User talk:BFDIBebbleAny frivolous messages will not be responded to. Please sign your posts. Goldin Finance EditsHello: Thank you for your note and careful read of my edits. I am a new volunteer, so appreciate any guidance and feedback. To be clear, the sentence I added was sourced to the same citation (Asia Today, maybe FEER...) as the sentence which preceded it. I found the original text to inadequately explain why construction was stopped and that explanation was easily found in the cited source - so I added it. I did not add a source citation (footnote) because the two sentences had the same source. Should I have added an additional footnote citing the same source? Best regards and thanks again, Roberto Roberto28281 (talk) 19:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Blocked for sockpuppetry
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. |