|
User talk:AuzandilAugust 2023
Pablov95 "200 words"Add link to user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pablov95 about the 200 words rule 92.17.198.220 (talk) 20:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Our policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
3rr Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Canterbury Tail talk 21:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC) ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Brazilian Stalinist "year" Vandal whom you've dealt withUser contributions for 2001:8003:DDB1:C600:B015:1D76:F1EC:EED4 - Wikipedia User contributions for 2804:D59:1502:E190:C87B:7449:7AED:608D - Wikipedia User contributions for Wladimiroclarine - Wikipedia User contributions for 2804:D4B:9A19:8900:DC7:FA7C:29E5:65C7 - Wikipedia Pilar Primo de Rivera: Revision history - Wikipedia User contributions for 2804:D4B:9A08:D000:718F:F8C6:4B73:7AE6 - Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1956_Georgian_demonstrations&action=history : Many socks in this page which I've not linked User contributions for 2001:8003:4000:0:0:0:0:0/35 - Wikipedia : One of their ranges, tagged by User:Drmies Could you help me in starting a SPI? Theofunny (talk) 22:04, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
TMDKCage Match is not a reliable source for group memberships. It is only reliable for match results. See the source guide. The timeline is unsourced. Please do not re-add it. Addicted4517 (talk) 07:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
