User talk:C1K98V/Archive/2021

Happy New Year!

Empire AS ^Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2020 and tomorrow will be 2026. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2026. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Empire AS ^Talk! 19:24, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaatelal & Sons (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Kaatelal & Sons may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Amanda (aka DQ) 14:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kaatelal & Sons

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kaatelal & Sons, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hatchens (talk) 03:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jijaji Chhat Parr Koii Hai

Now, the article has been improved after the addition of more content laced with more appropriate references. So, please consider removing the deletion tag and let the good development happen. FlyIndian14 (talk) 14:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@FlyIndian14: hello, I checked the articles. The reference used is still lacking. It's too soon, and the subject isn't yet notable enough to have a mainspace article. The YouTube link is unnecessary and shouldn't be used as reference. Thanks --C1K98V ^(💬 ✒️ 📂) 16:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Punyashlok Ahilyabai

Can you please review the Draft:Punyashlok Ahilyabai. It now has references.--user (talk) 16:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jijaji Chhat Parr Koi Hai

Hi, Can you share the list of reliable and non reliable sources with me ? It would help me to improve my editing. Thank You Mann Rocks (talk) 05:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review

Wikipedia mini globe handheld

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hum Bhi Akele Tum Bhi Akele

The article Hum Bhi Akele Tum Bhi Akele has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE except film database sites and promotional materials.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:31, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hum Bhi Akele Tum Bhi Akele for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hum Bhi Akele Tum Bhi Akele is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hum Bhi Akele Tum Bhi Akele until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 11:48, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Hi...can you please upload the image of Vani Bhojan in Wikimedia commons. She have three images but not nice so kindly upload. My humble request to you sir please. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4072:6D91:DEF9:3F42:1C06:3087:1955 (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake

I clearly did leave an edit summary linking to the Wikipedia guideline, WP:PERFNAV. 188.148.229.11 (talk) 06:10, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unqualified reversions

Please can you desist from making unqualified reversions to edits without justification. Furthermore (Personal attack removed) I am not sure how your knowledge of the subject matter could comprehend private hire in the United Kingdom - a country I have lived in all my life? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.231.143 (talk) 14:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You incorrectly reverted my revision

On the buffalo bill's wild west page, Chief Long Wolf is once referred to incorrectly as "Lone Wolf." I fixed that, and you reverted it to the incorrect name. Please look at the context of your edit. If the man is referred to as "Long Wolf" everywhere else, including in the article's sources, and as "Lone Wolf" just once, which do you think is the correct name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.74.253.120 (talk) 04:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rollbacking good-faith edits and restoring incorrect content

Hi, C1K98V. I noticed that you recently restored incorrect content to List of EGOT winners, which User:Station1 has since removed. Just a friendly reminder that "unexplained removal" is not in itself grounds for reversion. You, the reverting editor, still have an obligation to check for reasons that the removal may have been justified. In this case, the content in question had been added only an hour prior to its removal, linked to a section of the list that does not exist, cited no references, and referred to its subject as a "Make Believe Influencer".

Mistakes happen when patrolling for vandalism, and I understand that, but I was concerned to find, when I came to your userpage, that you had not addressed three recent complaints from editors you'd reverted:

1. At Template:Blake Shelton you edit-warred with 188.148.229.11 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) to restore content they'd removed citing a guideline, even after they notified you that your revert was incorrect.
2. Without condoning the offensive statement by 82.45.231.143 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) above, they are correct that this was a good-faith change, and I would say a constructive one.
3. This edit by 71.74.253.120 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) was not a factual error, as could be inferred from the surrounding text.

Furthermore, in all four of these cases, you made use of rollback, which is intended for only for clear-cut issues like vandalism. And one should always be prepared to answer for reverts one makes, especially ones made via rollback.

Please be much more careful in the edits you revert, and in the cases in which you use rollback. Not all IP edits are vandalism. Not all unexplained removals are vandalism. And definitely don't rollback edits that make good-faith appeals to policy or guideline. A few extra seconds vetting a potential revert saves a lot of cleaning up afterward and reduces the risk of scaring away new users. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 06:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also Special:Diff/1029468952, which was reverted by Paul 012. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 06:42, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful with your use of Rollback and make sure you are including a relevant warning, not giving confusing warnings that tell editors they should be adding citations to plot sections.[1] -- 109.76.130.179 (talk) 03:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unrelevant

Why did you delete this as "unrelevant"? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sex_offender_registries_in_the_United_States&diff=1029460972&oldid=1029460927

Ir runs such a registry.

Also, you made use of rollback, which is intended for only for clear-cut issues like vandalism. --2603:7000:2143:8500:A45A:209F:A050:704A (talk) 14:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I must agree with some of the concerns expressed in the last few messages. United States Center for SafeSport does seems relevant to Sex_offender_registries_in_the_United_States, especially as a "See also" addition, and certainly not subject to rollback. I've restored it. Station1 (talk) 15:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Station -- many thanks. 2603:7000:2143:8500:A45A:209F:A050:704A (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My addition to Survivorship Bias

You wrote: Hello, I'm C1K98V. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Survivorship bias, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:39, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Wow. I provided an excellent, easily understood, and humorous example of survivor bias, and you deleted it because it doesn't provide a source. It was a funny story! I bet you're a lot of fun at parties.

Who Is Subhankar Singh That You Are again And again adding his name in the citation??!!

I have been seeing you that you are continuously adding the name subhankar singh replacing the name Abhishek Nigam who is the actual lead of the show. Stop doing this!!! Kishmish Hu Main Ok (talk) 15:13, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Kishmish Hu Main Ok:, I hope you're doing well. I was trying to fix the mos for the top of the Hero Article. And apologize that the name which you mentioned above didn't caught my eyes, or else I should have rectified my edit. Thanks for informing me. Stay safe. --C1K98V ^(💬 ✒️ 📂) 02:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern about rollback usage

Hello @Tamzin, Paul 012, and Station1: and IP editor. I apologize for not responding and addressing the concern you raised above. Yeah I understand that rollback should not be used to revert good faith edits. I didn't have any bad intention to violate any policy. I was just trying to help out. I will be more cautious when using rollback and only to revert obvious vandalism. Thanks for letting me know about my mistake. Stay safe. --C1K98V ^(💬 ✒️ 📂) 02:26, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring over proposed deletion template

Please check the notice on the proposed deletion template which says not to replace it if the template is removed. If you desire an article to be deleted there are other ways. Edit warring despite very clear template instructions will only see you blocked for continuing to do so. -- Longhair\^talk 06:48, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Longhair: I never intended to create havoc. I was just trying to revert what was not wrong. I understand if the editor disagree, he will continue to revert your edits and a edit warring will occur. Thanks for informing me. I will refrain from making any edits to the article. --C1K98V ^(💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:53, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're edit warring for a lost cause. The proposed deletion template clearly says if it is removed don't replace it. The other editor could do with some civility also, but please don't replace the template. While they are being somewhat disruptive in edit summaries, you'll lose out when the edits are looked at and others see you're replacing what should never have been replaced. -- Longhair\^talk 06:56, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do agree with you. I will be more cautious the next dealing with something like these. Honestly, I didn't want to break the 3 revert rule. Thank you, for guiding me. --C1K98V ^(💬 ✒️ 📂) 07:02, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've issued the other editor a brief block for disruptive editing. It's easy to argue here, but I was hoping to make you aware that sometimes it's just not worth it. Thanks. -- Longhair\^talk 07:37, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Longhair: I assure you, I wont repeat the mistake what I did. I will only use the tools to do positive contribution. --C1K98V ^(💬 ✒️ 📂) 07:41, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bhagya Lakshmi.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bhagya Lakshmi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bade Achhe Lagte Hain 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bade Achhe Lagte Hain 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Raavan Leela.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Raavan Leela.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my file

I had uploaded a file on wikipedia common file name Devjoshi281.jpg with a suitable license. But it has been deleted by you. Would you please tell me why did you delete and that does not relate to Sony sab or Sony pal. Unknown Devian28 (talk) 04:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Unknown Devian28: I hope you're doing well. It's really sad and dishearting that your upload got deleted. But I'm a volunteer here just like you, I didn't delete your file. Please have a look at your commons talk page CptViraj posted a message for you. Thanks, Have a nice day. --C1K98V ^(💬 ✒️ 📂) 04:52, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Molkki.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Molkki.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eagulls

Hi, I have a source but idk how to add it ! Postpunkgroupie (talk) 13:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Postpunkgroupie: Please have a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources. Thanks --C1K98V ^(💬 ✒️ 📂) 13:49, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Like, it's silly that the wiki page said they "were" a band without any source Postpunkgroupie (talk) 13:49, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'm gonna look into it x Postpunkgroupie (talk) 13:50, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ziddi Dil Maane Na.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ziddi Dil Maane Na.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging pages for speedy deletion

Hello, C1K98V,

Most of the pages that you tagged for CSD G5 deletion were not eligible under this CSD criteria. Please review Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G5. Creations by banned or blocked users before tagging any more pages so you understand what appropriate conditions must exist for this criteria to be valid. It depends on the blocking history of both the sockpuppeteer and sockpuppet, the date of creation of the article and whether or not other contributions have been made by other editors. Thank you. Liz ^Read! Talk! 07:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhadkan Zindaggi Kii (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dhadkan Zindaggi Kii and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dhadkan Zindaggi Kii, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 14:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dhadkan Zindaggi Kii.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dhadkan Zindaggi Kii.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]