|
User talk:CYl7EPTEMA777Welcome
BirdsHi, thanks for your contribution to wikipedia. I agree to your wording on talking birds. Utter is better. It's unfortunated you came across DrChrissy and her gang who like to play politics. Many editor's have raised concern of conflict of interests and ownership of DrChrissy. 124.149.103.50 (talk) 00:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Censorship of your talk page
TemplateData is hereHey CYl7EPTEMA777 I'm sending you this because you've made quite a fewedits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :). So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere. What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default. The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page. Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:18, 28 June 2013 (UTC) May I suggest that you review, or have someone with an understanding of English review for you, WP:COMPETENCE. Among those I've seen, the percentage of your statements on talk pages which have a possible meaning in English number less than 10%; those with a possible meaning with a connection to reality (or Wikipedia guidelines) is even smaller. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:50, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Talking bird (cognition) for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talking bird (cognition) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talking bird (cognition) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dbrodbeck (talk) 22:39, 4 March 2014 (UTC) Regarding discussion on WP:ANI
Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CYl7EPTEMA777, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. I am One of Many (talk) 17:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC) March 2014 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 16:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Category:Project KokoCategory:Project Koko, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. I am One of Many (talk) 20:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed that at one point you had moved this template to "Andromeda Galaxy" (as it should be) but for some reason it is now "Andromeda galaxy." Could you help me move it to "Template:Andromeda Galaxy?" Italia2006 (talk) 02:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC) Dispute resolutionHello. There is a dispute-resolution case about your on the noticeboard 124.168.48.21 (talk) 04:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC) Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Marian Dawkins". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 04:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC) |
