User talk:AzaToth/Archives/2009/October
Twinkle blacklistThere appears to be a problem with the twinkle blacklist. Despite the fact that the user Radiopathy (talk · contribs) was added to the blacklist as seen here, he is still able to use twinkle, as seen here.— Dædαlus Contribs 22:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
ReplyI just checked first two articles, and they both lacked citations regarding the latest prize. Please see Wikipedia:In_the_news#Updated_content: "The decision as to when an item is updated 'enough' is subjective, but a five sentence update (with at minimum three references, not counting duplicates) has generally been considered more than sufficient, while a one sentence update is considered extremely questionable." --BorgQueen (talk) 10:50, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Template:TestTemplatesList has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. RL0919 (talk) 16:47, 16 October 2009 (UTC) TwinkleHi Aza, I notice that the WP:Twinkle and Wikipedia:Twinkle/doc pages advise inserting "ImportScript" statements which are directed to pages in your userspace for manual or partial installation of Twinkle. I note that those pages are not protected. Is that wise? an awful lot of users could be affected. SpinningSpark 11:46, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
TwinkleHey, AzaToth! I found a spelling error when I was reviewing the script that requests page protection. Look at the line that says the following: self.statelem.warn( [ htmlNode( 'strong', tag[0] ) , " is alread placed on the page." ] ) Alread is a spelling mistake. It should be changed to already. Please tell me on my user talk page once you fix this error. BTW, I love twinkle! Thank you so much for creating it! Btilm 18:23, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
|