User talk:Banaster Giver Extra Polite

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	You are the pride and joy of Wikipedia! Without people like you Wikipedia would not move forward! Banaster Giver Extra Polite (talk) 11:37, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Glaisher [talk] 11:55, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Banaster Giver Extra Polite, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.   Introduction  5   The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help   Tips   How to write a great article   Manual of Style   Be Bold   Assume Good faith   Get adopted

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC. You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:56, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Please stop giving everyone barnstars. They are intended to be given out sparingly and for a purpose. Thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:56, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Giving them out to some of the most active people.Banaster Giver Extra Polite (talk) 12:02, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But this is NOT a social-networking site. ES&L 12:11, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know but surely encouraging the most active wikipedians to carry on editing using some banasters can't hurt wikipedia.Banaster Giver Extra Polite (talk) 12:13, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We appreciate the appreciation Banaster, but yeah, if you mass give them out it concerns some people who see it as spamming. Thanks for the good thought anyway and hope you enjoy editing here.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:27, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would be spamming, if I chose to give out 10 banisters to a single person, but I am only giving 1 pp.Banaster Giver Extra Polite (talk) 12:30, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing them is even more disruptive Banaster. I didn't object to receiving one. Just I don't want to see you blocked for a good gesture.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Dr. Blofeld. It would be a shame for you to receive a block for giving out barnstars. I think they are great but other Editors have a negative view towards them. Liz ^Read! Talk! 13:13, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They received their block for socking. The SPI is enlightening. Drmies (talk) 17:43, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• And their NOTHERE intent is clear, given the number of "unblock" templates they spammed in a couple of minutes ago (to which I hit the rollback button) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:45, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Special:Contributions/Banaster_Giver_Extra_Polite. Thank you.Glaisher [talk] 12:16, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, i'll defend my actions.Banaster Giver Extra Polite (talk) 12:20, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar Barnstar
		Thanks, and don't let them bring you down. Smallbones(smalltalk) 13:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't begin to express my appreciation. All I want to do is encourage people and I get referred to as a 'vandal'.Banaster Giver Extra Polite (talk) 13:14, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bah, people like me appreciate the effort. Just make sure the reason is good and beyond the norm of the community. I'll do tens of thousands of edits without a barnstar, but I'd do them anyways. Just don't give them to people who express they don't want them; which you can only find out the hard way, sadly. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:41, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you, for spreading good cheer!

As long as you know your heart, what biters say doesn't matter!! Much love and gratitude. :) Ekabhishek^talk 16:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Banaster Giver Extra Polite (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Banaster Giver Extra Polite (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is a new form of 'low'. I spend hours encouraging editors and this is how you respond. I demand you unblock me with immediate conditions. Banaster Giver Extra Polite (talk) 16:46, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please use your primary account to request an unblock. Kuru (talk) 16:49, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• That's going to be difficult since I just revoked talk page access there. They can email ArbCom. Drmies (talk) 17:36, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ease up

If you need instruction on requesting unblock, just ask. Acting out will only result in losing the ability to edit this page. Tiderolls 17:45, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Wait--Tide, they already did. Did you see the stunt they pulled here? Almost crashed my delicate little crimson-colored netbook. Drmies (talk) 17:51, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UTRS

Obviously my message was not well received. The link in this section header is your path to unblock, if one exists. From your original account, please. Tiderolls 18:03, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]