hey andrevan I was born in Sedro Woolley 33 years ago nd recently moved back Hals is as big a cultural atraction here as the loggerodeo or as dicks in seattle can you please put it back Brycelpro89 (talk) 02:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry you feel that way but if you check the sources or type in google New Mexico Civil Gaurd you will see this is a very large militia group operating in New Mexico with more media attention then most of the groups cited in there and it behooves the public to know about these people as they have been running around for yers there and on the news almost monthly Brycelpro89 (talk) 14:41, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am new to wikepedia and trying to add something that seems over looked by the editor of that page if you would like more links let me send them to you now
hello dr kay what exactly is personal analysis? I am new to this and wanted to add the confederted empire principality of the northern forrests and commonwealth of Dracul as all these nations are quite notable in the micronational community and they are not even mentioned they have all gained lands buisnesses and currenxcies and governments and are making huge strides twords independence and all that is on the page is mostly nations from 20 to 30 years ago. Brycelpro89 (talk) 14:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
also im sure the older people who madethe first encyclopedia were upset when their articles got added to but things change and powers rise and fall should I add a section that says modern active micronations? Brycelpro89 (talk) 15:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ok I thought that was another part of wikipedia, ill do some more reserch. Do you think adding a section called current micronations would be a good one. Because some of these places are actively seeking independence nd the notion has kind of moved from the internet realm of the early 2000s to a more concrete we want independence stance of these groups? Brycelpro89 (talk) 15:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
here is another sourse do you believe this will work. I am going to put the article back up and site this and see if I can find some on the others I mentioned.
Hello, Brycelpro89. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. It seems you may have a conflict of interest with the New Mexico Civil Guard. What is your connection to that group?Netherzone (talk) 19:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was at a couple protests they showed up at and am currently documenting militias and other things, im working on a book about micronations and one on the rise of militias during 2020. Subjects not many are covering but that are very pertinent today Brycelpro89 (talk) 21:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Mexico Civil Guard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Brycelpro89!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Signed,Pichemist( Contribs | Talk )18:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pbritti were:
While I am fairly certain that this topic clears the general notability guidelines, there are tonal issues that incline me towards declining this submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Mexico Civil Guard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Can you please help me by identifying sentences not in the correct tone because I was trying to do objective reporting taking neither side 174.214.16.173 (talk) 19:10, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A belated welcome!
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Brycelpro89! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tutwakhamoe were:
The two cited sources at the very bottom need to be removed as they are duplicate of some of the previous inline citations. The overall tone is still very subjective, with problematic phrases like "national infamy" and excessively long run-on sentences. Although not grammatically incorrect, having most sentences starts with "they" seems a weird writing choice. Some of the contents, such as "They were sued by the state of New Mexico" and "The group was recently ruled against in the New Mexico Supreme court after lengthy court battle where even facebook was subpeonad", need more clarifications.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Mexico Civil Guard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
