User talk:Awangba Mangang

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! FriyMan (talk) 05:42, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


History of Manipur in the PuYa burning session

Hi,

The PuYa burning session is unnecessary long and without any reliable citation or references. So, please shorten it for the improvement of readability and reliability. Sanjoydey33 (talk) 23:50, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjoydey33 How can you say that unnecessary,We lost our historical documents and sacred books of Sanamahi Religion during king Pamheiba reigned.Hindu Preist imigrants from West Bengal who are Foreigners made natives people's killed under king Pamheiba in 1729 to 1732 If you want link or reference here are
  1. https://www.ifp.co.in/page/items/37017/puya-mei-thaba-remembered

http://www.thesangaiexpress.com/pumanil-remembers-puya-mei-thaba-numit/

https://www.imphaltimes.com/news/item/4068-puya-mei-thaba-numit

http://e-pao.net/epSubPageExtractor.asp?src=news_section.opinions.The_Effects_of_Burning_of_Meitei_Puyas_By_Madhu_Chandra

http://kanglaonline.com/2010/10/burning-of-puya-commemorated-as-black-day-by-acoam/

https://www.imphaltimes.com/it-articles/item/11938-historical-evaluation-of-puya-meithaba-a-contemporary-re-interpretation

https://kapilarambam.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-ultimate-sacrilege.html?m=1 Awangba Mangang (talk) 04:40, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script

Information icon - Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Chajing Khunou, and several other articles, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 13:38, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Moirangthem Nara

Notice

The article Moirangthem Nara has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. TheWinRatHere! 15:53, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thewinrat don't worry I will add references I still in process of editing. Awangba Mangang (talk) 15:59, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Awangba Mangang: Thank you. --TheWinRatHere! 16:01, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tumukhong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chandel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sajik Tampak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chandel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jayenta Loukrakpam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jayenta Loukrakpam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayenta Loukrakpam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wakowako (talk) 12:08, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of your recent edits were simple copying other people's writing, not acceptable for Wikipedia and marked as ″Copyright © 1999-2019 E-Pao! All Rights Reserved″, into Wikipedia. Please write in your own words or not at all. If you persist in violating copyright, then I or another administrator will revoke your editing privileges for the protection of the project. Uncle G (talk) 13:26, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: Because Manipur has less internet users,less news website and even news channel don't update news on their news website. Awangba Mangang (talk) 10:46, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sajik Tampak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sajik Tampak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from indikosh.com/vill/285614/sajik-tampak. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wakowako (talk) 07:51, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wakowako:If you want Delete it.
  • I don't need your approval.
  • If you are Pro wikipedians you can just edit and remove copying section instead of Deleting whole page.

Awangba Mangang (talk) 09:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Awangba Mangang:
  • AfD only needs approval from administrators.
  • If you are a PRO you will not violate WP:G12
  • You obviously violates wikipedia's Wikipedia's copyright policy on articles you have created.
  • If you are a good editor, you will write articles in your own words and not just a copypaste from copyrighted articles.
  • A good editor do not persist in violating copyright, if you do so and continue to vandalize Wikipedia again, an administrator may blocked you from editing and you will be banned without further notice

--Wakowako (talk) 10:21, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha ha Wtf! Go on I mean you are pro to edit articles even you can edit and remove copying section instead of proposed to be deleting whole page. Awangba Mangang (talk) 10:57, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sajik Tampak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sajik Tampak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajik Tampak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wakowako (talk) 10:41, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Folktales of Meetei

A tag has been placed on Category:Folktales of Meetei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:46, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page Issue

Can we convert the draft page "Culture Of Manipur" to a main page? Goutamkumar Oinam (talk) 10:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Goutamkumar Oinam (talk) 09:04, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brother, sigise amukta yengbiyu

Brother, eina page Kanglei mythology haina ama semjabase amukta awat apaa yengbiyu. Goutamkumar Oinam (talk) 09:05, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brother, problem ama leire

Eigi account "Goutamkumar Oinam" Haibadu sijinaba yadre, adult eina account amamuk hange "Goutamkumar Oinam 2" haina, ado ei Keidouba hage? Goutamkumar Oinam 2 (talk) 02:54, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Goutamkumar Oinam 2: admin singna Block toudradi edit touba yani. Ei na account Goutamkumar Oinam da changa ga yengbadadi asoiba leite

VPN gumba sijinaradi edit touba yadabaani. Pasword ningsingiba natra Houjik ki oinadi asoiba oode Awangba Mangang (talk) 03:41, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bro sisu amukta Yengbiyu

Bro, "Loktak day" amadi "Lai Khutshangbi" Page anise awat apaa amukta Yengbiyu. "Loktak day" Si deletion message amasu tharakpane. Goutamkumar Oinam 2 (talk) 11:58, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Naga languages

The article Naga languages is based on the classification of Naga languages and it sub group as per Glottolog. Not all language in the article are spoken by Naga people but are languages classified under the heading Naga. Manipuri being Naga languages or not is controversial but as per the primary source of the article i.e. Glottolog it is under Naga languages. Please go to the link given for glottolog in Manipuri language article of Wikipedia. Thanks. https://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/mani1292 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alterego speaks (talk • contribs) 18:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page maming hongviyu

Page "Ibudhou Thangjing Temple" Du "Ebudhou Thangjing Temple" Haina amukta hongviyu "I" gi mahuta "E" Oina. Goutamkumar Oinam 2 (talk) 03:10, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dmitry Bukhman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dmitry Bukhman, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 10:50, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page maming Amata hongviyu

Tamo, page " Kanglei mythology" Du henna google da popular oinaba "Manipuri mythology " Haina Semdokpa Yagadra, Yaragadi amukta hongviyu. Goutamkumar Oinam 2 (talk) 14:50, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kanglei mythology haibaduna henna meeteilon su yaobabina fajaba henli adum leijabana feida. India haiba wahei c ju hindi da arak adi Bharat haina enei.
Manipuri haibaji English wahei amani SanKsrit wahei ManiPur da i hapchinlaga English onthokpani.Awangba Mangang (talk) 04:00, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sigi awat apa Yengbiyu

"Moirang Kangleirol" amadi "Moirang Shayon " Page anise awat apa Yengbiyu Goutamkumar Oinam 2 (talk) 08:33, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lists of names of mythical creatures in Ancient Meetei Folklore

A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of names of mythical creatures in Ancient Meetei Folklore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:51, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Imphal West

A tag has been placed on Category:Imphal West requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem leire.

Page Nongthang Leima do problem ama leiba maale, mateng Pangbiyo. Kangleingakpa (talk) 12:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ahenba yam hapchinluno , Hapke hairadi source/reference internet website ta fangba du oina hapiyo.

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Awangba Mangang

Thank you for creating Dmitry Bukhman.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Neuton (network)

Notice

The article Neuton (network) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article referenced to dubious sources; the Forbes piece is by an ex-contributor and the Reuters piece is sponsored by the company.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Insignia Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Insignia Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maxpay

Notice

The article Maxpay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article with niche trade sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:44, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion

Hi, can you please answer whether you are a paid editor and/or have a conflict of interest with the articles about companies and businessmen you have created? Paid editing is permitted on Wikipedia but it must be declared on your userpage and the talkpage of any articles you edit for payment or have a coi, as per WP:PAID, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Iam not a paid editor or not have a conflict of interest. Does all the sources from frobes are spam or promotion,can't used as Wikipedia articles references?

Awangba Mangang (talk) 07:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page draft toukhre

Bro, page "Moirang Shayon" amasung "Moirang Kangleirol" page anido draft toukhre, Kamai tousige? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4066:183:700B:B4F3:33E4:7FF8:CFF1 (talk) 11:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neuton (network) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neuton (network) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuton (network) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:49, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maxpay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maxpay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxpay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:51, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Cools for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Cools is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cools until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creepTalk 18:41, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Owusu A. Kizito for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Owusu A. Kizito is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owusu A. Kizito until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:18, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AXDRAFT

Notice

The article AXDRAFT has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to be native advertising of a start up company that does not pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Of the given references: ref1 is not significant coverage, ref in brackets is a pr site, ref2 is not significant coverage, ref 3-7 are from unreliable or questionable sources, ref8 is a blog.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 16:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Puya Lailik

Template:Puya Lailik has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 17:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dmitry Bukhman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dmitry Bukhman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitry Bukhman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:50, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 09:47, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Awangba Mangang (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I write articles which sources and references are from news websites as well as megazine websites. In future I wouldn't contribute articles related with Company or business which might affect wikipedia (advertisement).

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:19, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Richard Nii-Armah Quaye

Notice

The article Richard Nii-Armah Quaye has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article about a businessman seems to be native advertising created by a now blocked suspected undisclosed paid editor. The sources are a mixture of promotional copy, unreliable sources, and minor coverage with most of the facts about him coming from softball interviews so WP:BASIC is not passed in my view

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:15, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Parimatch (company)

Notice

The article Parimatch (company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An article about a betting company that seems to be native advertising. It was created and mainly edited by a now blocked suspected paid editor and is promotional in tone. The sources are a mixture of unreliable, promotional, and minor coverage that do not pass the bar of WP:CORPDEPTH in my view,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:46, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Parimatch (company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parimatch (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parimatch (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Names of God in Sanamahism has been nominated for deletion

Category:Names of God in Sanamahism has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Redtigerxyz Talk 04:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Clans of Meitei has been nominated for renaming

Category:Clans of Meitei has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 18:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]