en User talk:Aqsian313

April 2024

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Al-Sihah al-Sitta, may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saudi Arabia

Do not revert again. Take it to the Talk page. You are messing up the citations. DeCausa (talk) 22:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary

Please refrain from making "guesses" about authors in your edit summaries, such as "Seems as if an extremist Sufi added this." Instead, just explain your edits. Such statements are personal attacks and not reinforced here, Egeymi (talk) 19:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wahhabi War. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--TheEagle107 (talk) 21:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hi! Hope this finds you well. As part of its procedure, I'd like to notify you about the ongoing case of content dispute about Rafida, which can be viewed here: Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Rafida. Albertatiran (talk) 09:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Message

I confess to being a sock for like the 1000th time. I am leaving Wikipedia for now and hopefully, this time, would not return until after six months, in October-November 2024, or a year, April 2025 when I would be hoping to apply an unblock request hopefully. Bye for now! Aqsian313 11:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am getting some deja vu here... Anyways, you have been socking non-stop for five years, pretty optimistic to think you will get chance after a year or even less. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's quite hard to quit Wikipedia after socking for about five years. It takes time to develop self-restraint. Anyways, if I request an unblock a year later, why won't that request be accepted. You can see the change between my first edit and my later edits such as my work on the article Abu Hashim and al-Lalaka'i. I have surely improved a lot than before. Aqsian313 1:33, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

You're talking as if you're trying to quit smoking... and how about some self reflection, you have wasted Wikipedias time by socking for 5 years (!), how do you think that is going to impact your chances? Also, even now, you still make POV pushing disruptive edits, such as your overenthusiastic edits for the murderous IRI. You have even tried to impersonate yourself as an Iranian in some of your sock accounts, but you are not one. --HistoryofIran (talk) 11:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:SheryOfficial per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SheryOfficial. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 07:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]