User talk:ArgonautOfHistory

Welcome!

Hello, EngineeringHistoricalMemory, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Engineering Historical Memory, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mori Calliope fan talk 06:05, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Engineering Historical Memory

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Engineering Historical Memory, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mori Calliope fan talk 06:05, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Engineering Historical Memory (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mori Calliope fan was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The page should not ask people to "refer to a section in an external website" because that promotes the website.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mori Calliope fan talk 06:06, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, EngineeringHistoricalMemory! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mori Calliope fan talk 06:06, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:58, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ArgonautOfHistory (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

Thank you for the feedback. Kindly find the following replies to the respective pointers above, please.1. There is no compensation received on this contribution. Although Engineering Historical Memory (EHM) (as an ongoing research project with the objective to develop and improve the EHM web application for historical resources) has been supported by a range of public and private agencies through grants and funding over the years, there is no compensation or incentive received for the creation of a Wikipedia article for EHM. The objective to create the EHM Wikipedia page is for knowledge sharing purposes.2. I understand the reasons why the account was blocked and why the draft EHM page was removed, which was due to the suspected advertising and promotional content. The account username implying the representation of the EHM database is also not permitted.I understand that Wikipedia only encourages encyclopedic content written from a neutral point of view (NPOV). Any promotional content and inappropriate external links should not be included in the Wikipedia article. I also note that the topic must be notable which should be supported by reliable and independent sources.I will not repeat the kind of edits for which I was blocked initially and I endeavour to contribute useful content that is written from NPOV without bias. Promotional language will not be used, and excess and inapt external links will also be removed.3. I do still think that EHM is a notable subject that can be added to Wikipedia. There are reliable sources discussing EHM such as peer-reviewed journals and books published by respected publishers. Having said this, when my account is unblocked, I plan to post a question in Wikipedia Teahouse to seek further views and suggestions before proceeding with any new draft. In addition, I understand that for account with a conflict of interest (COI), I should disclose and go through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process for review and feedback.Apart from the above, I also hope to contribute to other tasks on Wikipedia such as categorisation and copy-editing.Thank you. EngineeringHistoricalMemory (talk) 13:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Reasonable request, appears to understand relevant policy. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC) [reply]

I've fixed some formatting issues with your request. 331dot (talk) 21:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would you object to your proposed username being made singular so it sounds less like a group?("ArgonautOfHistory") Do you receive any compensation from the project, even without specific instructions to edit? Please note that Wikipedia is not for merely sharing knowledge, it is for summarizing what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a topic, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. 331dot (talk) 22:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the formatting edit!
Yes, it is okay to change the username to singular, i.e., ArgonautOfHistory. Appreciate the suggestion.
Yes, the research project that I am working on as a team member is funded and supported by different public and private institutions over the years, but no compensation is received for editing/contributions to Wikipedia.
Yes, I note that independent reliable sources are required to confirm the notability of the subject. My thought is that there is considerable coverage on the EHM application which has also won international awards and recognitions. However, I am keen to get more views and advice from the community and plan to post a question in Teahouse seeking more perspectives on this new topic.
Thank you. EngineeringHistoricalMemory (talk) 01:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've renamed your account. If you work for the project, that meets the definition of a paid editor, you do not have to be specifically paid to edit or specifically instructed to edit; any paid relationship triggers the disclosure requirement. You will need to make the formal paid editing disclosure. Am I correct in reading your request that you don't intend to dive right in to attempting to recreate a draft and will get some advice first, as well as make some unrelated edits? 331dot (talk) 07:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the above. Yes, I plan to get more views in Teahouse about the subject before drafting a new page, while making some unrelated edits for other Wikipedia pages after the account is unblocked. ArgonautOfHistory (talk) 08:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping, 331dot, I've gone ahead and unblocked the account. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the unblock. ArgonautOfHistory (talk) 14:40, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi ArgonautOfHistory! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Drafting a new page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:20, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @MrOllie, thank you for your message. The edits for the pages were thought to be relevant additions to the contents. However, I understand where you are coming from and will be more careful when drafting the edits moving forward. ArgonautOfHistory (talk) 02:17, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As a paid editor you should not be making edits like this at all. Instead, use talk pages and the {{requestedit}} template. - MrOllie (talk) 02:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @MrOllie for sharing the above and noted. ArgonautOfHistory (talk) 07:54, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrea Nanetti (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not clear exactly why she is notable; see WP:NPROF.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 19:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Engineering Historical Memory (EHM)

Information icon Hello, ArgonautOfHistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Engineering Historical Memory (EHM), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Andrea Nanetti

Information icon Hello, ArgonautOfHistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrea Nanetti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Engineering Historical Memory (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SmokeyJoe was:
WP:Reference bombed trivial content, including lots of broken links, making it too hard to find independent sourcing that covers the topic. I’d have expected the awards section t9 be useful, but the links are broken. Referencing the sending for evaluation seems particularly absurd.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]