User talk:Burzuchius

Welcome!

Hello, Burzuchius, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Double sharp (talk) 11:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your message! I will participate in Wikipedia with great pleasure and try to use your wishes. Burzuchius (talk) 16:00, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome! Double sharp (talk) 10:25, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PT10.png

Hello Burzuchius. I have responded to your query on my talk page re this file. Sandbh (talk) 03:23, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Latin-script trigraphs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bosch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Natural occurrence of Es-253

Hello, Burzuchius. You have new messages at Talk:Actinide#Natural isotopes.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Double sharp (talk) 11:08, 28 January 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Burzuchius. You have new messages at Double sharp's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Double sharp (talk) 13:39, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Chalcogen

Must've misread the source. It said ±2, 4, 6. I initially thought the ± referred to all three numbers, but that actually makes no sense. I'll remove it.King Jakob C2 15:06, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Padonkaffsky jargon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • <blockquote>''"Because? It's LIVEJOURNAL. An American website. Not an albanian; (#*!@()! site.
  • The unstressed letter {{angbr|[[O (Cyrillic)|о]]}} is replaced by {{{angbr|[[а]]}}, and sometimes the other way round. The unstressed letters {{angbr|[[Ye (Cyrillic)|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:48, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ukrainian alphabet, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 15 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hypervalent molecule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valence. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited English words without vowels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rng. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Burzuchius. You have new messages at Double sharp's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Double sharp (talk) 02:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ch y Ll in Spanish

Hi, I am a native spanish-speaker and until the beginning of 2000s the CH and the Ll were letters of the abecedary in all dialects of Spains, and is know that historically it has been. i hadnt read the works of Antonio Nebrija, but is more clear that could have its origins in medieval Spanish, because that yet currently there much words in Spanish using the Ch joint and Ll in old words as in proper names. silla (chair), chaval (can be from old spanish because had variations in peninsular spanish, as chavo/chavito in mexican spanish), chollo, charco, llavero, infinities of words that are used in books and papers of the colony, ad normally today are used.--Vvven (talk) 21:42, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

our game

Um. Can't I just take it? I don't see any dirty tricks at play. Double sharp (talk) 12:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want a draw by agreement? I see that my check can be perpetual.Burzuchius (talk) 15:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So, I took the queen... Double sharp (talk) 15:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
22.Qg7# Double sharp (talk) 15:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to discuss on Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Cyrillic)

Hello! As there is already an only proposed Wikipedia guideline on naming conventions (Cyrillic). The proposal is still in development, under discussion and needs of gathering consensus for adoption. Since I am well experienced on this subject, I would like to criticize the official transliteration of Bulgarian as it gives too many errors, which also causes some losses of sounds “ǎ (a hacek”), decentralise itself from other slavic languages (“c” and “š” voices), which is also conflicting in itself (see street signs 1 and 2). By this revision, it is away from being accurate and not able to satisfy the needs of an encyclopedia which claims to be scientifical. These are the reasons I invite you to read Scientific transliteration of Cyrillic and involve the discussion in order to contribute a possible concensus. Wish to see you here thanks Manaviko (talk) 13:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 31 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hg and Cn

Thank you! From what I see, the most recent Cn (and Fl) predictions are for very volatile and inert elements that nevertheless are still metals and undergo metallic bonding (seen experimentally with Cn–Au and Fl–Au metallic bonds). I would personally bet that the most common oxidation state of Cn will not be +4 but 0. Recent studies incidentally place even the existence of CnF4 in doubt. So stands firmly the periodic table, steering its elements deftly between the twin threats from relativity and quantum mechanics. Double sharp (talk) 13:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Burzuchius. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Burzuchius. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neutron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isobar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

From the site you gave for the Russian proposal of "becquerelium" for element 110

I see the front page of the cite has an animation which looks to have some names that were considered for the transcalifornium elements: I see that 102 (joliotium), 103 (rutherfordium), 104 (kurchatovium), 105 (nielsbohrium) are there exactly as we give, and it looks like we instead have 113 (becquerelium), 114 (dubnium), 115 (langevinium), and 116 (flerovium). Do you know who's there for 112? I can't see the symbol very clearly and I'm slightly ashamed to say that I don't recognise the person. Double sharp (talk) 05:21, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These names of the elements 113–116 are a proposal of the author of that site (Артём Буслаев) who considered that IUPAC and IUPAP underestimated Soviet research. For 112, he proposed "lavrentium", after Lavrentiy Beria, and for 118, "moscovium" (with the symbol Mw, which suggests the spelling "moscowium"). After IUPAC approval of 112, 114, and 116, Buslayev changed his proposal: 102–105 by Soviet names, 107 as dubnium (so Niels Bohr and Dubna come to be swapped in comparison to the IUPAC version), 106, 108–112, 114, and 116 by IUPAC names. Burzuchius (talk) 09:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting; even if I dislike "lavrentium" as a name (Beria only supervised the project; Kurchatov is a more worthy eponym IMHO; and why does it use his first name?), it is interesting to see how it is close to "lawrencium" (and, indeed, IUPAC considered changing its name to "laurentium" to make it easier to use in other languages).
I do sympathise with his opinion to some extent; I'm not terribly impressed by the standards applied by the most recent JWPs, and I think that if you were accommodating enough you could reasonably give Dubna credit for all of elements 102–108 (and I have voiced that opinion here based on the standards applied for elements 114 and 116). But I would not go that far myself; in fact, I rather agree with the TWG's conclusions (if not the JWP's; for one thing, I still think there is reasonable doubt for elements 115 and 117 at least), and I only think that element 102 should indeed have been renamed to "joliotium". Double sharp (talk) 16:21, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Burzuchius. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oxidating barnstar, with a state

periodic table
The Oxidating Barnstar for improving the Periodic Table
You are meticulously keeping the List of oxidation states in high level of quality! Please keep going, thanks from WP:ELEMENTS – DePiep (talk) 20:29, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DePiep, thank you very much for the barnstar! Burzuchius (talk) 20:54, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, re ox states

To be clear: yes, please keep editing & improving the main live table [1].

Later on this week I will switch over (the sandbox into mainspace), but I will allways check recent edits. -DePiep (talk) 21:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of adoption dates of the Gregorian calendar per country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dunno, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daisy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comparison of Danish, Norwegian and Swedish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conjugation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I'm sorry my edit summary at Latin Wikipedia suggested that your edit had been vandalism. I was reverting vandalism, but I mistakenly reverted your good edit at the same time. Thanks for restoring it. Andrew Dalby 08:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Russian alphabet

Hi. I think you may be right. My phrasebook has other errors, but Berlitz is Berlitz Corporation. If you know, can you explain why the letter Э was called э оборо́тное before. I thought it was like и краткое, so there was и, и краткое, and и оборо́тное, otherwise why wasn't it just called "Э" before? UserTwoSix (talk) 17:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • The letter Э comes from reversing the letter Е, hence the word оборо́тное (backwards). One may argue that saying э оборо́тное is pleonastic, it should be either just э or е оборо́тное, but apparently there was some confusion on naming the letters е and э. Yakov Grot wrote: "буква е представляет йотованную, или облегченную, гласную, почему и название ея в азбуке должно произноситься «йэ», а не «э», как обыкновенно ее называют". So, the name э оборо́тное was used to distinguish э from е. Now the usual name of э is just э, but э оборо́тное is occasionally used when one wants to emphasize: "э and not е". Burzuchius (talk) 18:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited German orthography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actinium(II) in oxidation state

Isn't it an electride? The article cited doesn't mention oxidation state, but if it's analogous to lanthanum dihydride, it should be an electride too. Double sharp (talk) 15:22, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think it is an electride. It was not me who added Ac(II). Burzuchius (talk) 15:32, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Do you think we should remove it from the list? Double sharp (talk) 15:36, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps yes. Burzuchius (talk) 15:40, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay.  Done Double sharp (talk) 15:54, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why not on a relevant talkpage? By now all edits are source-related. DePiep (talk) 16:08, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@DePiep: I wasn't sure which the most watched talk page would be (maybe Talk:Oxidation state, maybe Template talk:List of oxidation states of the elements, so I asked someone I knew had been maintaining the list. Feel free to copy this over to wherever you think it's more relevant. Double sharp (talk) 16:24, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I get such reasonable background, but the oxistates changes are so specialistic by now (no low hanging electrons any more) that documentation & related talk better be ~central. As in: searchable talk archives. And yes could be multiple talkpages. DePiep (talk) 16:41, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vanadium

I have for some time had misgivings about attributing the discovery of vanadium to del Río, because he thereafter rejected his own claim, even though he was right. Is he more often credited these days?

Thanks for the updates to the discovery timeline, BTW: I had wondered about Na and K. It's good to have this 2022 review, because since discovering earths and elements were sort of identified in the XVIII century, it finally allows us to have more reasonable discovery dates, and not attribute a ton of metals to Davy when everyone already suspected they were there. (Of course, he belongs in history as the isolator.)

But who should we attribute fluorine to? Lavoisier? Scheele? Double sharp (talk) 15:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a rare source (in Russian) that does not attribute many discoveries to Davy: [2]. The table in the source places K, Na, Ca, Si after P and H (attributed to Boyle, 1671) and before Co. But who is meant, I don't know. Burzuchius (talk) 16:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that mentions Scheele for fluorine indeed. I must get a hold of what he actually wrote. Double sharp (talk) 03:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, I was wrong about del Río. I had taken Paneth's word for it that he rejected his older claim, but Marshall and Marshall present evidence that this is not the case. And Berzelius and Wöhler themselves agreed that vanadium was identical to del Río's erythronium. So, I've restored him. Double sharp (talk) 14:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Russian name of astatine

Do you know approximately when it lost the suffix? I know it's астатин rather than астат in some early papers e.g. [3]. Double sharp (talk) 07:32, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AFAIK 1962, see here: [4]. Burzuchius (talk) 08:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!
Has anyone yet made the analogous suggestion for Ts? Double sharp (talk) 08:49, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The suggestion exists informally: [5]. Burzuchius (talk) 09:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, thanks!
And I see there's also some discussion on whether Fl should have a yo or not. Double sharp (talk) 09:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Numbering floors in Georgia

Hi, in Georgian shopping centers like City Mall and East Point use European system. Michael Peter Fustumum (talk) 21:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Probably this is because Georgians now want to look less Russian and more European. Burzuchius (talk) 09:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Latest changes to Cyrillic alphabets

Sorry, the latest edits with the addition of “Cyrillic letters”? Obviously, similar articles are full of frankly rubbish edits. I personally am not good at this and cannot cross-check them all. Modun (talk) 06:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
Because I highly appreciate your work, and think that you don't have enough barnstars. :) Double sharp (talk) 03:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Double sharp, thank you very much for the barnstar! Burzuchius (talk) 10:09, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome!
BTW, where can I find the 2024 revisions of the German orthographic rules that deprecated Zäsium? (I'm still too used to spellings like Kadmium indeed.) Double sharp (talk) 17:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Double sharp: Here you can see the current edition and former editions. In the part "Wörterverzeichnis" under the letter C, the former editions stated "Caesium, Cäsium, Zäsium", but the current edition states just "Caesium, Cäsium". Burzuchius (talk) 17:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!! Double sharp (talk) 17:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]