|
User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/9Hi Can't sleep, clown will eat me, as a vandal-fighter I thought you might be interested in seeing this discussion. Regards, Accurizer 22:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC) CheersWill take him offa my friends list now, the cheating bastard. Glad I voted for you for ArbCom now. Vizjim 08:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Thank youBig thanks for the barnstar. Always a pleasure to revert vandals, that is when you haven't already beaten me to the punch. Usually you have. Prolog 16:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Continued vandalism by 148.65.194.201Since you gave the user with IP 148.65.194.201 a temporary ban recently, I thought you may be inclined to renew the ban given his or her continued pattern of vandalism. I just gave test4, but as you can see, the user was not warned for most of the infractions. Thanks, Dan Slotman 22:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Request for CommentAs an editor of the article "Jhonen Vasquez", you are invited to a Request for Comment (as suggested by Admin Luna Santin). Please see: Talk:Jhonen Vasquez#Request for Comment: Book format. -- Tenebrae 04:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Many thanks for the barnstar!Questionable edits to Kurt Cobain articleThis editor's edits are somewhat questionable. He previously attempted to prod all the chaos magicians. Now he keeps adding the category of chaos magician to Kurt Cobain even though nothing is mentioned in the article about it. He has also personally attacked me and appears to think he knows who I am, attempting to expose (someone's) name. He is the series of IPs he has recently edited. See the talk pages for warnings given. He switched IPs to avoid 3RR. I'm not even sure how to report a roving violation.
—Hanuman Das 14:22, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Anon-only block enabledWhen you blocked 65.19.91.99 you must have forgotten to check the Anom only box because I was blocked as well and had to be unblocked by another Admin. Just a headsup.--St.daniel 18:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Soviet Union and Islamic FundamentalismThanks. KazakhPol 19:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC) User talk:Vuong Ngan HaCould you look into unblocking this one? Also, the accounts he's logging in as appear to be proxies for the whole country of vietnam - maybe they could be indef bcked AO or not AB. Part Deux 02:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
User page problemCan't Sleep, I have a problem with a specific user page. I was reffered to you by Persian Poet Gal. The user:patrick hyde page has mentioned specific names and personally attacked them. Would you be able to either warn, block, or delete the page? Andrew Winston 02:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Unblock listG'day Can't Sleep, A user called Sandra Brown has sent a message to the unblock list. She claimed that you were the blocking admin. Capitalistroadster 07:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Could you now consider removing the "cite sources" note on the above page - I've cited the obituary page and included a link. ThanksThank you for the barnstar :-) Although I am curious what precisely were my contributions you gave the barnstar for... Reverting vandalism or main article edits..? Or both? --BorgQueen 00:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank from Vuong Ngan HaI tried as you adviced and through Special:Userlogin there it is seeming no any problem with editing in Wikipedia, but there also a little inconvenience, because I always have to reply/confirm to the message box of "Security information". Anyway, it is better than always get message showing that user is blocked. Vuong Ngan Ha 03:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Hi, You have put yourself as interested in helping out atWikiProject on user warnings. We are now at a stage where we are creating the new templates and are wondering if you are still interested? If so please visit the overview page and choose a warning type you wish to work on. There is a base template available here, which you can copy and use to get you started. Have a look through the redirects and see what old templates are affected and incorporate them into the the new system. Anyway, any questions please don't hesitate to give me a shout. Regards Khukri (talk . contribs) 08:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Template:IPAThis is not a high risk template. It does not appear on article pages, and should never be transcluded.
Thanks man, this website is pretty complicated, I am still learning and I am sure I will be learning for a long time :) Repeated vandalHi CSCWEM. It seems a vandal I've warned with a test4 thinks that because he uses a shared IP that he's immune from blocking ([1]), which worries me somewhat. Cheers, ----Dweller 14:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC) James Blunt fansite removalHi there - noticed that you had done a clean-up of the excessive number of fansite links on this article. Unfortunately, it appears you've taken off a few that weren't really fansites, such as Blunt's official website, and the IMDB link; as well as a single fansite which had been allowed to remain pursuant to some fairly extensive discussion on the talk page (it is a fact site that complements the Wikipedia article without driving it into pointless detail). If you have no problems, I will re-add those three sites later today when I am back at my home computer; however, if you have concerns, please let me know. I have no desire to step on anyone's toes. Thanks. Risker 19:43, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank youHappy Holidays and very, very many thank yous for catching the vandalism to the Hughes article. I understand that you were doing routine vandal patrol. Still, thank you so very much.TonyCrew 00:22, 20 December 2006 (UTC) BloodsYa beat me to it, I was just about to remove that material as well. Did not sound convincing one bit, and the fact that it was added by someone with "Knowledge" in their username makes it extremely suspicious/obvious. Search4Lancer 07:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC) LyricsSorry for adding lyrics thank you for warning me. cristy 12:54, 20 December 2006 (UTC) JupiterHello, Can't sleep, clown will eat me! Thank you for reverting those edits on Jupiter. I was going to do it but then you did it. Besides why would someone vandalize a page like that? Kamope 13:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Nice userpage! Your monobook.jsHello, Can't sleep! I was wondering what does your monobbok code do? No offence intended, but I hate trying to read the script and find it easier to just ask. Also, if I have your permission and I if I wish to use it, may I "borrow" the code? Thanks and since I can't remember your talk page rules, coul you respondd on my talk page? Thanks a bunch! Post scriptum: can youplease sign my Autograph book? Thanks for that too! —¡Randfan!Sign here? 17:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC) HelloLast night you send me a note to join Wikipedia. I'm afraid that I can't join to the English Wikipedia, because I'm not sure about my English level (I am a member in the Hebrew Wikipedia. click here to see my user page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.130.179.145 (talk • contribs) 08:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Smile Patelco has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! You deserve this
Tony Yayo vandalismThat page doesn't look protected to me, I still see random vandalism from IPs. Georgia Peachez 22:41, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
For always beating me to the reverts!
KangaroooWhy are you doing this? You deleted my page and picture... I have permision to use that picture... So dont try to tell me that im doing something illegal/bad! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kangarooo (talk • contribs) 14:08, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Thanks for spotting and reverting that vandalism on my userpage - in fact, just thanks for anti-vandalising! Good work :D. Ck lostsword|queta!|Suggestions? 16:22, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Merry ChristmasJust to let you know you are doing a GREAT JOB blocking vandalze. Thanks a lot. Merry christmas.--§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ 00:33, 23 December 2006 (UTC) §Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba 03:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC) Request for reblockWhile I like to assume good faith regarding my fellow students, I find the vandalism coming from this IP after your good faith unblock a violation of your trust. Please reblock. FYI, it has been discovered that the IP is for the entire school district. Typer525 Talk 07:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Even on wikibreakEven on wikibreak, you are faster than me with the reverts and blocks. Clown, I salute you! -- Samir धर्म 09:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC) You are one of the great assets of wikipediaI am just wondering how this clown operates on removing vandalism contents. Do you also have Bot to find out vandalism? Any way this clown is one of the greatest assets to wikipedia. How this clown is able to work 24 hours a day? --Indianstar 13:14, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Non-Latin username blocksThere is some dispute as to whether these blocks are supported. There are many active editors who do just fine contributing with non-latin names. Per the discussion here, there seems be support for reccomending for to people creating a username at en.WP to not use non-latin characters. But does not appear to be consensus for blocking people on sight who already have a non-latin account at another Wikimedia wiki. Will you please start taking these non-latin username through Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names in order to better gather opions on the mattter? Thank you for your attention to this matter.--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 17:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
There is not a paticular case, it is rather that people do not agree on how the policy is interpereted. There are claims the non-latin usernames are not be automatically blocked and therefore no reason to change the policy [2]. I thought if RfC's were used it would shed light on how people are interepreting the policy. Then we might be able to hammer something out. Right now there is not even agreement on what has happened with non-latin name in the past. Since there are several active non-latin editors it does not appear there was a widespread community effort to rid en.WP of non-latin usernames. I am told the policy does not need changing since there were only a trivial number of blocks. This is why I left messages for the admins who invovled in blocking non-latin names. If non-latin usernames are no longer blocked for whatever reason I would be happy. But I thought if anyone still wanted to make these blocks taking it through RfC could clarify the issue. I have been disscusing the issue at the talk page, and there has also been disscusion on mailing lists. BTW that is the third time for that removal, I wouldn't count on it sticking--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 19:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Merry Winterval(s)!!!!
— I was planning to hand these out on the 22nd of Dec. but things got in the way.... Happy holidays! —¡Randfan!Sign here? 20:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Courteousy noteCourteousy note Your name is brought up here: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GabrielF/ConspiracyNoticeboard (2nd mfd), as your comments to User:XP (who has since left the project) have been brought up. User:Tyrenius, who is also discussed in the same section, has already commented: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GabrielF/ConspiracyNoticeboard (2nd mfd)#Second separation Best wishes, Travb (talk) 23:32, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Awesome Talk Page!!!Your talk page is by far the nicest talk page I have seen in Wikipedia! How did you get the design for your talk page? Kamope 17:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Extremely sexy 22:59, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
AwwwwwwwwI'm sorry that you didn't get the arbcom job. Well. You had my support. And you will next time as well if you ever run again. You are my favorite Wikipedians. --Woohookitty(meow) 11:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
My Request for Adminship Thanks for your support on my successful Request for Adminship (final result 78 Support /0 Oppose / 1 Neutral) I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months. I am humbled by your kind support and would certainly welcome any feedback on my actions. Please do not hesitate to contact me. Once again, many thanks and happy new year! All the best, Asteriontalk 16:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC) Aoife MulhollandI created this Aoife Mulholland page, and then was told it was previously deleted, with you as closing admin. At the time she was a losing contestent. She is now the lead in London's Chicago, making her a quite notable actress. Should this go to deletion review, can we boldly revert the old page with out review, or shall we just build the page from here? Obina 18:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism on Old King ColePlease take a look at the image that User:Mr Goff persists in adding to the Old King Cole article. Thanks. --Macrakis 23:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Raiden ProjectIs there any reason you keep deleteing all the hard work i put into Raiden Project? I finally found out how to add stuff to it and your deleteing it -.- Im just putting in missing data and tips and tricks. get me back soon Slim ShadySlimSha8dySlim Shady
My User PageThanks for reverting my page bro. Cheers! xCentaur | talk 10:34, 30 December 2006 (UTC) Hi, Thanks DoDoBirds 12:54, 30 December 2006 (UTC) Khalil Kalfat on deletion reviewAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Khalil Kalfat. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. I originally voted delete, but the original article author came back, insulted us all, and provided some sources. Thanks! cab 07:02, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Love the NameJust wanted to say that I totally dig your username. That is one of my favorite parts of that episode. *rocks back and forth* "...can't sleep....clown'll eat me".-SVRTVDude 08:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC) FemslashHey, I assume your reversion was accidental? — Deckiller 09:47, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Where to report vandals?I didn't want to be overly bold, because I'm no expert on Digimon / Pokemon topics, but this editor appears to be making minor (subtle) but spurious changes: Chronoknight. Can you look into him, and maybe drop me a message with how to handle this in the future? --Snicker|¥°€| 17:47, 31 December 2006 (UTC) NameIs your name a reference to The Simpsons? John Reaves 00:46, 2 January 2007 (UTC) Vandalism to Hook and lateral playFigured since you got the power to warn users and such, 70.130.155.61 was hitting up the Hook and lateral play (American football) page a bit with some vandalization. Me and a couple of other users have reverted it's stuff, and looking though the history portion of the page, he hit more than once. I figured, as mentioned, that I would pass the word down to you, or at least other admins (your the only one I have contacted so far), so you can be able to handle the user with that IP. Thanks :) Whammies Were Here (PYLrulz) 10:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
SAFCDo something about the page Sunderland A.F.C: it has been flooded with a mixture of vandalism and good edits today, and I've had to revert it about 15 revisions backwards, to deal with all of it. But I've lost some good edits as well. The page is always vandalised though, but never at this speed.--Rasillon 15:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba 20:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC) Block mistake?Hi, you indef blocked an IP [3]. Mistake? CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 09:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Why are you reverting edits to Memon page ? Please provide a valid argument. Siddiqui 12:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Siddiqui 13:11, 3 January 2007 (UTC) Disco79Based on what User:Disco79 has been doing with his talk page since you blocked him, I wonder should the block be made indefinite? Grandad 17:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Possible future request for deletionThe article Ooze is proposed for deletion. If its proposal is accepted may you please delete it? If the proposal is accepted, delete on January 8, 2007 and don't forget to sign its deletion page. Kamope 21:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
New pages by user:WebmailnetCould you do me a massive favour and look into the edits of the above user? He's created some new pages recently and its almost like he's trying to harbour muslim beliefs, I've had one article speedied already (Kuwait kerala islahi centre ) but could you give your opinion please on the other articles? Thanks a million RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or lets have banter 23:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC) Dude!I put in my edit history over at AFI (as well as on the talk page) that I was hoping for a bit of time to cite the information before someone reverted the 'early years' section. I wonder; is there a template appropriate to the situation that I could use to ward off reversions until I get the time to cite the information? - Enzo Dragon 04:04, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Ten minute breaksHi CSCWEM, again I find myself asking you to place block notices on user talk pages after you have blocked them. I just ran across User talk:62.253.219.178. To quote WP:BLOCK "Users should be notified of blocks on their talk pages. That way, other editors will be aware that the user is blocked, and will not expect responses to talk page comments.". Thanks, Gwernol 13:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Block request159.191.12.27 (talk · contribs) can you block the vandal please? --HIZKIAH (User • Talk) 19:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Suspicious editsHello Can't sleep, clown will eat me, I was recently scrolling recent changes and noticed the odd contributions of User:Zarert. Somehow a user who admits to being sockpuppet looks suspicious, especially when their first edits are already vandalism if you see the article history of Denmark. Could you take a look at it please? Thank you.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 01:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
SerlmanoNot sure if this should be reported, or brought up in a cabal case or what. User:Serlmano's past contributions have been all disruptive, including abusive doctoring of comments and minor vandalism. Should this be handled somehow? -WarthogDemon 05:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello Pikminlover Meep!↑ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! A fan of unusual unitsI see you're a fan of unusual units. Did you know you can use Unix timestamps if you put an @ symbol before them? I tried it and was amazed at some of the interesting (and probably useless) features that the block function supports. Have a nice day anyway :-) --Deskana (For Great Justice!) 20:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
TeletubbiesSomeone altered the "teletubbies.jpg" image and switched it for a pic of Osama and his buddy Bert. Someone removed the vandalised pic and you replaced it? Is this a "new look" for the tubbies that I haven't read about? :) Just curious. Not sure how to fix the pic BTW??? Your toolbox may help. Cheers and take care! Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 01:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
No problem, here's the image history just to confirm:
The person responsible, User:Koolmatrixx, has been indefinitely blocked as a vandal account. Thankfully the image was harmless in contrast to some of the shock imagery we've been seeing by way of transcluded templates lately. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 01:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Gmail accountsDo they cost money? How much?--CJ King 03:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
UnblockThanks for your kind words. I'm still learning my way through the admin tools... Asteriontalk 12:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC) Davey HavokOnce again, you've removed information from an article I watch. This time, the information was cited. I did see your reasoning in the history, but there isn't much other way to cite the info. I would like to say, in the source's defense, that the information is coming from official sources (the official message board, the official myspace). In fact, the policy regarding sources only mentions personal websites [4], but I doubt that it means to say that citing the subject's own website is out of the question. Of course, this only touches upon the band's 'official' myspace. [5] The other citation, the forum, is an FAQ in the form of a forum post. The forum is AFI's official, hosted on their official fanclub's site [6]. Therefor, I think that it is an appropriate place to cite from, regardless of what format the media is in. Even if there is a policy that rejects forum-posts and myspaces as citable sources, I believe that these citations are special cases, and that their inclusion into the Davey Havok article is important to the end of improving and maintaining wikipedia, as per WP:IGNORE. - Enzo Dragon 23:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Tony Romo helpThanks for helping me with the Tony Romo vandalism. JelloSheriffBob 04:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Help with EastbourneI am trying to gather a small group of people to improve the Eastbourne article and writing to you as you have edited that page recently. I have set up a what needs to be done section on the talk page, and I am hoping that I will get a few people to start a discussion. It would be wonderful if you could spare a few minutes just to look at the current Eastbourne article and give your opinion. It would be even more wonderful if you could join in with this small project as well. Thank you MortimerCat 12:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC) Your nameYou have such a nice name, how did you choose it? --HIZKIAH (User • Talk) 17:43, 7 January 2007 (UTC) You have the best username on Wikipedia that I have seen yet.-JLSWiki 14:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC) Chaotic linksSome of the links are appropriate and have information on the show, even if some aren't. You should then review all links, if they don't have relevant information, then delete them. Also why does someone keep deleting the two tables? thanks82.41.208.201 07:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)(aka TheDalek, I forgot to sign in, again!)
Both reverted at same timeHwa Chong Institution still has problems. Apparently we both reverted it at the same instant. Please fix it or let me know if you want me to. thanks. Jerry lavoie 11:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
FreedomI'm urgently waiting to be freed from your autoblock. I'm confident a quick check of my record will make it plain that this is the appropriate action. Wareh 15:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Just a suggestionYou might want to take a look at WP:RPP. The admin backlog is slowly building up there. Diez2 16:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC) vandal only ipafter yr final warning there was this [7] & it's pretty much all this ip's been used for recently is similar. there's no way in hell these guys are going to sue (literally against their religion) but it is pretty annoying. cld it be sblocked or whatever? ⇒ bsnowball 18:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Kimberly Franklin on deletion reviewAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Kimberly Franklin. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 18:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Need some helpOk, so I'm new to the whole reverting vandalism thing and it seems as though I have accidentally gotten myself in between an editing war. Can you please help me?? If you can read my user talk page about the continuation war you will see what I mean. Sorry to bother you but I really need some "guidance from above".Plm209 20:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC) AutoblockActually, while I am able to make edits, it can be very cumbersome. To leave this comment, I had to clear and reload the page (CTRL-F5) three times. The first two times I got the autoblock message pertaining to 149.106.224.2. I've been experiencing the same symptoms editing articles and answering Ref. Desk questions. This IP is a shared college IP. If the Wikipedia software is supposed to let me edit from it as long as I'm signed in, then the Wikipedia software is not working well. In any case, I am a big fan of blocking vandals, but if there's not another solution, I'd humbly suggest that you unblock the IP, since the vandalism will probably have died down, and meanwhile I'm trying to improve articles. Wareh 20:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Airace (talk · contribs), who you blocked back in November for creating nonsense pages, is requesting to be unblocked. Do you remember if she create more deleted pages than just The Siege of Ytas? If it was just that one, it seems like she may genuinely have not known about Wikipedia, and perhaps should be given a second chance? Wanted to run it by you though, since you would know more about the situation, and were the blocking admin. Thanks, -- Natalya 21:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Problems with User 68.88.68.110This guy keeps vandalising the Ramones page and template, by adding an unsourced member to the band. When a source proved said member was not part of the band, he deleted the source. I have asked him repeatedly to stop be he has added back this wrongful information countless times. The person who he claims is in the band is Billy Rogers. You can look at the history of that page to see his vandalism. The history of the Ramones page will also identify this.Hoponpop69 22:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC) He is back at it. Can you please ban him or something? It is getting ridicolous. This time he is using the ip 68.88.73.0Hoponpop69 04:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC) User:68.88.76.165 a sock puppet of his has now violated the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule on the ramones page. Can you please put stop to this guy! Chair articleAntivandalbot made a misttakeon the Chair article and i cant revert the page. The Great White Hunter 01:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Overnight DeliveryI'm sorry, but I don't understand how Wikiquote is relevant to the Trivia section on the Overnight Delivery page. There are numerous movie entries which feature quotes from films, and they aren't removed to be added to Wikiquote. And this information is verified, and is a note of interest to trivia buffs, so I don't see what it hurts to leave this on the main Overnight Delivery page. --CJ 11:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Citing sourcesHi there -- I spoke to you before about the Pine Crest School page and you informed me that everythign on wikipedia needs quotes and that using the "citation needed" notation is not okay. Please see Maurice Wilkins -- the entire DNA section is basically marked "citation needed" after each sentence. By what you told me before, since you deleted my work off of the Pine Crest School page since it wasn't cited, does that mean that the entire DNA section on the Wilkins page should be deleted because there are no sources? I see these notations everywhere on almost every single page... Nadsat 18:00, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
My Request for Adminship
Hi, external links again. An editor has been adding details of a trip and external links to a site with which sings his praises and may be his own. These are the sort of additions and links that we agreed should not be added. I am told that 480 people climbed Everest this year, many for causes. If we all add our trip reports then the article will overflow with them. I reverted him twice but if I revert him again he will add them back again and I will be neutralised by 3RR. He makes no attempt to put the case on the talk page. Other editors of this site seem to be either not around or uninterested. Please advise me, thanks. Viewfinder 19:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC) Question for experienced editorI have a question concerning banning/blocking policy but I need to ask an editor very well-versed in wiki policy. Can you direct me to an experienced editor who can answer this question for me quickly? Or can you answer it for me? 141.213.211.12 19:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
I didn't say this was hypothetical. I need to know because I'm consistently accused of being a sockpuppet of various users and such arguments are being used to disenfranchise my edits. I don't know the circumstances behind the original block or what the original block was. I figured the best way to get around having to go deep into finding out why is seeing if its true that indef-banned users can't make good edits. In which case it would just be an illegitimate reasoning for reverting my edits. 141.213.211.12 20:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Template:Userbox unprotectionWould you please help me on editing the Template:Userbox. i've found from history tab that, you've re-protected it, after Aaron Brenneman unprotected it, on Dec 19, 2006. I want to add few extra features so that text line gap space and cell padding space, etc can also be specified, so that, overal height of userbox can be properly set at 45px, which is the recommended userbox height. Those feature will atleast give the option to do that. Also, see my comment on that template's discussion page. Many Thanks. --Tarikash 21:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC).
Shawn FeeneyThere is positively no reason for the deletion of Shawn Feeney. The article was being expanded and was deleted prematurely. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by EBisAWESOME (talk • contribs) 02:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC).
rateyourmusic.com vandalismHi clown, I'm getting a bit desperate, could you help me? This website is clearly taking the mick out of wikipedia for posting Rock Slope, and myself for requesting it be speedy deleted. My userpage has taken a hamering today since the aobve page has been in existance. Could you please look into speedying the original page asap, salting the page and protecting my userpage temporarily. The band are a hoax RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 02:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Block of Adam CarrGreetings! I hope you are well. User:Adam Carr claims you have accidentally blocked him while blocking an IP. Johntex\talk 07:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking the user I pointed out.It is times like that (User:J00sux0rz) when I see stuff which could be fixed on sight without needing to bring it to the attention of another admin because it is so obvious that I see the advantages of being an admin myself. However before I even consider going through RfA I thought it would be handy to start of by getting some comments from an established admin, hoping you would consent to spending a few minutes taking a look at what I've contributed to wikipedia so far and giving any tips from your experiences? Here is a handy link for you of wannabe kate's editcounter. [8] Thanks. Mathmo Talk 19:58, 11 January 2007 (UTC) Clown picture
Plastic PaddyHey, CSCWEM ;-) Thanks for closing the AfD. There seems to be a problem happening there now, though. 2 users who argued for deletion are now attacking the article and trying to remove sourced content. I am hesitant to just revert them as they have shown a tendency to edit-war in the past. Thoughts? ~ Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 23:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
AwardHey CSCWEM, I have something for you!!!!
!
 Witness Lee and Local churchesBart, some 'Christian apologists' (i.e. people that believe its their job to tell other people what to believe) continue to hack the Witness Lee and Local Churches articles. I'd like it if you could: A. Help me against them B. Notify a higher-up sysop to protect these articles. They should be objective, and Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place for proselytyzing. Sincerely, Robert Young → R Young {yakłtalk} 00:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Danny Daniel and suspected socksSince you were the one who blocked the vandal Danny Daniel, I'd like to ask you this question: When should I report Poppapop (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) to WP:AIV? I believe that this may be a sockpuppet of Danny Daniel (see WP:LTA#Danny Daniel and sockpuppets for more information) because the user edited articles related to The Fairly OddParents and anime (articles Fairy Idol and Avatar: The Last Airbender). The user also recreated the hoax article De-Animated, which is directly related to Re-Animated, another article in which Danny Daniel's sockpuppets seem to edit. I've already warned the user with verror2 for vandalising List of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy. Squirepants101 19:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Assistance needed with User:Riostat and TeknoscapeYou're the last admin I see having blocked someone listed on AIV, so I'm trying to get in touch with you - please see WP:AIV for details on the issue with User:Riostat, and note his contribution history now including vandalism of my talk page as well. Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. —Krellis 04:34, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Passover (Rome)Can you tell me then, why are you deleting all that content, because from what I can tell, their is no reason to, unless I am missing something.--RyanB88 04:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Robert Fleming & Co.I think I disagree with your deletions of the reference to The Fleming-Wyfold Art Foundation. This foundation seems to be legitimate (see http://www.ffandp.co.uk/activities/art.asp), and are directly on point (Flemings collection of Scottish art). Could you please revert them or explain the thinking in deleting them? Thanks. Cbmccarthy 14:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
PuzzledIn this ([9]) diff, is there a reason why you deleted my question? I assume it was an accident, but didn't want to repost it if I've been a fewl and akst a stooopid kweschun. --Dweller 14:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Fortnight?that was a strange block: Length: 5 fortnights "repeated vandalism for several days" →AzaToth 20:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC) :)
Google Web AcceleratorWhy can't I edit a page if Google Web Accelerator is activated?? -ilovevancouver90909 21:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Suspecting another sockpuppetHello Can't sleep, clown will eat me. I noticed a somewhat suspicious post on my talk page by a user called User:Fathatsack. I looked through their contributions and found this edit summary in their contributions, which links to one of those pesky java script loops. A sockpuppet of JINXTENGU left the same java script loop in a message by one of his sockpuppets as shown here. I really think this is another sockpuppet of his. I appreciate your opinion. Thanks.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 02:34, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Tony Yayo pageMy bad about the text dump I did, but why does the Studio album information continually get removed??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harish101 (talk • contribs) 08:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
AdministratorHello Clown, I need to ask you a Question ....... How do i become an Administrator?? Please help me! thankyou Vandle-Fighter14 Copyright violation: BoubliThe above article was recently speedy deleted for a copyright violation whilst on AfD, but Uncle G who speedy deleted it hasn't closed the AfD, could you look into closing it for me? Cheers RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 13:34, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks and a pleaThanks for keeping an eye on articles like Pony. I have requested semi-protection for it (again.) If you have any pull with TPTB for getting the article protected for a week or so, please add your support. Maybe if we protect it for awhile, the people who think it's their sandbox will go play elsewhere. (Why do they want to pick on Ponies, anyway??) Thanks Montanabw 20:12, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
ThanksRevision as of 00:58, 17 January 2007 (edit) 124.183.176.155 (Talk) (Before the European arrival) Your revert on Indig Australians is appreciated you reverted a sockpuppet of a serial pest - I felt that you should know that SatuSuro 01:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC) Through a number of issues - I have given User:Longhair a full detailed list of actions re that user ( I can send a blow by blow outline if you request - otherwise I'll leave it with what I have sent so far) - I am supposing if you both have it on your watchlist - and your time zone diffs - we are in a matter of speaking covered :) As for the nullabor demoscene afd - keep - I am interested to see that how afd process can get hijacked to notoriety when the original issue gets more or less ignored - that has happened on two this week, I think there is good argument for alternative measures at this stage - but as I am a plain old ed and no admin - I shall just watch and learn I suppose. Thank you for your help and offer of help in these areas - keep up the good work! SatuSuro 11:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm new hereI've been trying to revert as much vandalism as I can. I'm new here. I just want to know some of the popular people on here. --Lexon darkheart 20:22, 18 January 2007 (UTC) Oh yeah, have you heard of Homestar Runner? --Lexon darkheart 20:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Hell Yeah reviewAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Hell_Yeah. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Tedivm 07:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Joseph VijayHello, Can't sleep, clown will eat me (can I call you Clown or something equally shorter?) I noticed what you did on Joseph Vijay's article. I'd love to rewrite the entire article (along Ajith Kumar, but that's another story) and will provide reliable reference, but could you help me to keep the article clean afterwards? There are many fans out there and arguing has proven to quite exhausting, especially when you are alone. What do you think? Best regards, --Plumcouch Talk2Me 17:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a ton! --Plumcouch Talk2Me 17:43, 20 January 2007 (UTC) Hello, Clown, I have re-added the "Personal section" and referenced it with Hindu.com and Rediff. Both have been reliable in the past. Think that's okay? --Plumcouch Talk2Me 18:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Collateral damageHi, Clown. I trust your judgement, but see here User talk:Peterwhy#Autoblocked. Ninety minutes of collateral damage is not the worst price to pay to stop vandalism, but I'd thought I'd let you know. Take care. -- Avi 16:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC) Rusty tromboneAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Rusty trombone. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. CyberAnth 02:33, 22 January 2007 (UTC) External linksHi, I noticed you'd reverted the links I added. I read the guidelines before adding links, and felt the ones I added came under this category: Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons. For example, this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Costa_del_Sol has little information, but if you look at the page http://www.andalucia.com/costa_del_sol/home.htm the information is much more comprehensive, and of course it's not possible to use this writing directly due to copyright reasons. Please explain further. Is it always the case that you have to discuss additions on the talk page? I thought content could be added directly. I wasn't aware that everything had to be verified by a wikipedia editor first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.5.83.159 (talk • contribs) 08:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Looks like this is a vandal-only account. Got to love his contribs... :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 09:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC) New warning gridHeya! I don't know if you had the time to check the new warning templates that went live an hour ago. You can find them at the usual place: WP:UTM. Hope you'll like them since you were involved on the project at the start if I remember well. -- lucasbfr talk 21:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC) Yisroel Dovid Weisspage was protected because of multiple libellous edits. these continued on the talk page. there is every reason to expect they will be ongoing. could you please reconsider unprotecting it. ⇒ bsnowball 10:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Casa Blanca RifaSince you seem to be the resident SoCal gang expert (or at least the SoCal gang article vandal-whacker—that's where I usually see your edits on my watchlist, except for the occasional haiku vandal revert), I was wondering if you would take a look at this new article: Casa Blanca Rifa. (Amazingly, it's already indexed by Google.) If you googlesearch -Wikipedia you only get 14 hits. To me, it looks like about 20% Original research, and 80% Nonsense ("It's notoriety grew when gang members shot down a police helicopter in the mid 1970s, then again in the early 1990s."). I've already caught the article creator, Loco 13 (talk · contribs), creatively editing the demographics data in Riverside, California and left a warning on their talk page. BlankVerse 12:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Vandal accountI think you should block him, he's a vandal account Anticvs (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) --HIZKIAH (User • Talk) 18:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC) Adding death dates to biographies of living personsI have noted a recent increase in this form of blatant vandalism. Imo it is obnoxious, because it is not immediately obvious to readers and anti-vandal patrollers. Like vandalism by registered users, it tends to go unreverted for much longer than obvious vandalism. Recently it survived on the page of a well known UK politician for 48 hours. and should imo be responded to with bv warnings and block on first and second offence respectively. See 195.137.115.129 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), who has reoffended after my bv warning. Still, if that is not Wikipedia policy, then I will respond to it with milder warnings on first offence. As an active vandal patroller, perhaps you could advise. Thanks. Viewfinder 19:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC) Hi! I had accidently re-reverted your removal of vandalism. Sorry for the trouble. Just wanted to tell you that I am not a vandal :)--æn↓þæµß¶-ŧ-¢ 16:46, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
MACan you take a look at [10] this 3RR report? I note that you semi'd the page, so presumably have an opinion as to whether its libel or not. Thanks! William M. Connolley 20:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC) Another JINXTENGU SockHello Can't sleep, got another JINXTENGU sock for you: User:Froshk.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 01:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC) Do you know who this might be?Here. User created an account and then went after your vandal box with something about Teletubes? No need to reply to me, just thought you might want to check. Teke (talk) 03:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC) Andrew GowerCould you please be explicit about the libel concerns that led you to protect Andrew Gower. Not an interested party, just ran across it, but if you could be explicit about whether the subject made objections and what they were that would be helpful. Thanks, Sdedeo (tips) 07:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC) October RevolutionI guess you do have to take a nap now and then :-0), otherwise clowns will get you one way or another `'mikka 17:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
They are picking on ponies againAnother round of kids vandalizing the pony article again. Any advice on getting semi-protection? I keep being turned down...sigh... Montanabw 19:16, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Block requestCumming14 (talk • contribs) can you block the vandal please? Calbaer 19:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC) Chilean editsHello, Can't sleep, clown will eat me/9, since you have made several edits to articles about Chile, you may be interested in looking at the Wikipedia:Chile-related regional notice board to pick up on other topics that need attention, or to express needs which you perceive pertaining to Chile. JAXHERE | Talk 01:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC) Tamaskan Dog recreationYou were the admin who deleted this article. The article's proponent has now created a new article. I'm wondering what the recommended procedure is for a situation like this ... recreate the article after an AfD, or request a deletion review. Thanks for your help! Keesiewonder talk 10:18, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Overlapping imagesIt's hard to read your user page as your images overlap and the vandal box has somehow creeped up the page and is covering things. Simply south 15:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Help needed fastYou just reverted vandalism by 209.7.96.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), so he switched to 10 successive vandal pranks on Nuclear Weapon. I need admin help pronto, and can barely keep up with this prankster....HJ 21:10, 26 January 2007 (UTC) Mucho graciasHJ 06:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC) About Lloyd Banks Page?Thanks for te note but i dont relly understand wut u ment can u give me some help? User talk:Killian35 Orphaned fair use image (Image:LUEshi_-_Patamon.png)Thanks for uploading Image:LUEshi_-_Patamon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hbdragon88 01:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC) PleaseYou just blocked User:Cheesepie123 indef for vandalism, yet they have still vandalized my userpage from an ip. would you mind blocking this as well? User:89.241.221.121DUBJAY04 06:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC) Thank you!.. for reverting the persistent vandal who keeps hitting my user page. Thanks! :) - Alison✍ 07:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC) Wikibreak?Hi, although I don't want to become a player myself, could you explain to me the rules of the game you're playing? I think it's called Thaddeus Young. All the best, <KF> 11:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC) KwinanaI am trying to think about which template to put in for that one:) I might wait till later for that though... Thanks for the reverts SatuSuro 07:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Local churchesBart, someone inserted a libelous attack message on the local churches talk page which includes some kind of illegal insertion to prevent further editing. When I tried to respond, the SPAM FILTER blocked me...but only for this section. Clearly, whoever planted this 'bomb' knew what they were doing. How can labeling a church as 'organized crime' be a fair discussion? How can not allowing an alternative viewpoint be fair (the sheer hypocrisy of which is astounding...the charge made below is not allowing alternative viewpoints, yet the user inserted a Trojan spam to prevent alternative viewpoints). Please forward this to a higher editor. Clearly, an attack like this is no different than someone labeling Martin Luther King Jr a "Communist", attacking gays, etc.→ R Young {yakłtalk} 11:30, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Writer bewareLike entries on similar organizations, such as Scientology and the Jehovah's Witnesses, no fair discussion can take place on this topic. If anyone dare edit this article, it will be swiftly and aggressively reverted to reflect only the official point of view of the Local Church and its headquarters, the Living Stream Ministry. Try it. What darkness fears most is the bright light of day.
Don't even bother to note it is "controversial"I will now notify arguably the best moderator. Extremely sexy 14:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Cdojo78Grsh darn it, I was stalking that one! :) Teke (talk) 23:24, 29 January 2007 (UTC) CuriouscdngeorgeHe is a persistent vandal (look here), at least at the John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon articles, plus I noticed he doesn't answer questions at his talkpage either, so he definitely deserve to be banned for a long time at least: could you do just that for me, please, man? Extremely sexy 00:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC) Deletion review notificationAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Marsden-Donnelly harassment case. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ~ trialsanderrors 19:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC) Happy Valentines Day!
Kamope · talk · contributions 12:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Ajith KumarHello, Clown, additionally to Joseph Vijay's site, I'm trying to tidy up Ajith Kumar's site. Unfortunately, an editor, User:Anwar saadat keeps adding tons of fangush. There have been problems with Anwar in the past, especially about his involvement in Kumar's article. Could you help to keep the article clean? Best regards, --Plumcouch Talk2Me 22:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Those imagesHey Clown, can you do me a favour and respond to Jeffness's questions about image licensing? I already pointed out to him that you have every right to revert messages on your talk page, but his last message seemed pretty civilized, and rolling it back without a response doesn't seem right. I think he's correct on this point; a photo of a Pepsi bottle -- even one that you take yourself -- still contains images that are copyrighted by Pepsi. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC) Adding adminsHey CSCWEM: I have another wiki on a different page, and I was wondering how you add administrators to the admin list? Vikedal 04:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Parse error: parse error, unexpected $ in /homepages/12/d168542623/htdocs/pyrosummit/wiki/includes/HTMLForm.php on line 129 Vikedal 05:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC) Front pageCan you, please, put History of the guillotine in Russia on the front page? I want people to know about the article I am writing. --Linear Model 08:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC) Continuing vandalism alert: I thought that you might be interested that User:TRFA is stripping out a section in the woman article on women's advances and is stripping out a list of women premiers and other political leaders such as Tansu Ciller, Condoleezza Rice and Nancy Pelosi from the woman article. Dogru144 18:34, 4 February 2007 (UTC) Your Talk PagePlease consider moving your talk page to the Archives folder. It is getting pretty hard to navigate it because it is too long. Thanks. King Lopez 09:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC) HelloJust a friendly Hello to a Fellow Vandalism Fighter! :^) §†SupaSoldier†§ 01:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Barnstar
DRV on October AFDAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Sarah Hanson-Young. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. The claimed issue is mostly inconsistency with a later AFD. GRBerry 03:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC) |
){kind=link}