en User talk:Bbrink8

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Newton Howard, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bbrink8/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:12, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bbrink8, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:12, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Bbrink8/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Bbrink8/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:15, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Newton Howard has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Newton Howard. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The previous draft, that was blocking the move of your sandbox to draft space, was deleted as abandoned. I have moved your draft to draft space. It needs references. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Newton Howard (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Newton Howard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^oh hello! 01:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Newton Howard has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Newton Howard. Thanks! — kikichugirl ^oh hello! 01:51, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Newton Howard has been accepted

Newton Howard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 04:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]