This is an archive of past discussions with User:Bunnypranav. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Orphaned non-free image File:Suchitra Academy Hyderabad Logo.svg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Suchitra Academy Hyderabad Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thanks for the information, I am actually drafting the article in which the image should be used for. I didn't understand how to mention that in the image, so I put it under the rationale of fair use for article. I would be grateful if you could tell me how to include that in the image, or what else I can do to make it not speedy deletable. Bunnypranav (talk) 04:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for correcting my mistake, I believe that the page is violating some other criteria, as we can see that the content is just some copy pasted stuff from a book or something. It looks like the creator has used the page like a web hosting platform. Anyways some other user has placed G11 CSD on the page. Thanks for the correction! Bunnypranav (talk) 14:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Your comment requesting a reliable source to remove WP:NOTNEWS/WP:UNDUE entry that doesn't have consensus is not grounded in policy practice. The political entry was made in the last week to an article on a chemical compound. It should be removed pending talk page consensus. ConstantPlancks (talk) 17:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
I understand that I may have given the wrong reason for the denial of that request, but please make sure not to delete other editor's comments on a talk page. Feel free to make the edit request as unanswered and post your reason for not accepting any request.
Also, about the edit itself, based on this section, it clearly states that there is difference of opinion on the issue. User Dmarquard and Drsruli have updated the section to more reflect the actual proven sources, add appropriate sections, and also removed the unsourced material. I also agree with his comment It's encyclopedic and merits inclusion, but the article could use restructuring. I believe the agreed upon restructuring has been done, the current version agrees with your request of It's enough to link to this article from the pager attack article.
"Extended Confirmed" restrictions were implemented after a new editor edit warred to keep the material in that article. That editor was blocked. The request was to restore the article prior to that disruption and remove the event they insisted should be implemented. It's odd that you believe you are implementing the talk page section that I started in response to the blocked editors addition. Your first comment and most recent comment lead me to believe you are not fully understanding the issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConstantPlancks (talk • contribs) 02:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
@ConstantPlancks Thanks for the explanation. If I am not wrong, the user(s) would have been blocked due to editing warring, not adding the content. So, if the content agrees with Wikipedia policies, then it need not be removed just because the editor(s) was blocked.
Also, as you said, I have not fully understood the complete issue in this case, so I would like to back out of the discussion, due to my limited knowledge of the scenario. Sorry for any inconvenience caused. Please feel free to open another edit request if you still have any requests, and I will not interfere in the issue.
Hi, Bunnypranav, Your comment on your changes to the Itaakpa rock shelter article says that you did: Typo fixing, that the reference list was missing and that you did general fixes. I looked at the preceding version of the article and the reference list was there. Also I don’t see any trace in the archive of typo correction or general fixes. What’s going on? Dr Dobeaucoup (talk) 16:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
The regional of trailing spaces and simplifying the link were the general fixes. You added a hearing for References, but forgot to add the {{ Reflist }} template, see Wikipedia:Citing sources. I added that in my semi-automated WP:AWB edit.
Hi Bunnypranav. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Fastily11:06, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
If a bot has posted a message on my talk page about a edit, or a archival notice, and the issue is fixed from my end, can I rollback that edit posting a msg on my talk page? ~/Bunnypranav:<ping>04:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
I've seen a lot of your help across Wikipedia, but especially at WP:AFC/R - just wanted to pop in and say thanks so much :-). Keep it up! Cheers. LR.127 (talk) 14:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Sir Bunnypranav, all significant and non-secondary sources have been adopted and used, please indicate which sources do not satisfy you. Thank you
Bozza Gaetano MInale 82.55.176.158 (talk) 11:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
All of the sources mentioned are primary and self-published sources. They also include biographical accounts which are not reliable per Wikipedia policies. See the links in my declining message at your talk page. Also, there has not been a single source added since the previous decline.
If I am not wrong and your name is Bozza Gaetano MInale according to your signature, that constitutes WP:AUTOBIO which is refrained from.
well thanks for everything, I think I won't bother you anymore, just one thing but have you really read what was written and reported in the draft reported? they are real news of 50 years of artistic activity and not biogra
Bunny , Thank you for the suggestion but if I was familiar with computer systems etc. I didn't turn to ask experts for help, at 86 years old the new information technology doesn't entice me, in fact all my artistic activity is entirely on paper, archived in binders and documents my entire artistic life. This is difficult to prove even if I reported all the dates, locations etc. in the draft. to be in line with what Wikipedia says but which unfortunately isn't right for you yet, that's why I ask for help from an expert... 82.55.176.158 (talk) 15:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
