Hello, Bashevis6920, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Anna Lincoln 13:37, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Intento mejorar las fotos existentes, nada más. Creo que con buen criterio. --BernardaAlba (talk) 19:18, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Una foto de una actriz espanola con oscar y el directos más internacional que jamás ha tenido el país en el apartado de cine, o una foto de uno de los mejores tenistas mundiales de la historia, o poner las fotos de los literatos en la parte de literatura me parecen muy correctos. --BernardaAlba (talk) 19:27, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Es curioso ver como menciona a almodovar pasando de largo a la UNICA ACTRIZ DEL PAIS CON OSCAR, además del resto de cuestiones que le mencioné. muy revelador. --BernardaAlba (talk) 19:39, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bashevis6920, you clearly have not looked at the sources in question. Please refrain from randomly deleting sources and content. Akerbeltz (talk) 18:13, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- PS Source have to be *reliable* but that does not mean they have to be online documents. Akerbeltz (talk) 18:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The last information you added about the spanishness of Elcano [1] is very likely to be true (I tried to check it, but spent less than one minute after this checking and left it), but it would be a better discipline, especially in this contentious context, to try to bring a source - you are certainly right to demand much to other editors, but I think you should ask as much to yourself. Touriste (talk) 21:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm JamesBWatson. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Circumnavigation with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, JamesBWatson (talk) 21:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hola, ¿cómo te va? ¿hablas español? Supongo que sí, si tus ediciones y aportaciones mayormente van dirigidas u orientadas hacia artículos relacionados con España y lo español. Estaba pensando en denunciar el pequeño problema que hemos tenido sobre las áreas metropolitanas españolas al panel de administradores de la Wikipedia. Sin embargo, no pienso que sea necesario ni beneficioso para nadie llevar las cosas al extremo. Discutir y pelear no es lo mío, no es algo que yo persiga. Me considero una persona tranquila, muy relajada, y honesta, y he de decirte que mi finalidad no es delatar ni descalificar a nadie, sino la justicia, y que, por ello, entiendo tu posición como la de otra persona. Querría proponerte si te apetece, de buena voluntad, colaborar conmigo y ayudarme a actualizar la sección de las áreas metropolitanas de una manera racional y humilde, y que no sea al azar.
Asimismo, quiero comunicarte que voy a volver a revertir la página. Y que a partir de ahí podemos debatir en la página principal ¿Te parece bien?
Los posibles debates que podríamos hacer son:
- ¿Qué fuentes podemos utilizar como base? ESPON, AUDIT5, Ruiz Alarcos, etc.
- Fuentes alternativas ¿cuáles?
Gracias por tu atención, un saludo. Alburzador (talk) 02:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I would also urge you to read WP:CONSENSUS - you appear to be stripping out the concept that Basque is a ethnic group - that is offensive not only to those who are members of that group, but also to the consensus achieved not only on Wikipedia, but most of the world. Please refrain from editing activities that destroy the identity of millions, and run contrary to WP:NPOV, WP:FRINGE, good faith, and common sense (✉→BWilkins←✎) 16:38, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- My English is pretty bad, and I can easily express my ideas. I request you to please check the latest edition of Akerbeltz, which he eliminated the "template:Spanish people" 1, although that was not discussed. Thanks. --Bashevis6920 (talk) 16:58, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No one is giving you hard time over your English, there are plenty of people who make very valuable contributions to the English Wikipedia who have very poor English. It's your inability (to date) to engage in a calm debate and to accept that just because you say so doesn't make something right. Akerbeltz (talk) 17:43, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's a shame that would let you do issues like this 1, 2, 3, Akerbeltz. But it seems that the English Wikipedia is like a jungle, supporting ideas so absurd as the Catalans or Valencians are an ethnic group. On the other hand it explains the sad state of many articles.
Not worth continue editing with admin. like Mr. BWilkins, that encourage people like you.--Bashevis6920 (talk) 18:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you not even see the racist undertones of your statements? Your English can't be so bad that you do not recognize it (✉→BWilkins←✎) 23:05, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You know nothing about the reality of Basque nationalism in Spain. You probably do not know anything of the extremist and disparate principles of Basque people like Sabino Arana, and his racist theories. And do not know anything about the linguistic theories of vascoiberismo, which are one of the most important considerations related to Basque language.
- And also, you are protecting absolutely unsustainable issues such as those undertaken Akerbeltz over the course of ethnic Catalans and Valencians, held from blogs and pages themselves, something prohibited in Wikipedia (in all languages).
- You are sheltering an ethnicities (races) apologist like Akerbeltz, don't you see, Mr.BWilkins? Or are you?
- In six years editing Wikipedia in Spanish, Wikimedia Commons and other projects, as anonymous and with my nick, I was never punished.
- Congratulations, Mr.BWilkins. --Bashevis6920 (talk) 23:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I would recommend you a) stop your WP:BATTLE here, b) immediately strikeout your personal attacks above, and c) recognize that I have never in my life punished - I'm protecting this project from your BS. Remove your personal attacks, or I will be forced to remove your access to this talkpage and quite likely extend your block (✉→BWilkins←✎) 00:25, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Do what you want, I will not edit more in English Wikipedia. You do not deserve to be an administrator, Mr.BWilkins --Bashevis6920 (talk) 00:34, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Conversation between two admins.- (unbelievable!!!)
- == Odd ==
- I was just in the process of declining the AIV on Akerbelz ... the OP is a real piece of work, and it's them who are clearly the vandal ... see their talkpage .... -->BWilkins
- See my supplemental note on akerbelz block. If you disagree, either let me know and I'll unblock, or feel free to unblock him yourself. -->Toddst1
- Yeah, so he didn't report ... his 3RR is excused because the OP's is clearly vandalism/racism/fringe ... if you gave this guy 1 day, then the OP should have a couple of weeks ... -->BWilkins
- Ah. didn't see that. I'll unblock. Thanks. -->Toddst1
- Cheers ... I think I'll keep an eye on both of them for a bit though. Methinks one of them may be pushing for an indef -->BWilkins
- Hmm...remember how I said one was aiming for an indef? have a look--> BWilkins
--Bashevis6920 (talk) 00:58, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You're lucky that my English is very bad, because if not, I would denounce you for bad admin. Mr.BWilkins. --Bashevis6920 (talk) 01:21, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bashevis6920, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Valenciano (talk) 20:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
