This is an archive of past discussions with User:Beccaynr. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
September 2023 at Women In Red
Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283
Hiya - and thank you! In turn, I have long meant to tell you I admire the intelligence, research and diligence you put into AfD discussions and rescuing articles - often frustrating my own evil intent to delete, but appreciated nevertheless! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Alexandermcnabb, such praise is much appreciated from a most worthy adversary! And I regret my capacity for typing is limited over the next few days while I recuperate from a tendon injury, because I otherwise have more to say about the letters and spirits of the lawencyclopedia :) Beccaynr (talk) 16:28, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2023
Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286
When creating an article, check to see if there is an entry in the sister project Wikidata. If your subject is listed, the Wikidata information can be useful
Fortunately the template is a generally helpful 'please mop here' type of request, and thank you for your mopping as well! Beccaynr (talk) 17:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - November 2023
Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
Which part of WP:DOB did the inclusion of Paula Richman's DOB run afoul of? Was it the lack of citation (which I can add from the source listed in wikidata) or concerns about privacy (in which case I'll leave it be)? Plandu (talk) 15:58, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi Plandu, thank you for following up - yes, the lack of a citation was part of the reason - I also think for this subject, it would be better to only include the year of birth if we have a reliable source. I removed the date of birth quickly because of the lack of a source and the privacy concerns outlined in the policy. Please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns, and also thank you for adding the infobox. Beccaynr (talk) 16:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Regarding this edit where is the WP:OR?
The source clearly says: "Divya Dwivedi says studies prove Mahatma Gandhi was one of the leaders who constructed the idea of ‘false Hindu majority’ in India." And also "she questioned the origins of Hinduism and stated that Mahatma Gandhi helped construct the idea".
Hi IP 2402, content issues would be best discussed on the talk page of the article, and I think the WP:SYNTH part of the WP:OR policy applies to your addition. Also, Divya Dwivedi is protected by WP:BLP policy. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 08:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
No its not WP:SYNTH when the content is supported by the source.
There have been ongoing issues with this article, and we can further discuss how your source does not appear to support the 'controversial' content you attempted to add to this biography of a living person, at the talk page of the article. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 09:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
There is nothing 'controversial' about this content.
Her own written article: "Gandhi had an important role in the invention of “Hindu” religion. He understood that if the majority of the population, the lower castes, were not let into the upper-caste temples, a common religion called Hindu would not be legally recognised."[1] Click here for full preview.
This is completely in line with the article I linked above.[2]
Hey there, thanks fo yorur contributions to Wikipedia. I appreciate your work on biographies of women writers, for instance. I hope you like pictures of goats.... because here you go. TX!
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
.jpg)
