User talk:Astronomer13January 2014Hello, I'm Jack Greenmaven. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Horsehead Nebula because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Greenmaven (talk) 03:44, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Just a quick question. Why did you not think my changes were constructive? I did not say anything negative, I just stated a fact. I believe that readers should know all the facts not just part of them. Star formation has never been observed. The way it was explained made it seem like it was tested and proven, when in fact,it has not been. It says at the top of this page "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable." - star formation is not verifiable. Thanks, Astronomer13
I'm sorry I did not reply on your page, but I am new to Wikipedia and could not figure it out.(If you could tell me how, that would be great!) I hope you find this reply. You mentioned that it takes "long periods of time"-Evolution hangs on "long periods of time". I will agree that "most" astronomers don't doubt the star formation theory. But not "all" trained astronomers do. Please look up astrophysicist Dr. Jason Lisle. I have really enjoyed his books and articles about astronomy. One book you might like talks about Star Formation, it's called 'Taking Astronomy Back'. It's been nice talking to you! Astronomer13 (talk) 03:25, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
WelcomeYou need to read up on how things are done on Wikipedia. I have added the information below to get you started. --Greenmaven (talk) 04:24, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
|