User talk:Builder8360

Welcome

Hello, Builder8360, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 09:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Builder8360, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Builder8360! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Megalodon at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 06:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chirosia inspinata has been accepted

Chirosia inspinata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 18:51, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sphenomorphus maindroni has been accepted

Sphenomorphus maindroni, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kees08 (Talk) 04:49, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Botanophila vallaris has been accepted

Botanophila vallaris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 07:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neagu Mihai has been accepted

Neagu Mihai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 21:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undated AFC submissions

Hi Builder8360, please use the Subst:submit template instead of the AFC submission template itself. Using the AFC submission template when a draft is ready does not date it. Instead, use the Subst:submit template to date your submissions. Thank you. 68.191.37.27 (talk) 22:34, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phytobia optabilis has been accepted

Phytobia optabilis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 23:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Calliphora uralensis has been accepted

Calliphora uralensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KGirl (Wanna chat?) 18:39, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anopheles barianensis has been accepted

Anopheles barianensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KGirl (Wanna chat?) 18:40, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liriomyza flaveola has been accepted

Liriomyza flaveola, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KGirl (Wanna chat?) 18:41, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pardosa Iudia has been accepted

Pardosa Iudia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

joe deckertalk 18:56, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clubiona silvestris has been accepted

Clubiona silvestris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

joe deckertalk 19:10, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bengalia fernandiella has been accepted

Bengalia fernandiella, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 19:49, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Helina baoshanensis has been accepted

Helina baoshanensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 04:28, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alstroemeria discolor has been accepted

Alstroemeria discolor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 00:40, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Yearly earthquake articles

Hello. Thank you for your recent contributions to wikipedia. I hope through time you will enjoy the work that you are doing.

If you look at the yearly earthquake articles ie List of earthquakes in 1975 or more recently list of earthquakes in 2017 you will notice a template. I am making you aware because in the short term I will be finishing off the article you created for 1977. I dont want you to think your work is being discarded. You can help edit and create the yearly lists but just watch that you are keeping to the template for the sake of consistency. When I started creating the articles from 1900 onwards it was more of a list format but from this year the other editors decided that a table format would be better. Im going to go back to the earlier years and start converting them.

Thanks again for your help and good luck with your editing. Matt EK 87 14:12, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magnolia changhungtana has been accepted

Magnolia changhungtana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KGirl (Wanna chat?) 19:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of requests at AFC/R

Hi, I've reverted your deletion of requests at WP:AFC/R because it's not spam, and no reason provided for deletion. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 19:17, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heteropoda sumatrana has been accepted

Heteropoda sumatrana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ToThAc (talk) 17:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iapa River (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Narutolovehinata5 was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Iapa River instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:08, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Teahouse question

You asked about a month ago and never got a response. You said an article was translated using Yandex, and I don't believe it is recommended that you do this, but if you are careful to look at the wording and fix anything that looks strange, it might work.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:40, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drosophila sulfurigaster has been accepted

Drosophila sulfurigaster, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Drosophila sulfurigaster

I am of the opinion, having seen several of your edits, that English is not your first language? You have failed to heed advice on this subject previously. Even your edit summary at the page is ungrammatical.

If making a statement about something, you cannot start a sentence with 'was' unless it is a question. E.g. 'Was it a blue car?' You cannot say 'I saw a car' then say in a new sentence or phrase 'was a blue car'. You have to say 'It was a blue car'. In the same way you need an article in front of the genus name. The Drosophila genus. Wikilink flies redirects to Fly. I expect another editor will correct it again for you, and when they do, please do not change it back as this could be edit warring which might land you in difficulty. Eagleash (talk) 13:55, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Indeed but you corrected and bad one "specie of flies" you want be heared as "species of fly"? how even this sound correct? Builder8360 (talk) 18:49, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is only referring to one species; and again, species is the same whether singular or plural, as has been pointed out to you previously by other editors also. Please remember to sign your posts. Eagleash (talk) 08:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I note another editor has corrected it for you. Eagleash (talk) 08:25, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for announcing. Builder8360 (talk) 18:49, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dysdera castillonensis has been accepted

Dysdera castillonensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

joe deckertalk 23:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, congrats! For little tables of information about the kingdom, phylum, order... on speciies, please use an appropriate infobox. I've updated the article with an example, you can learn more about that particulate template at Template:Taxobox, and let me know if I can answer any questions. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! --joe deckertalk 23:53, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you, Builder8360 (talk) 04:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greenwayodendron oliveri has been accepted

Greenwayodendron oliveri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:06, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greenwayodendron has been accepted

Greenwayodendron, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Greenwayodendron suaveolens has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Greenwayodendron suaveolens. Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 18:34, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Alstroemeria pygmaea) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Alstroemeria pygmaea, Builder8360!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've improved the structure of this stub and added a little extra content. Could you please tidy up the references which are a bit messy at present?

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 21:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, sir Builder8360 (talk) 12:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pardosa pullata has been accepted

Pardosa pullata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greenwayodendron suaveolens has been accepted

Greenwayodendron suaveolens, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:57, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Greenwayodendron suaveolens) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Greenwayodendron suaveolens, Builder8360!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

When you create an article on a species, please put a little more effort in to find a reliable source that give distribution information. It's not hard to do - just Google the name or look at the IUCN Red List site. I've done this for you here, but I'd like to see you doing this yourself in future articles, please.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 07:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Sphenomorphus annectens) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Sphenomorphus annectens, Builder8360!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Most of your citations are misformatted or do not exist. Were you intending to link to individual pages of synonymous species?

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 01:57, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Stylidium exappendiculatum) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Stylidium exappendiculatum, Builder8360!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please use a simple {{Taxobox}} template, or {{automatic Taxobox}}, rather than copying the raw "guts" of the template itself: see Stylidium laricifolium for an example.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 15:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling to me. Builder8360 (talk) 20:34, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Translations

If you are translating an article from another Wikipedia, please translate it into correct English rather than using Google Translate or similar. The article Stylidium exappendiculatum needed several tweaks to make it read as real English. Thanks. PamD 20:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Builder8360. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for let me know --Builder8360 (talk) 11:37, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your English

Hello, thanks for creating new articles on a range of taxa. Can I please ask you in future to be a little more careful in checking your English before publishing your translations, and also to add some basic distributional information wherever possible? There's no need to use phrases such as "according to the Catalogue of Life, there are no known subspecies" Users don't need to know about the non-existence of vars. and sspp. - tell them what is known instead. Keep up the good work! Nick Moyes (talk) 00:57, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, when I translate, I translate the whole thing, thanks for let me know --Builder8360 (talk) 17:27, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Stylidium squamosotuberosum) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Stylidium squamosotuberosum, Builder8360!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add distribution information, if possible.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 01:07, 16 December 2017

Sure! Builder8360 (talk) 17:26, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of coats and flags of Romania's counties concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of coats and flags of Romania's counties, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Faculty of Politic Sciences from Cluj concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Faculty of Politic Sciences from Cluj, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Spencer (author) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Spencer (author), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sebastian de Rozgony concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sebastian de Rozgony, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alexa Maria Surholt concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Alexa Maria Surholt, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Iapa River concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Iapa River, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Spencer (author)

Hello, Builder8360. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spencer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Faculty of Politic Sciences from Cluj concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Faculty of Politic Sciences from Cluj, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sebastian de Rozgony

Hello, Builder8360. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sebastian de Rozgony".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Faculty of Politic Sciences from Cluj

Hello, Builder8360. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Faculty of Politic Sciences from Cluj".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:25, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Burhanivka, Sînelnîkove concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Burhanivka, Sînelnîkove, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alexa Maria Surholt

Hello, Builder8360. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alexa Maria Surholt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Iapa River

Hello, . It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Draft:Iapa River".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Eagleash (talk) 01:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Burhanivka, Sînelnîkove

Hello, Builder8360. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Burhanivka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Anatol Jacotă concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Anatol Jacotă, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anatol Jacotă

Hello, Builder8360. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anatol Jacotă".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:00, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Builder8360. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]