Your addition to JS Group has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl(talk)12:40, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your note at my talk page. We are not able to restore copyrighted content to Wikipedia prior to authorization of license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure to authorize. We will need to be able to verify that you are the author of that piece, Salman Akram Sheikh, or to otherwise verify that the author has legally transferred copyright to you. Being affiliated with the subject of the article does not itself transfer copyright, so this verification is important.
I do have to advise you, however, that even if the content is approved, much of it is inappropriate for inclusion on Wikipedia. Once permitted, it would be greatly modified to meet our policies and guidelines.
I recognized in the history of the article that it has been subjected to vandalism by a detractor of your company. They have been persistent in this, and have also been placing copied content for which license is not verified. If you look at the top corner of the page, you will see that it contains a little lock. When cleaning up the copyright concerns, I semi-protected the page so that for several months unregistered users will not be able to modify it to prevent this ongoing misuse of the article. I have also added it to my "watchlist" for a time so that contributors who register to get around that protection will not be able to continue with that agenda.
As you are associated with the organization, please review Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for the best ways to deal with the kind of misuse that the article encountered. Wikipedia is interested in ensuring that content remains neutral and verifiable, and sometimes the only step necessary to prevent this kind of assault is to bring it to the attention of the many volunteers who work to maintain the integrity of the project. --Moonriddengirl(talk)12:15, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Bberry91077, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Removal of sourced material; how to defend interests
While we appreciate that you have an interest in making sure that the article is accurate and neutral, I'm afraid that does not extend to removing sourced material without good reason. I have returned the content you removed, which seems to meet our verifiability policies. Please see Wikipedia:COI#Defending_interests for more information about how to address any concerns you may have with this content. --Moonriddengirl(talk)17:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ok.. thanks for updating me.. i will take care of this in future
Hello. I have again removed copyrighted material from this article, which you pasted from [1] and [2]. Please stop doing this. If you don't, it will be necessary to suspend your accesss to this account. This will only make it more challenging for you to help ensure the neutrality of the article.
I linked to you above Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations on what to do to defend your interests. As it seems that a living person is involved, Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Help is also helpful. You need to work with the community in addressing your concerns. We may not be able to make it say exactly what you want, as we do have policies and guidelines that govern content. But those policies and guidelines mandate that articles msut be balanced and fair, and generally contributors will try to help you reach that if you follow those procedures. Sometimes just alerting people to issues can help. For instance, while we cannot use the material you pasted from the Tribune, we certainly can include information from it. I've expanded the article to mention the suit and the restraining order. --Moonriddengirl(talk)12:11, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from JS Group with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ForeverDusk ☾07:39, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your addition to JS Group has been edited, because it is clear that you are affiliated with the JS Group and are trying to promote this organisation. I have checked through a number of the 'cited' links you have included, and they are from sources that are verifiable or in fact often do not even state the same content which you mention in your edits. Please stop your disruptive editing, or someone will ensure you are blocked from editing without further notice.
Edit summaries
The edit summary field appears above the "Save page" button.
Hi. What happened in the section immediately above here, I'm afraid, was a misunderstanding. It was mentioned in the first message in this series that you should use an edit summary to explain the removal of content. This is a very good idea. Had you noted in an edit summary that the material you were removing here was material that you yourself had added ([3]), it's unlikely that anybody would have objected. Unfortunately, content removal on Wikipedia usually signals some ulterior motive, and since you didn't explain, they didn't understand.
Edit summaries are easy to use. When you edit Wikipedia, there is the box where you type content. Below that is some legal notices, followed by another box for your "edit summary"--where you briefly explain what you are doing. It's just above the "save" button. (See the diagram to the side.) Also helpful is the article's talk page, where you can explain what you are attempting to do, but the "edit summary" is not really something you should skip when there's a chance people might mistake your edits for vandalism.
While I'm here, I'll note that some of the content you added during this time does not really fit with our policies and guidelines. With this, for instance, Wikipedia articles are not meant to present opinions about people, such as that somebody is "an innovative businessman" or that "Role model entrepreneurs like these are vital for the economic development of Pakistan" and certainly not that somebody else's actions were "A politically motivated propaganda ...created through an amateur effort to intimidate". While our articles may record positive or negative things that sources have said about a subject, we must remain neutral here. This is one reason why people who are closely connected from subjects are discouraged from editing the articles about them. Remaining neutral can be a challenge, as it says in our guideline Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. --Moonriddengirl(talk)12:55, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, but while I'm happy to help you and even to discuss confidential matters with you outside of this very public forum, I do keep my communications in print so that I can maintain accurate records. If the assistance you are requesting does not require confidentiality, it would be best to retain it here. If it does, you are welcome to e-mail me. You will first need to enable your own e-mail address through the "preferences" tab of your account. Your e-mail address will not be public. This will then enable you to see an "e-mail this user" link in the toolbox at the side of my userpage. If you click on that, you will be able to send me a private note. See Help:Preferences. The field for your e-mail address is in a section titled "E-mail options" at the bottom of the first page. --Moonriddengirl(talk)18:59, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, some team members is continuously behind my ID, we posted the data with reliable references and its reverted back without any reason and i have updated my email address in my preference. thanks in advance for your cooperation and your kind input in this regard.
The problem with the most recent text (referenced or not) that is being added and removed is that it is very promotional. Even if it has a reference, it needs to be toned down. Wikipedia has a core policy on neutral point of view and the articles are expected to reflect that. Also, attending a conference and planning a fund don't appear to be notable events with a sure effect for the company and future that would warrant their own sections. You have admitted that you are closely associated with JS Group and by your edits, it is clear you are here to defend the article. The article is supposed to be an encyclopedic representation about the company, not a promotional page. You must understand the due weight that has to be given to different points of view in the article. You have been advised on conflict of interest and making the article a battleground as well. I am going to make some edits to the article which will shrink but still represent most the information you inserted.If you have any questions, let an editor know. It is also best to take issues regarding the article to its talk page.--NortyNort(Holla)08:41, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
