|
User talk:Beagel/archive2010Archives... 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 ITN for Central Asia – China gas pipeline
--BorgQueen (talk) 15:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC) Can you please checkI am new at this but I decided to try and update the Portal:Energy/Energy news page. Can you please check because I think you have updated this section in the past —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.22.92 (talk) 16:40, 14 December 2009 (UTC) Seasons GreetingsIt's that time of year again, and I wanted to wish you all the best for the festive season... Johnfos (talk) 18:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC)  Linksmų Kalėdų ir laimingų Naujųjų Metų! Thanks for your energy contributions and your calming influence. You make this project feel worthwhile and sustainable. Novickas (talk) 13:52, 26 December 2009 (UTC) please advise me if you revert RjwilmsiBotHi, with reference to this revert, I apologise for my bot's error and am happy for you to revert such edits, but please do let me know so that I can prevent it happening again. Thanks Rjwilmsi 19:26, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
your query about date templateAt Rich Farmbrough's page, you asked about the date template. It doesn't actually format dates, does it, except for something to do with ISO dates. Is that why you are interested in using it? Tony (talk) 12:06, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
ITN for Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant
--BorgQueen (talk) 06:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC) Re: Hard space You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Curious why you took out the categories for this page. I would think coverage of SPRs for each country would fall under a basic category of "Energy for [Blank]". Publicus 18:50, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Power Station articleHello Beagel. I just edited the "Typical power output" section in the Power Station article. This section had the "This section requires expansion" tag. My first "major" edit and first time I have had to add a new reference to an existing article etc. If you have time, maybe take a look and make sure I have not done anything egregious. Any advice welcome. I made a bit of a mess of the edit to the discussion page there because I added my summary into the wrong section initially. Not sure if its considered taboo to delete material from discussion, but I did, so I could put it back in the right place. Thx. Turbine1 (talk) 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Taner Yıldız. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Re:Shale oil extraction FACI havent gone thru the article yet as My PC is not booting since past 3-4 days and seems like it might take some time.. I cant guarantee this as my PC is not working and only when it gets OK, i'll go thru the article...However I have that article on my watchlist and would try to keep an eye on it....All the best for FAC !!! Gprince007 (talk) 15:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Australian wind farms
Unreferenced BLPs
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 15:51, 17 January 2010 (UTC) Oil Refineries Portal in CanadaHi Beagel, i suggest for you to work with me for to create a real oil refinery portal with some a good articles like the Montreal Refinery or the Montreal East Refinery. To create a menu on the lower part of the article all refineries in Canada. To help me to search a picture for any refinery. Please, don't remove anything inside the oil refinery in Montreal, all articles in the Montreal Oil Refining center are in construction. THANKS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.21.233.169 (talk) 14:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC) Montreal Oil Refining CenterGiven you have commented on the subject. I would welcome any comments or suggestion you could offer regarding a move request for Montreal Oil Refining Center. See: Talk:Montreal_Oil_Refining_Center.--Labattblueboy (talk) 23:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Gladstone LNG A tag has been placed on Gladstone LNG, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding I had moved Gladstone LNG to GLNG, and then I saw the move request discussion at the above location. When I first tried to look at the article's talk page, I got an error - which I assumed was because the page did not exist (I've been getting some errors like this from Wikipedia pages recently, I think it's a WMF server issue) It wasn't until afterwards that I saw the conversation. I have explained my rationale on the talk page, and I hope that you are OK with it - I did not mean to ignore your contribution to the discussion, and if the error had not occurred, I would have left a similar message as part of the discussion and see what people thought, rather than just going ahead and performing the move! I thought that I should apologise to you for what might appear to be rudeness, which was in fact a simple mistake on my part - I'm sorry. Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 08:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC) GeoGroupTemplateHi Beagel. With regard to this edit, it is also said that it can be placed on top ("...or inside a section with a list or table of features...", here). I wouldnt really mind keeping it the way it is, but the new section is empty except for the template, making it look a little odd. I will now put the template back up. But of course, feel free to revert if its still a wrong move. Kind regards. Rehman(+) 13:23, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Estonian journals categoryHi, as most academic journals nowadays are mainly international and journals that clearly can be assigned to one nationality are becoming the excezption rather than the rule, we are retiring the "journals by country" categories. If you have a look at Category:Journals by country, you'll see that I have now emptied almost all of these categories (haven't had time for the British journals yet) so that they can be deleted. Hope this explains. --Crusio (talk) 19:32, 9 February 2010 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Energinet.dkA tag has been placed on Energinet.dk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
Repeated POV-pushingHi, you seem to be very concerned in a number of oil and gas issues - one can be amazed by the time you actually spend on these issues; while I usually appreciate collaboration with editors who have this kind of concern, I am sorry to realize you are doing POV-pushing on most of the articles you are editing. Why is that ? Are you being paid by an oil company ? What are your motivations ? Rgds--Environnement2100 (talk) 12:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
New msgYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. New infoboxesHello Beagel. You seems to have a fair knowledge on the creation of infoboxes. Could you have a peek on my proposal here? Thanks. Kind regards. Rehman(+) 09:30, 13 February 2010 (UTC) Removed PROD on List of megaprojectsI have removed the {{prod}} tag from List of megaprojects, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! . I think the list can be improved and come into line with WP list guidelines with a bit of work that I've already started.--Mike Cline (talk) 16:24, 20 February 2010 (UTC) February 2010Hello Beagel! Thank you for helping me on the Safaniya Oil Field article. Keep it up and I'm expecting you to guard that article when I'm busy. CfD nomination of Category:OECD member economiesI have nominated Category:OECD member economies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member economies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:34, 6 March 2010 (UTC) Do not remove sourced informationPlease do not remove sourced information, as you just did on this occasion. You are again in a case of deleting information you do not like.--Environnement2100 (talk) 23:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Disrupting WikipediaYou just removed information for the second time (this diff FTR), in spite of being warned; this info is sourced and pertains to the article. Please stop this behavior, thanks.--Environnement2100 (talk) 18:13, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Inguri DamHello Beagel. I've noticed that you placed a notice on Talk:Inguri Hydro Power Plant (and a relating template on Talk:Inguri Dam) regarding the talkpage history. There seems to be no history in the talkpage. Would you mind if i simply redirect (or delete, since it is a talkpage of a redirect) to Talk:Inguri Dam? Or it could be that i am missing something here... Kind regards. Rehman(+) 09:58, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Trolley CarI am sorry i made a mess with this article Trolley Car but was hoping to make an article like Horsecar but due to lack of time i was unable to finish. Please feel free to do whatever you feel necessary and when i have more time in the future i will create the article properly. (Maybe in the user space next time :P) L blue l (talk) 22:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC) AfD nomination of Aban PearlAn editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Aban Pearl. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aban Pearl. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 15 May 2010 (UTC) Byford DolphinIt is impolite to remove other projects' banners from article talk pages without asking first, and I've reverted your removal of the {{WPSCUBA}} banner from Talk:Byford Dolphin. If you feel that the article is also within the scope of other projects that you are a member of, then please add then without removing the existing banners or without providing a good reason why they should be removed. --RexxS (talk) 18:31, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
International Centre for Hydrogen Energy TechnologiesHi, I tried to address the lack of citation issue in the page about the International Centre for Hydrogen Energy Technologies (full disclosure: I'm the Information Officer of the said organization). Do you think it would be appropriate to delete the "lack of citation" mention now? Gregory Dziedzic (talk) 08:11, 31 May 2010 (UTC) I fixed the templates color scheme to be in line with WP:Redlinks, and I would like to know your opinion of the change!69.137.120.81 (talk) 22:40, 2 June 2010 (UTC) Q4000Wow! thanks!..cheers mate! --emerson7 08:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC) Tharos / Transocean Marianasthe article should bear the vessel's current name. the particulars can be hashed out in the decidedly cumbersome infoboxes. i'll try my hand at it if you like.--emerson7 16:41, 11 June 2010 (UTC) BP LeasesHi Beagel, The BP people cat and section of the template contains people that no longer work for BP or who are actually dead. I don't think including those people misleads readers since their current employer (or date of death) is in the article once you click on it. Similarly, I think the vessels should stay because:
But, if the consensus goes against me, so be it. I don't see a clear consensus in the template discussion though. The only other editor to comment so far seems to agree with you in one sentence to not include and then disagree by suggesting a separate section in the next. That second part was why I created the BP vessels cat, although nearly all those article were already in the more broad BP cat before I touched them. So basically, I would suggest letting more people weigh in. I know that, like me, you also edit oil company articles when there's not a breaking story. If you want to solicit opinions from the Energy WikiProject, that might bring in some people fmailiar with this type of cat/template.RevelationDirect (talk) 23:59, 12 June 2010 (UTC) Thanks for creating this one! Needed. FT2 (Talk | email) 12:06, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Geopolitical organization / organization infoboxHi, I made a suggestion[1] on when should geopolitical organizations use the infobox template for organizations and when the infobox for geopolitical organizations. Hope you have something to comment! Shubi (talk) 00:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Nord Pool Spot logo.gif Thanks for uploading File:Nord Pool Spot logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Image Screening Bot (talk) 21:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC) Dams in ChinaBeagel, I noticed your category reverts and have a question. In most countries, including the U.S., a dam article usually has a category for it as a dam and if it has a power station, a power station category, like the Hartwell Dam in SC/GA. Some hydroelectric power stations, although rarely, don't have an associated dam like the Sir Adam Beck Hydroelectric Power Stations in Canada. The dam and its power plant are often two separate facilities and I am familiar with the categorizing both. Is there a stated policy that China articles are following and not the majority of other articles I have worked on? --NortyNort (talk) 19:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
I see this discussion is still here. I was just in Category:Dams in China and it is mostly filled with hydroelectric power station sub-cats. Out of the roughly 30 articles in the sub-cats, only two have "power station" in their name. To put the rest of the articles with "Dam" in their name within those categories makes no sense. As pointed above, if a reader is looking for dams, they may not look in the hydroelectric power station cats. The way it is now defeats the purpose of having categories for easy navigation. I think articles with "power station" in their name that are hydroelectric belong in those categories. If the article has "dam" in its name and has a hydroelectric power station, then it still belongs in the Dams category. To properly categorize both, we may be forced with some sort of redundancy, i.e. placing each dam in both categories. One of the many examples in Canada is the Jordan River Dam which is in both categories. I think the redundancy is justified because you have an article that covers two structures.--NortyNort (Holla) 09:49, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Resources in NorwegianHi Beagel. For your information, there are now some lists of power plants in the Norwegian Wikipedia. The lists contain some 5.000 power plants. Even though the lists are in norwegian language, I presume it might be of great interest to you and other uers as a reference guide to find and describe power plants. The lists are:
All in all, we have articles on approx. 2.700 international power stations, and some 2.000 Norwegian ones. Kind regards, Bjoertvedt (talk) 15:59, 3 July 2010 (UTC) BP etcThanks for the note and prompt action which has enabled me to fix this with minimal problems. Rich Farmbrough, 16:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC). VIASPACEHi, thank you for helping to revise and edit the VIASPACE article. I would like to let you know that I disagree with your removal of "DMFC cartridges onboard aircraft" as this has everything to do with VIASPACE. Regards CleanFuture (talk) 03:10, 7 July 2010 (UTC) Shafag-AsimanYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Hans Jørgen KochFor inclusion in a categroy like Category:International Renewable Energy Agency, the article needs to establish the fact that this is defining for the individual. A mere mention does not merit inclusion in a category. In some discussions, I have seen editors state that if there is a paragraph on the topic then you have established a case of inclusion. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:59, 9 July 2010 (UTC) INOGATEI reinstated these caregories, which are key INOGATE objectives; in fact INOGATE can claim to be a major animator of these in the countrioes where it operates, so I be;leive the categories are clearly justified. Best regards, Smerus (talk) 12:35, 10 July 2010 (UTC) Byford Dolphinmost of the the data in the table, are not really relatable to the infobox. i spent some time on it and the article the other day, but lost all the changes before i managed to save it. i'll give it another go later. cheers! I don't know user:KaiserbleI'm not user:Kaiserble. I am one IP user in wikipedia. I have not wikipedia account. --211.214.239.139 (talk) 10:38, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
False positive reportThe other day you submitted a false positive report because you found yourself unable to edit someone's talk page. If you have not already seen, it was due to an accident in the code of a particular edit filter which was quickly fixed by the MediaWiki software itself. The code has been reverted to the last good version and this should not happen again. Thank you for bringing this to our attention, however; if people hadn't reported it we wouldn't have known there was a problem. I have removed the false positive reports as I felt it was easier to just go to the people who submitted them directly. —Soap— 23:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC) HiHi B, I wonder if you would care to offer an opinion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond Mountain University and Talk:Photovoltaic array#Merge?. Thanks. Johnfos (talk) 20:55, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
CfD closesJust a comment since you don't do closes. Some of the closers want to see more then one opinion before they close a discussion. I try to look at ones on the last day to see if I can offer an opinion on the topic if no one else has. Sometimes I can't for various reasons. It would be nice if one or two others could also look these over and offer an opinion, even if it does not agree with what was proposed. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:59, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Hydroelectric Power Station Cats in Wikimedia CommonsBeagel, I know you are a energy-category guru and thought you might want to join a discussion here in the Commons. Thanks.--NortyNort (Holla) 07:48, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Dropping Categories in Electric CarHi. Why did you drop the categories in the Electric Car article? The categories you dropped seemed entirely appropriate. Please respond on the article's talk page. Ebikeguy (talk) 17:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Volumetric Production Payment - VPP listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Volumetric Production Payment - VPP. Since you had some involvement with the Volumetric Production Payment - VPP redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). SnottyWong soliloquize 22:44, 5 August 2010 (UTC) Deleting Mac's redirectsHi. Bridgeplayer's oppose !vote at the Rf
Opinion on page scopeHello Beagel, would you care to have an opinion on Talk:List_of_offshore_wind_farms#Proposal_for_a_revised_article_scope ? Talk is also at Talk:List_of_offshore_wind_farms#Additional_operational_offshore_windfarms. Only a few users have voiced opinions, so consensus is thin. TGCP (talk) 08:45, 11 August 2010 (UTC) Template:Infobox power stationYea, I just restored an old version. Left a note since the edit history and merge still need fixing. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:54, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Category:Solar energy companiesYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. ReOk and thanks! Cheers. BineMai 17:33, 25 August 2010 (UTC) Power stations in IndiaMr Beagel, Thanks for reverting the catagory. i agree that u droped the catagory coal fired power plant in the page list of power stations in india. I understand the reason. but what is the need to drop the same catagory in each and every individual power plant? .for example if some body wants to know the list of power plants in india while visiting the rajghat power station, what they will do? please justify. Amarnath aravabhoomi (talk) 18:54, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Amarnath aravabhoomi (talk) 15:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Sinan disambiguationHi, I notice that you just reinstated an old disambiguation page for Sinan, replacing an improved version. Could I ask why? SamuelTheGhost (talk) 10:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
MergerHi Beagel. I have changed my mind about the merger, please share your views here. Thanks! Rehman(+) 13:47, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Infobox oil refineryI too noticed that the documentation is out of sync with the actual template. Let me know if you want any help fixing this issue. For example, do we want to support both lat/lon and coordinates, or, say go with the formats supported by templates like {{Infobox building}}? Also, it looks like the map feature is completely broken, since {{Infobox}} doesn't have an image3 option. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:11, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Hi Beagel. You might be interested in this. Kind regards. Rehman(+) 02:59, 15 October 2010 (UTC) Looking to get your insight'Afternoon, Beagel, having come across your contributions to a range of Wikiproject Energy articles, I was hoping that you may be able to weigh in on a revision I've proposed here(on the article's talk page) to the opening paragraph of this article's Members and history section. Being one of the less-frequented articles, this post has not received any response as of yet. In the interest of obtaining adequate consensus before moving forward, might you be able to take a peek and add your two cents? Cheers, Carthan (talk) 17:28, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Turbine manufacturer
Hi, Beagel. There is a tiny issue with using What we could do is, as I said before, create new fields for each. That wouldn't be a problem as we are already using subclasses, and we have plenty of more room to add more fields, if necessary. Is it ok if I create separated fields? Rehman 08:58, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Infobox Power Station
Re:Shale oil extractionHi there...The article is pretty stable and good in content...but my busy work schedule in real life has left me with very time to devote for wikipedia editing...But still i will try to keep an eye on FAC and see what i can do...Hope it gets thru the FAC...Byee and all the best...!! Gprince007 (talk) 04:21, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Shale oil extraction FACI'm out of the house for a few hours, but will return to the article tonight or tomorrow. One thing I wondered about but haven't looked at in enough detail to comment on: the article is not very long, so could more specific information be added on some of the processes that are only mentioned without being described in detail? E.g. Hom Tov isn't mentioned except in the table. More later -- Mike Christie (talk) 13:48, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
I tried to edit the page Wikipedia:Featured article candidates to indicate that I support making Shale oil extraction a Featured Article, but it seems my edit was not made to this page, but a similar page called Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Shale oil extraction/archive1. Anyway, you can see a few edits I made by looking at the article History, and what few remarks I made on its Talk Page. H Padleckas (talk) 22:40, 4 December 2010 (UTC) Congratulations! And happy holidays. Novickas (talk) 18:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC) Oil-shale power stationsHi Beagel. I noticed you are quite active on the oil shale article, and also brought it up to FA. Just wondering if you could help update this section? Rehman 13:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
UmidHi Beagel, please see a new article on Umid gas field. It's a newly discovered and second largest. See if you can add more information. Thanks! Tuscumbia (talk) 19:41, 6 December 2010 (UTC) Hi Beagel, Congratulations on bringing this informative article up to FA standard... Johnfos (talk) 18:30, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Rice Solar EnergyI won't userfy it, otherwise that defeats the point of G5 deletion (in my view) because the original banned author would then still get credit for the resulting reworked article. However, the one ref on the page was this and the one external link was this. Hope this helps. Regards, BencherliteTalk 09:33, 20 December 2010 (UTC) {{Infobox power station
| name = Rice Solar Energy Project
| official_name =
| image =
| image_size =
| image_caption =
| image_alt =
| location_map = California
| location_map_width =
| location_map_text =
| lat_d =
| lat_m =
| lat_s =
| lat_NS =
| long_d =
| long_m =
| long_s =
| long_EW =
| coordinates_type = type:landmark
| coordinates_display= inline,title
| coordinates_ref =
| country = United States
| locale = [[Riverside County, California]]
| status = P
| construction_began =
| commissioned = 2013 (expected)
| licence_expires =
| decommissioned =
| cost =
| owner =
| operator =
| developer = Rice Solar Energy, LLC
| constructor =
| solar_farm_type = CSP
| csp_technology =
| csp_units =
| heliostats =
| thermal_power_solar=
| cpvt =
| turbine_manu_csp = [[SolarReserve]]
| land_area =
| installed_capacity =
| max_planned_cap = 150
| capacity_factor =
| average_annual_gen = 450
| net_generation =
| website = [http://ricesolarenergy.com/ www.ricesolarenergy.com]
| as_of = 19 December 2010
| extra =
}}
{{Solar power in the United States}}
[[Category:Energy resource facilities in California]]
[[Category:Proposed solar power stations in the United States]]
{{Renewable-power-plant-stub}}
{{US-powerstation-stub}}
There we go, this is what you added to it. Regards, BencherliteTalk 14:21, 21 December 2010 (UTC) License tagging for File:NASDAQOMXCommodities logo.pngThanks for uploading File:NASDAQOMXCommodities logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 25 December 2010 (UTC) Oil rocksHello, could you help me to improve this article - Neft Daşları? I think there is few errors and I would appreciate your help.--NovaSkola (talk) 12:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
|
