en User talk:Bob K31416 Archive 2011

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Bob K31416. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 2005

←

Archive 2009

→

Please see

Please see my response at my talk page. Thanks, --Funandtrvl (talk) 21:56, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Here you go

...

— Preceding unsigned comment added by LeadSongDog (talk • contribs) 17:39, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Regards, Bob K31416 (talk) 18:42, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello. You have a new message at User_talk:SMasters#Random_survey's talk page.

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bob K31416 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Black Kite (t) (c) 15:34, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Apologies for this. I was alerted to a situation by another user (which you can see in the SPI case) which turned out to be a series of coincidences. Thanks, Black Kite (t) (c) 22:51, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for getting that straight. Regards, Bob K31416 (talk) 06:58, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

re: blueboar's compromise proposal

Hi,

I wonder if you would reconsider your vote at

Wikipedia:V/First#Poll_V_FC_P_13_Blueboar.27s_compromise_-_move_discussion_of_truth.2Funtruth_out_of_lede_and_into_new_section

I understand you to say that you think the change is too big to have a chance to gain consensus, but right now the vote is running 7-2 in favor. What is to be gained by being opposed to change here? Thanks, Unscintillating (talk) 00:11, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

WP:V

Hi! I was just referring to the frequent mention of such concerns on that same talk page.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 11:22, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

how to do that

Hi there. If you post something to a talk page and then want to take it back or change it somehow, you can easily do so, without mistakenly misleading readers, by using strikeouts: <s>here's the text you don't like anymore</s>. The outcome is this: ~~here's the text you don't like anymore~~, allowing folks to read it still, but showing that you no longer mean to say that. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

My revert earlier

Sorry about reverting and running -- I was about to come over to your talkpage and let you know when my ride honked outside.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:45, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for coming over to explain. No problem. --Bob K31416 (talk) 02:49, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Speed of Light

[My following message was copied by Excirial from User Talk:Excirial and pasted here. --Bob K31416 (talk) 20:03, 29 November 2011 (UTC)] Hi. There was technical problem with your revert.[1] Although the before and after columns of the diff seemed to look OK, the actual page didn't. Some kind of glitch. Could you take a look? Thanks. --Bob K31416 (talk) 19:29, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

I think the page just needed a good old WP:PURGE to set it right. The template seemed ok, so i just copy-and-pasted the infobox from an older edition to it and saved it. As you can see, no new revision was created (As the pages are identical), but the infobox fixed itself. Of course, someone could also have been playing with the infobox template. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:49, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Apparently your fix also changed the way the article appeared in the diff display linked in my previous message. Anyhow, it all looks fine now. : ) --Bob K31416 (talk) 21:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposal at WP:V

Hope it was alright? That I added the two versions to your proposal, just seems clearer to me. Regards. Crazynas^t 18:36, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Bob K31416/Archive 2011