User talk:Brad Thomas Hanks

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Brad Thomas Hanks! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I am happy to be the first person to welcome you to English Wikipedia! I have prepared this welcome message to help you with your continued adventure here, check out the links below or just visit the new contributors' help page! Happy Editing! Chris Troutman (talk) 02:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started: Tutorials and Training Click on "show" to the right to expand We have some interactive tutorials and trainings you may want to try: Wikipedia Tutorial Wikipedia Training The Wikipedia Adventure game And some regular articles you can just read: How to edit a page How to start a new article How to upload an image and add it to an article Be bold in editing Frequently Asked Questions Getting Help: How and Where to Ask a Question? Click on "show" to the right to expand There are numerous ways you can ask for help. You can ask me on my talk page. You can copy and place {{helpme}} with your accompanying question on the bottom of your talk page and someone else will show up shortly to answer your questions here. You can try one of the specialized fora listed at the "Where to ask a question" page. If you prefer live chat, try #wikipedia-en-help IRC chat room. Click here to get connected through your browser! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date On a final note, you may want to try the new (beta) VisualEditor, check out our monthly newspaper, the Wikipedia Signpost, and join a WikiProject of interest to you. WikiProjects gather editors interested in certain topic areas, providing them with information, tools and a place to discuss the topic in question. . For a list of all WikiProjects, see here. Joining a WikiProject makes the Wikipedia experience much richer! Chris Troutman (talk) 02:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Thomas Hanks, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Brad Thomas Hanks! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Hello, I'm Ahunt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Quadcopter have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. - Ahunt (talk) 11:47, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ahunt. There's no examples of a photo taken by a drone. This is a picture that I took 4 years ago. After reviewing content guidelines, I believe this addition enriched the article and doesn't violate any policies.

Thoughts?

Brad Thomas Hanks (talk) 05:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I noted on my talk page: regarding this, no, it added nothing to the article and had your name as a credit all over it, which is why I removed it. If you think it needs top be included then please make a case on the article talk page and see if other editors support including it. - Ahunt (talk) 14:26, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. That is how I had uploaded it originally from my computer. Brad Thomas Hanks (talk) 06:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Grabilla

added a link pointing to PNG

ShareX

added a link pointing to PNG

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Comparison of screencasting software into Comparison of screenshot software. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 16:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know about attribution from within Wikipedia. I'll do that. Brad Thomas Hanks (talk) 18:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comparison of screenshot software for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of screenshot software is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of screenshot software until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Govvy (talk) 09:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CloudApp logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CloudApp logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CloudApp screenshot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CloudApp screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CoPilot (company)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Brad Thomas Hanks (talk) 02:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about CoPilot (company)

Hello, Brad Thomas Hanks, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Pppery, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, CoPilot (company), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoPilot (company).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pppery}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:21, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pppery:I saw that there were 2000 in the backlog so I thought I would just publish it. On an unrelated note, I had two questions: 1) I used to know where older rejected and inactive drafts were that needed to be tagged for deletion but I can't find where that is. 2) I noticed that Scott Horsley has a page but Sara O'Brien (CNBC) and Chris Isidore (CNN) don't have pages even though they are also senior staff at very well-known media organizations. I feel like they are at the same level of notability as Scott Horsley. Where would I check to see if they already had had pages created that were deleted? Thanks! Brad Thomas Hanks (talk) 02:34, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't seem to have gotten that ping, but I'll answer anyway. For the first question, you don't generally need to worry about manually tagging inactive drafts anymore since other people are handling deleting them. For the second question, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not generally valid in this context, but anyway I can find no record of any previous attempts to write articles on either of those people. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm a huge dork, so I apologize in advance for inflicting my deletion reply on you. But thinking through it was actually interesting bc I might have arrived at an useful insight about coverage significance. Let me know what you think . Brad Thomas Hanks (talk) 04:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]