User talk:Bbarmadillo/Archive 2

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Kindly do a non-admin close for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobiloba

Hello Bbarmadillo! I wanted to let you know I have done some corrections on the article Tobiloba and now should be considered fit for Wikipedia. Therefore I'll like you to do a non-admin close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobiloba or do a 'speedy keep" for it. Thank you Kojomo (talk) 14:11, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

@Kojomo: sorry, but I don't think it is the right move to make. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
@Bbarmadillo: okay, kindly advice on what should be done and areas of the article that needs correction. Kojomo (talk) 10:46, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
@Kojomo: Please read WP:MUSICBIO. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Galbraith (property consultancy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fenty Beauty

Hello there Bbarmadillo! I just wanted to reach out to let you know that I have slightly modified the format of your non-admin close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fenty Beauty to match/comply with the instructions about where the header should go (inside the template) as outlined at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrator instructions. While a minor point, I also noticed that it probably should/could have been closed as "speedy keep" per criterion 1 of WP:SKCRIT "The nominator withdraws the nomination or fails to advance an argument for deletion or redirection—perhaps only proposing an alternative action such as moving or merging—and no one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted or redirected." Nothing needs to be changed (unless you want to of course), I just thought that I would point that out for future reference.

I also would recommend checking out User:Evad37/XFDcloser as it makes closing discussions far easier/quicker/more convenient and avoids formatting errors. All the best, TheSandDoctor Talk 06:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

TheSandDoctor thank you. It was very kind of you. Added this bot and will try to use it. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
You're welcome! I'm glad I could help. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. P.S., it isn't a bot, rather a user script, but not a big deal --TheSandDoctor Talk 02:34, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Maria E. Morris Miller

After creating the page Maria E. Morris Miller as part of the Women in Red project, I discovered another Wikipedia page with same artist but under the name Maria Frances Ann Morris. The artist seems to go by the name Maria Morris Miller in the official references so a solution might be to merge the two Wikipedia pages under the new name. Abonzz (talk) 20:55, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

If they are the same person, you can move the content to the correct article and request the deletion of the redundant page after that. Alternatively, you can set the redirect to the final page. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:58, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
What about changing her name in Wikipedia? All the books and museum websites refer to her as Maria Morris Miller (therefore not Maria E. Morris Miller or Maria Frances Ann Morris)
Abonzz This you can do youself. There is a "MOre" (with arrow) button with the "Move" option. Use it to rename the final page. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 11:16, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the info. However, the new title field does not accept any text when I use the MOVE option. I can use the "Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests" page instead. Is it possible to know why I can't move it myself?
Not sure why it is not working. I am not an admin, so you better ask someone else (for instance, Moral edits who welcomed you to Wikipedia). But yes, you can write such request. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 16:33, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
I assumed you were an admin and wouldn't have bothered you if I knew. Thanks for your help!
I am not an admin and will never be, given my background of a paid editor. :) -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:18, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Improve references at Albert Krause page

@Bbarmadillo: I'm looking for some feedback on what needs to be improved/changed on the page. Thanks for your help! detty1024 --Detty1024 (talk) 19:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Detty1024 You are welcome. The concept is very simple. On Wikipedia every fact should be properly referenced, that is having a proof-link to support it. Please read this guide}. You can use [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_web cite web template for web links and cite book template for the book mentions. I believe Google Books should have some mentions. Good luck with your edits! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

@Bbarmadillo: Thanks for the feedback. I meant which specific item on the page are you referring to that is missing a reference? I’m trying to make sure I have everything covered wherever necessary. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Detty1024 (talk • contribs) 12:11, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Detty1024 Added 1 references and coded another one for you. Hope it explains the concept. You might also want to code the newspaper clip to the same format. I don't know which newspaper it was and other details, so cannot do it for you. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:47, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antoine Blondeau (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 13:36, 15 April 2018 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello, Bbarmadillo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 13:36, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Marisa Peer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marisa Peer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marisa Peer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

RE: Suggestions for improving Paani Foundation

Thank you BBarmadillo for your feedback. I confess I am not adept at prettyprinting articles :). Will improve the references as per your suggestion. - Electronz (talk) 06:59, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

@Electronz: You are welcome! -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beast (street artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


RE: Thanks for your work on Paolo Alberto Rossi

It was well done and greatly appreciated. Ccirulli (talk) 23:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)CCirulli

@Ccirulli: you are welcome! -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 04:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia.

Please advise me about the article: Draft: Peace Treaty on Korean Peninsula
I would highly appreciate it if I can get your general opinion about the article whether it can be uploaded to the main space of Wikipedia.
For your information, It was created this article about five weeks ago. From my understanding, it would meet the requirement of Wikipedia article on the main space as per the Wikipedia:Notability,WP:10YT, Wikipedia:Verifiability. 

Goodtiming8871 (talk) 06:28, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I am not a reviewer so you are probably wasting your baklava :) --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:28, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Roman Avdeev has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Roman Avdeev. Thanks!  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  23:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roman Avdeev has been accepted

Roman Avdeev, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  04:19, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
@Mr. Guye: thank you for reviewing this article. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George McVeagh has been accepted

George McVeagh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 17:59, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
@Bellezzasolo: thank you for reviewing this submission. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Great article creation in George McVeagh! Keep it up! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 05:48, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
@SshibumXZ: thank you! -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bbarmadillo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Atlético

Hi. I saw your message at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mexico/Assessment regarding Atlético. I looked through Spanish-language sources and hardly found anything useful about the art collection. The editor who created the article, Rogelio vazquez (courtesy ping), has only edited Wikipedia less than 3 times and doesn't appear to be active. I'm afraid the article fails in notability and verifiability, so I will likely submit to Articles for Deletion. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you for your contributions. MX (✉ • ✎) 14:50, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

@MX: Thank you for reviewing this. That was my intention as well, but I was not sure, so decided to ask. Please go on with the deletion if you think that this is the right thing to do. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:15, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Namely (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Irish Whiskey Rebellion (1972 Film) has been accepted

The Irish Whiskey Rebellion (1972 Film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Catrìona (talk) 17:19, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
@Catrìona: Thank you for reviewing this article. This was my first contribution for WP:RESCUE. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:56, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Storror has been accepted

Storror, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
@Atlantic306: Thank you for reviewing this draft. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:42, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wim Brands has been accepted

Wim Brands, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Thsmi002 (talk) 04:42, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
@Thsmi002: Thank you for reviewing this draft. I've also linked it to the Dutch article. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:43, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghostheads has been accepted

Ghostheads, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

North America1000 13:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
@Northamerica1000: Thank you for reviewing this draft. And Happy New Year! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 16:07, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Sure thing, and...

Happy New Year!

Bbarmadillo,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! North America1000 16:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Studio DRIFT has been accepted

Studio DRIFT, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ShunDream (talk) 04:43, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
@ShunDream: Than you for reviewing this draft. And Happy New Year! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:38, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicole Dennis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Eric Schulz

Hello, Bbarmadillo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eric Schulz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 13:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Request for rescuing Red in Red (band)

Could you please try and rescue the page for the Irish band: Run in Red (band)? -- Schlossbergfes‬‬‬

Dear @Schlossbergfes: within my work at WP:RESCUE/WP:ABANDONED I only recover drafts that were declined for submission but present some value for Wikipedia. The article in question was not a draft, but an existing article and it was deleted after a proper deletion discussion where you participated. So, unless there are a lot more publications establishing its notability it won't and shouldn't be recovered. Please read WP:NMG for more details. Hope it helps. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:42, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Apereo Foundation (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jake Brockman was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sourcing seems focussed on "business as usual"-type coverage, trivial mentions, PR or blogs. Insufficient coverage in independent, reliable media as per WP:NORG
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 16:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
@Jake Brockman: Thank you for reviewing this draft. I've contacted it's original author and passed this info to him. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2019 (UTC)


Your "speedy deletion" of the article entitled 'James Devoy'

The article is about a real person, and I gather that you are concerned that it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant. You may not feel that the subject is personally significant to you, but the article very clearly indicates why it is. To delete it without any discussion, or opportunity dispute your opinion, oversteps your role as a Wikipedian. I do not believe you could point to a reason as to why this inclusion is not significant, which would reasonably be anything other than your own personal opinion. Under the rules of Wikipedia - which I am quite familiar with - this article does state credibly why the subject is important and cites numerous reliable sources to support that. For simplicity, I would ask you to reverse your decision, but if that is not forthcoming I will re-upload the article within the week. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackf834 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lindal Cedar Homes has been accepted

Lindal Cedar Homes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SITH (talk) 16:05, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
@StraussInTheHouse: Thank you for reviewing this draft. I will notify the original author of the article. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Gabe Crecion notability

Hello, I saw that you posted a notice on the Gabe Crecion article indicating that he may not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. Please refer to WP:NGRIDIRON, particularly in point #1, where it states that any football player who has appeared in at least one regular season or postseason game in the National Football League automatically meets the notability requirements. I have thus removed that notice. I am also in the process of creating articles for similar players who have played in the NFL for short periods of time. So prior to posting that notice again on any other pages, please refer to WP:NGRIDIRON to confirm if the page meets the notability requirements. Thanks Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 22:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Right, the player who appeared in 1 game is definitely notable. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tide (banking) has been accepted

Tide (banking), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 15:40, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Citekill Madness!

Hello, you may remember the ref-bombing saga at Hair Peace Salon, and this page section's title was your own excellent assessment! The same user's tactics have been noticed elsewhere. Consider joining this discussion: [1]. Thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:32, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

DOOMSDAYER520 Thanks. I commented there. Will be happy to do some cleanup for their articles. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 05:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Cleaned it up a bit. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:31, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Eric Schulz

Hello, Bbarmadillo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eric Schulz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 09:33, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Allen3

It would be nice if he could help, - we miss him. Please consider to self-revert and try elsewhere. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:29, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Thank you, I noticed it right after I posted a comment on their talk page :) --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:33, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

TheGamer

Hello! You haven't nominated it properly for deletion. The AFD template in the article redirects to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheGamer. I think you will have to manually do it by Twinkle? Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:30, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

@Jovanmilic97: Twinkle was what I used, hmm. Not sure how it happened. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:32, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Seems someone fixed it. You will have to edit the nomination statement. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheGamer. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:36, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Tucumán Arde - broken links

Thank you for approving the seed article for Tucumán Arde. It has a notice that it's an orphan, but the event is mentioned in three other articles, each of which have links to Tucumán Arde. There seems to be a mismatch and I'm wondering if that's because Arde is NOT capitalized in the main article. If that's the case, can you capitalize it? It's a proper name, so it should be. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redbaron10 (talk • contribs) 13:43, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Look, I just added categories to it. I am not an expert in this subject. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:30, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zava (July 27)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:NORG.
K.e.coffman (talk) 15:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
K.e.coffman thank you for reviewing the article. Please give me a more detailed feedback on which points of WP:NORG the article fails to meet. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:23, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
@K.e.coffman: also the article is not about a company, but about a website, so WP:WEB is more relevant for this draft.--Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:38, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
I self-reverted my rejection. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:55, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Natwar Gandhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SEC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello Bbaemadillo, can you please disclose your paid status over Draft:Micah Altman and also please provide links on your Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where you advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services e.g. your Upwork account etc. as per WP:PAID. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:56, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

GSS For sure, I will give a full disclosure for Draft:Micah Altman. The thing is that I haven't started working on it yet. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:43, 10 August 2019 (UTC)