowledge, not a subtraction of it. The wiki ethos is unequivocally all about the spirit of teamwork: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers[reply]

Miriam Yeung (activist)

Dear @Caterpillar84: Have you seen this: [1]. All you need to go, is you plug in a good google book ref, and it generate full harvard style reference for you. Hope that helps. scope_creepTalk 09:26, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Caterpillar84:, cracking article though and beautifully written.; Have you thought maybe expanding it out, to GA. scope_creepTalk 09:28, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Creep Scope. Nice to meet you. Thank you for that tool; I had never seen it before. I'll try to make use of it. Thank you! And I'm glad you enjoyed the page. --Caterpillar84 (talk) 22:07, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

googlebooks metadata

The metadata at googlebooks is notoriously flawed. With this edit, you added a {{cite book}} template that names a single author (Furia) three times in three different ways. I presume that you used Reftag for Google Books to create that citation. That tool is also flawed. Note that for the legitimate second author it added the parameter |coauthors=Michael L. Lasser which parameter has not been supported by the cs1|2 templates for many years. Do not trust tools. They are not perfect. Please check each and every edit that you make using tools so that others don't have to follow you around cleaning up the mess.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 11:54, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tori Amos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Woolford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nev March

Information icon Hello, Caterpillar84. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nev March, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Arise Africa

Information icon Hello, Caterpillar84. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arise Africa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nev March

Hello, Caterpillar84. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nev March".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]