User talk:Brianjd/Archive 4
Fair use image removed from user spaceHi - I've removed a fair use image from this page in your userspace, as per criterion 9 of the non-free content policy, fair use images are not allowed to be used in userspace. Cheers, -Panser Born- (talk) 19:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC) Wikimania 2008Hey! I'm contacting all the members of wikiproject Perth because, I have put in an incomplete bid for Perth to hold Wikimania 2008. Please show your support by adding your name to the list and help contribute by improving our bid which is incomplete and located here - thanks Talk to symode09's or How's my driving? 17:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Idiot codeA proposed deletion template has been added to the article Idiot code, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
Merge idiot code?You placed merge tags, but no discussion. Since I couldn't imagine what you had in mind, there being nothing there to merge, I took out the tags. Dicklyon (talk) 07:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Singapore AirlinesI have been editing airline articles in Wikipedia for some time now, and my edits are according to the Wikiproject style. This style of course doesn't have to be used, but when looking at airlines such as American Airlines, Northwest Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Continental Airlines, United Airlines, etc, you will notice not only myself, but other editors have helped me implement a consistent style. Once again, it is soley my opinion on how the airline articles should be layed out. Most Star Alliance airline articles do have the style I utilize, as I have edited many of them some time before. All SkyTeam articles also have this style as well. That is why I try not to edit international airlines too often because the way I edit them is usually not the way many people want them. But, as I have discussed with many editors of this article, it needs serious attention. My edits were reasonable, but I understand that I dont necassarily describe them as much as I should. I really think the edits I made were well overdue.--Golich17 00:30, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
|