User talk:Arbero/Archive 2010
Thank you in advance, take care, from Portugal, VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 02:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
VASCO, Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 14:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Have a nice weekend, from Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
OK, rest assured, won't bother you anymore, regards - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 18:05, 29 May 2010 (UTC) Just to let you know for future reference, you do not have to (and should not) remove the empty fields of an infobox. In the future, those will be necessary to fill in, and should always remain =).--Cinemaniac86Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire 18:04, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. Just so you know, I formatted the writing credits as they are supposed to be formatted according to the documentation of the template {{Infobox film}}. Cliff smith talk 23:34, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
August 2010Hello, please do not add indiscriminate details to Fight Club (film) as you did here. The film infobox does not contain every single production company involved, only the major ones. In addition, Fight Club is primarily an American film because of its American studio; any German relationship it may have is very minimal. Thanks, Erik (talk | contribs) 11:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Regarding this, please see my similar notification about Fight Club. The "studio" field should not list all production companies indiscriminately; the film infobox is intended to be a summary of the film. In the case of Confessions of a Dangerous Mind, Miramax Films is the primary studio. The assisting production companies are of little value in the infobox. If they contributed to the film in a big way, it should be detailed in the article body. Erik (talk | contribs) 15:16, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
FYI, for Black Swan (film), MOS:IMAGES says, "It is often preferable to place images of faces so that the face or eyes look toward the text. Multiple images in the same article can be staggered right-and-left." The placement of the promo image of Portman accomplishes both of these. If you're concerned about the heading runover, I don't think it's an issue. Erik (talk | contribs) 20:20, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Ipswich Town F.C.Hey Arbero, and thanks for your edits to the ITFC article. I'm a keen fan of the club, and was one of the primary editors to get the article to featured status. I noticed that most of your edits have been excellent, and just wanted to let you know that I'd sort-of reverted one of them, where I made it clear the club was an association football club, rather than just a football club. In any case, it's not a big deal, I just wanted this to be clear to an international audience where a football club isn't necessarily unambiguous. Keep up the good work, nice to have another pair of eyes and another good editor looking at my favourite article. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:23, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
HaloThanks for your help tidying up the Halo articles. One thing, though: on Halo 2 you changed the date format[1] to something inconsistent with all the other Halo articles; generally we leave dates and accessdates in references in ISO format. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 20:15, 18 September 2010 (UTC) Pedro Álvares CabralHi! You forgot to add other 2 daughters Cabral had. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 22:50, 19 September 2010 (UTC) |