|
User talk:Aristophanes68/Archives/2010
Ed VegaAristophanes, It was my pleasure. I knew Ed for some time, and he really deserved it. Thanks for the note! All the best, MBernal615 (talk) 23:22, 11 January 2010 (UTC) Ed Vega article is being challengedAristophanes, The Ed Vega article has received tags, from an editor who appears to be challenging all of my work on Wikipedia. The editor placed these tags on Ed Vega without any dicussion or explanation. I wrote a response to these tags on the Ed Vega discussion page. You may want to review this response. I could remove the tags from the Ed Vega article - but if I do so, the editor who placed them there, may simply restore them. As the originator and principal architect of the article (and in the spirit of this article), I believe your voice should be heard in this matter. It's up to you, Aristophanes. Ed is no longer here to defend himself. Thanks again for starting a great article about a great writer. MBernal615 (talk) 19:42, 8 February 2010 (UTC) User:112.201.78.149Hello Aristophanes, thanks for telling me about this destructive IP, I already reported him to an admin for a temporary block. After that we have to keep an eye out for him in case it needs to be extended. Good day!--Petergriffin9901 (talk) 21:59, 14 March 2010 (UTC) Help with Nelson Denis photoAristophanes, I helped to edit the Ed Vega article a few months ago, and uploaded some photos into Ed's article. I remember that you sent me a note, and I was glad, because the article looked really great and Ed deserved it! The photos were removed and other photos which I uploaded were attacked. A photo of mine is now being attacked in the article Nelson Antonio Denis. The copyright permission was e-mailed to OTRS months ago, and it appears right there on the photo file. But it is still being "considered for deletion," even though the permission was sent. Could you look at it and (in your judgment) condsider defending this photo? It is only fair that a permission is respected, and I would really appreciate it. Thank you. 24.103.122.94 (talk) 22:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC) You are now a Reviewer Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010. Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages. When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:52, 20 June 2010 (UTC) Thank you for the updates!Hello, thank you for the updates on the pages for Ty Pak and Gary Pak, and I am so glad to know that we share common interest in topics of literature. I found these two writer's experience and writing quite unique and inspiring, and planned to find some time later to do some research about their works, and maybe add some pages for their books. Clari 2010 (talk) 20:00, 13 July 2010 (UTC) Talkback Message added 06:09, 18 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Thanks for fixing my mistake ...he tricked me into adding it back.. ....We are having an ongoing problem with that editor.05:48, 26 July 2010 (UTC) Talk:Mexican AmericanI didn't trick Moxy into anything. He seems to be a troll, most of my edits are good faith and it seems he goes round undoing ANY edit I do. And he defames me by saying that I am "causing damage" and "tricking him" which on the edit history of Mexican American, you can clearly see I did not do any such thing. Take a look at Talk:Mexican_American and check what I put at the bottom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fernirm (talk • contribs) 06:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC) DYK for Josefina Niggli
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC) I see that you have been doing work with American novelist articles. I am wondering whether you would be interested in helping me disperse the massively large category, American novels? thanks, Sadads (talk) 04:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
QuestionWhy did you make this edit [1]? Novels can be in multiple genres. Sadads (talk) 21:30, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Hey Aristophanes, sorry about butting heads with you. I ran into an earlier edit by chance and got interested, since this is precisely what I'm working on for an article--I could find a couple of references from various histories of Christianity when I'm at work tomorrow. The struggle between Christianities and liberalism in the early 19th century in Germany, for instance, produces the Kulturkampf. (The term "modern era" actually isn't quite correct, since that's "after the Middle Ages," but soit.) Christianities in Europe were duking it out with socialists before Marx, so the broader term is the better, in this case. I'll see if I can find a reference I can cite tomorrow; might be tricky, since these are very general statements. Take care, Drmies (talk) 03:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
from holawikiworkersso let me get this straight, you are a christian and your gay. sorry but it dosent work that way. maybe you should read the verses Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Holawikiworkers (talk • contribs) 18:55, 25 August 2010 (UTC) Justin Bieber awardsThanks for contributing to the merge discussion at Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Justin Bieber. If you have the chance, please comment on how the information should be merged to the Justin Bieber article. Regards, –Chase (talk) 21:57, 28 August 2010 (UTC) What about categories OF lists?Do you all work strictly with individual pages? Because there are a lot of categories of list pages, e.g., Category:Lists of writers. Should I categorize that whole category under the Index Category? Or should I tag only the individual articles in the category? Thanks, Aristophanes68 (talk) 02:22, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Dear friend , could you please assists me to solve Problem of this Article Talk:Merciline Jayakody/Temp--Wipeouting (talk) 15:30, 31 October 2010 (UTC) Nelson Antonio DenisNelson Antonio DenisAristophanes, Feliz Navidad y prospero año nuevo. I hope all is well. I'm writing to ask your assistance with Nelson Antonio Denis. Under the guise of "good faith editing," the page has been savaged and butchered by two editors who are teaming up. They eliminated entire sections and over 20 newspaper citations, all of which were carefully sourced. If you look at the page as it existed on December 12, 2010 you will see a balanced, well-researched article that had educational value -- with citations and newspaper references for every major point. The editor Off2RioRob has had problems with administrators before, so he is teaming up with someone to destroy this page. The page has been up for over a year, with no major problems. Now in two or three hours, they came by and destroyed it. If you have a chance, please take a look and provide some assistance. I cannot win an editing war against these people. The article was fair and beautiful on December 12, 2010. Now it is a mess.
|
