|
User talk:Avicenno/أرشيف 1
Anytime in my talk page you can talk with me about any thing. Links to Arabic-wikipedia articles You are receiving this as you have recently added an interwiki link to a page! Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this. This means that on Wikipedia articles there is now a language bar on the left hand side of your screen where you can edit and add links rather than adding them into the articles themselves. If you have any questions regarding Wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata. DMacks (talk) 17:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC) Deletion nominationsPlease do not tag pages for speedy deletion unless they meet the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you, —Kusma (t·c) 12:24, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Bata-aminoisobutyrate
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Bata-aminoisobutyrate. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 3-Aminoisobutyric acid. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 3-Aminoisobutyric acid – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page. If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Dengero (talk) 14:30, 11 October 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 11Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Xanthosine triphosphate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:56, 11 October 2014 (UTC) SorryI didn't mean to be offensive about non-native speakers generally. My point to the other editgor was that one should make an effort to at least get simple sentences basically correct. It is no easy matter to write in a foreign language, and generally the effort to do so is deeply appreciated, especially in difficult areas of Wikipedia where local (non-'Western')input is lacking. By the way, I will be shortly, in a day or two, adding a major rewrite of an article here, which uses extensively transcriptions from Arabic, and would appreciate your assistance in reviewing these parts so that the accents, long and short vowels, are regularly transcribed throughout. Best wishes. Nishidani (talk) 09:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
April 2015
Disambiguation link notification for April 28Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trench fever, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC) Macrophage"Macrophages contain some amount of iron reaches 500 mg" really does not make any sense. A Macrophage cannot contain 500mg of iron because they are only about 21 microns in diameter so their total mass is far less than 500 mg. If you include a link that can be followed then maybe someone can clarify what you are trying to say and why it is significant. Mtpaley (talk) 21:38, 12 May 2015 (UTC) OK maybe all the macrophages in the body contain a total of 500 mg of Iron but is this actually significant? Why put this in the article? Mtpaley (talk) 19:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 30Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dystrophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tissue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC) Hi, Warning Your recent editing history at History of Jordanian wine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Your refusal to accept basic speedy deletion policy increases the likelihood that you will lose your editing privileges if you restore the speedy tag again. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Edit warring at History of Jordanian wine {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)  Avicenno (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: what happen was misunderstanding. And the creator who remove the template 2 times and break speedy deletion policy is not blocked! مصعب (talk) 05:51, 30 December 2015 (UTC) Decline reason: Multiple people told you that your speedy nomination wasn't appropriate, the result was a classic "one vs. many" where you have gone over the blockable limit of reverts while others didn't. Please understand that while your block says "edit warrning", you might as well have been blocked for disruptive editing because your nominations were clearly inappropriate. Please wait out your block and don't mess with that article in the future. Max Semenik (talk) 10:53, 30 December 2015 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Avicenno (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Anotger time i am a new user althght i am here from 2 years but iam not involved with real editing but just simple edits. see google translate editor is translated "محرر" and in arabic wiki there is a flag for editors see here. So that thind make me misunderstand policy and after i realized my fault i saied sorry here and after that i dont remove the templatem. While the creator who realize the policy of wp:speedy that state crealy that creator mustnt remove deletion template and the creator remove not once but twice and my reverting of his edits is not a break of 3RR policy because its a clear vandalism for creator to remove the template and noone even warn him for his braking the policy and he wasnt banned because of this break to policy. It is not fair to ban who misunderstood and dont ban who break the policy clearly or even warn him. Those users who remove the template dont assume agood faith and from first edit thay consider my edits vandalism. Wkipedia is free encyclopedia where no one force users to not edit certain article in future as the admin said a bove. Admin should advice banned user not to edit the article which was disagreement about it in the near future. The admins dosent give advise but an order not edit article in future at all! .regards مصعب (talk) 11:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC) Decline reason: I don't see any acceptance that you were the disruptive editor in this case. You reverted two different editors a total of three times [1][2][3] before the article creator removed the CSD tag[4]. You reverted the removal of the speedy deletion tag a total of eight times. in one of your reverts you told an editor "speedy deletion policy indicate that any editor can remove the template but not any user or any IP. You are not editor. Dont force your opinion." The person who removed it is an editor and they had every right to remove it. You were trying to force your opinion on the article by your disruptive reverts. You should use the rest of your time away from editing to read the policies of this Wikipedia. -- GB fan 00:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
FWIW, as the editor who reported this user, I believe this may indeed have been a misunderstanding of policy by a new, non native English speaking user, and I would be ok with shortening his block to 'time served'. Bad Dryer (talk) 16:38, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 26Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fatigue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 4Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neonatology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chronic lung disease. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 4 April 2016 (UTC) WP:ANII asked admins at WP:ANI to undo your unilateral move of Category:Palestinian terrorism for the reasons I mentioned there. Nothing personal. Please feel free to comment there. Debresser (talk) 23:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC) Terrorism exists, and is distinct from political violence... such as in the case of the Dolphinarium discotheque massacre. The simplest definition of terrorism, indiscriminate murder of civilians not directly involved in a conflict, applies there 100%. If you are training to become a doctor, one of the most moral-based professions with a study concluded by an ethical oath, you should know what the difference is between, say, stone-throwing against military vehicles and even settlers, or armed fight against the Israeli occupation force, and blowing up minors at a discotheque. If you want to be taken serious as a human being by anyone, please pause, think it through, and draw your conclusions. "Kill them before they grow up and can kill you/fight back" is beyond inhumane.Arminden (talk) 01:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC) October 2016As per WP:TPO editors are allowed to remove anything on their talkpage and editors reverting you isn't edit warring, I've removed your AN3 report as it's not edit warring at all, I would advise you to read wp:edit warring before making any more reports like that,
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, مصعب. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 2017 attack in TurkeyThe Young lady is listed as an Israeli in the list, we do not list the same person twice. So if you have a source that says she is a Palestinian please explain on the talk page why this should take precedence of her being an Israeli please.Slatersteven (talk) 22:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
|
