User talk:Carwil/Archive 2017

ART+FEMINISM Edit-a-thon

Hi Carwil,

I hope you can drop by Special Collections sometime tomorrow (3/14/17) for our edit-a-thon with 2 guest speakers. CatonMA2 (talk) 20:02, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Executive Order 13792

Thanks for expanding this article. Just FYI, there are (I think) redirects for all of Trump's executive orders, so feel free to expand others, if interested. Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

your point on the Espionage Act was an excellent one, and new to me.

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 07:16, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tecumseh

Hi Carwil, I wonder if you could take a look at the latest edits by user:Display name 99 in the article Tecumseh, which have improvidently restored a lenghty quotation you had previously dropped. I don't feel able to do the job myself because of my pour English. Thanks --Jeanambr (talk) 22:37, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I whish to inform you that Display name 99 has restored again twice the quotation. Cheers.--Jeanambr (talk) 22:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would love you to take a look at this article

Hi, would appreciate your feedback on Native Art Department International, which was slated for deletion by a culturally inexperienced editor. Please put your thoughts here. thank you--A21sauce (talk) 11:30, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brock Turner

Your point was well taken. I was responding both the the garbled text, as well as the Glamour magazine citation provided that didn't have anything to do with the reference to legislation that immediately preceded the citation itself. Thanks! (I also added the citation for Brown's signing the bills.) Activist (talk) 10:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I also had changed some editor's single substitution of the name of the victim as "Jane," for the proper name "Emily," which latter was used throughout the case. Activist (talk) 10:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For you

You may be interested in phab:T101056. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 17:47, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Carwil.

I noticed you've done some constructive editing recently.
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 09:08, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Carwil. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mayor of Sucre, Bolivia

Hi I’ve just looked at your recent new article Mayor of Sucre, Bolivia. It seems to repeat material already contained in the main article Sucre. Are you planning to do something else with it? Thanks Mccapra (talk) 23:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I’m going to propose this for deletion now.Mccapra (talk) 12:44, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, Mccapra, don't you have other parts of your life? (I do, including two kids.) 72 hours notice is ridiculous.
Mayor of Sucre should have a longer list, and more narrative. Sucre, the city, shouldn't host this kind of historical list. And there should be some place for Municipal Council of Sucre, Bolivia to show previous iterations of the council. I'll add those in time.--Carwil (talk) 12:50, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ok thanks, I’ll take the template off.Mccapra (talk) 12:54, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]