User talk:Ashliveslove/Archives/2014/December


Speedy deletion nomination of Chick Magnet (film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chick Magnet (film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Grognard Chess (talk) Ping when replying 14:28, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chick Magnet (film)

The article Chick Magnet (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable movie, only refs are to the website, and Rotten Tomatoes has quite literally 0 reviews by critics (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/chick_magnet_2011/reviews/). If that isn't an indicator of non-notability, I don't know what is. Also, doesn't fulfill any of the WP:NFILM criterion. On IMDB, the only "professional" reviews are from Movie Buzzers (a site I'm not going on as Google says it has malware), "Movie Mavericks", a WP:Self published source, and a blogspot website in German. Unless this movie is taught in some high level university classes, which I highly doubt, or was selected for preservation in a national archive, or is a huge milestone in film making, I do not think that this film is currently notable in any way whatsoever, will not be notable in the foreseeable future, and could only possibly be notable if thousands of years from now, archaeologists lose literally all knowledge of the film industry for millenia, and this film is discovered like the Rosetta Stone, and is hailed as representative of the gradual quantity increase of independent movies and the consequent downturn in quality amongst them. But the Rosetta Stone was at least notable outside of being discovered.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Grognard Chess (talk) Ping when replying 21:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC)