User talk:CENSEI

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CENSEI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not disputing my block, I could quite frankly give a rats ass about Wikipedia and or editing it as I hve evidently run afoul of the queer mafia running this asylum. What I am a little more than pissed off about is Xenophrenic's bullshit allegations that I am anyones sockpupet, as far`as I am concerned those are borderline fighting words and I wont stand for it. At any rate, please unblock me for the purpose of defneding myself or if any of the invovled want to email me to hear my side please do so: censei@yahoo.com and if not then go fuck yourselves. And if anything else comes of this, take the fucking sockpuppet tag of my user page. CENSEI (talk) 18:34, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you are not requesting unblock, this is not the appropriate template. This template is for unblock requests. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:35, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Care to elaborate? CENSEI (talk) 18:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You used the unblock template. But you weren't requesting an unblock. So I disabled it. The other matter doesn't appear relevant; you have been blocked since April, so I cannot imagine how you even happened to notice that checkuser request. You don't appear to be asking for any specific action, and I doubt that anyone is interested enough to email you for 'your side,' since no one was even interested enough to actually run a checkuser. There's no need for you to 'defend yourself;' you're already indefinitely blocked, so nothing more can be done to you- there's nothing to defend yourself from. Your name is vaguely familiar to me, but I don't remember who you are or why you are blocked, and I don't care enough to look at your histories. I can't think of any action which could be taken here that would make the encyclopedia better, so there's no point in taking any action. I hope that is sufficient elaboration for you. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:58, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A freind told me about the witchhunt .. I mean checkuser and I was livid when I found out. As for the rest I do feel the need to defend myself. Its a little something called honor, and it would seem that you are as unfmailiar with that concept as you are with me, but I suppose that after seeing your user page your animosity it better understood. CENSEI (talk) 19:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As I suspect you know, you are not permitted to remove previous requests if you are still requesting unblock. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:16, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CENSEI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not disputing my block so that I may edit articles, I could quite frankly give a rats ass about Wikipedia and/or editing it as I hve evidently run afoul of the queer mafia running this asylum. What I am a little more than pissed off about is Xenophrenic's bullshit allegations that I am anyones sockpupet, as far`as I am concerned those are borderline fighting words and I wont stand for it. At any rate, please unblock me for the purpose of defneding myself or if any of the invovled want to email me to hear my side please do so: censei@yahoo.com and if not then go fuck yourselves. And if anything else comes of this, take the fucking sockpuppet tag of my user page. CENSEI (talk) 19:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Further offensive non-requests will result in this page being protected. This is where you defend yourself, although you may want to read this guide before attempting to do so again, as you're on your last chance. Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:35, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How was my request "offensive"? Please be specific.

How the hell do I defend myself via the talk page? The action is not here, its over at the RfCu page? This is, btw, not the first time I have been accused of sockpuppetry and it was as much bullshit then as it is now and I am fucking sick of it. CENSEI (talk) 19:47, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Read your request back carefully, and see if you can identify anything in it which might hurt the feelings of a reader. I'm confident that you'll find it. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]