Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply.
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
I don't really see the purpose of posting this on my talk page. If you want to discuss Corn Dogs, there are already posts on your talk page, or you could post on the article's talk page. br100x(talk)04:41, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
We are way past the corn dog article now. If i would post a universal cure for cancer you would delete it instantly. You are a danger for humanity. You'd rather have order than truth. 174.89.214.57 (talk) 05:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I do not have anything against you, nor do I want to undo any of your edits. I would love it if you posted edits, just in this particular instance, I didn't believe the article needed that to improve clarity. I would love to see you continue to edit productively and make Wikipedia a better place. Also, thanks for using the proper formatting. br100x(talk)06:01, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I got this site wrong i just read about the no original research (no cancer cure even if it works unless you have massive proof). I read the others rules also and i dont think i could do a positive edit. The only thing i could do is by being pedantic and blocking every new edit. Its almost impossible to do a contribution (leeching) without breaking one or more rules. 174.89.214.57 (talk) 08:08, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry to hear that, but as you probably know, Wikipedia is widely regarded as a reliable source for information. Those rules are in place to protect from potentially incorrect and misleading material, which would cause Wikipedia to lose some of its reliability. However, there are many other things you could do to help Wikipedia, such as fixing grammar mistakes, rewording hard-to-understand sentences, or adding images. Many pages are tagged for poor grammar or spelling, which puts them in a category so people can find and fix them. By fixing grammar and the like, you may get more of a feel for Wikipedia's policies and why they are in place. :) br100x(talk)22:23, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
New Page Patrol
Hi. Thank you for your edits. I appreciate you wanting to jump right in and patrol pages but with only just over 100 edits to mainspace, you almost certainly do not have enough experience yet to be patrolling new pages. Please read WP:NPP and WP:Deletion and if you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:26, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kudpung, thanks for letting me know. I was poking around in the counter-vandalism guides when I stumbled upon the WP:NPP page. I saw how much backlog there was and thought I could help out. I read through WP:NPP and WP:Deletion, but I realize now that patrolling new pages requires a deeper knowledge of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies, which I have still to acquire. I guess I'll just stick to recent change patrolling for now. About how many edits would you suggest I have before venturing back into new page patrolling? br100x(talk)03:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Generally , after reading the pages I linked to, at least 500 non automated edits to mainspace that should include significant recent changes patrolling and and counter vandalism with reports to WP:AIV. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:42, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at California Wing Civil Air Patrol instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Br100x/California Wing Civil Air Patrol, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
Thanks for uploading File:DIXON logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
