This is an archive of past discussions with User:Apmh. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Wikipedia is not a web host for holding personal web pages unrelated to work on building the encyclopedia. You are, of course, very welcome to start making contributions to the encyclopaedia, in line with Wikipedia policies and guidelines if you are interested in doing so, but if your only interest is in writing a personal web page, then there are many web sites which provide that sort of service, but Wikipedia is not one of them. JBW (talk) 15:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
The Tips of Apmh, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi The Tips of Apmh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).
Hello The Tips of Apmh! Your additions to Draft:James Woodward have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:43, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
Hi The Tips of Apmh! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
Than you for warning the IP [[1]] however this IP is a school IP and is known for disruptions, I suggest reporting the vandalism to someone who can block editing to prevent further disruptions. Thanks for reading DamienSwann08:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:
This does not summarize what independent reliable sources say about this business, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable business. You do not need 23 citations for the first sentence.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GreenTech Energy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:GreenTech Energy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hi The Tips of Apmh! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, edit history, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
@Gab4gab: hello, in the About Us section in the official website it says "The noble initiative for setting up this engineering college was taken in the year of 2009 by the Government of Assam" --The Tips of Apmh (talk) 19:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for that information. Go ahead and add it again with a citation if you want. Although it might be better to wait until you develop more than two sentences of content before adding another section. Gab4gab (talk) 13:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Hi The Tips of Apmh! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, User talk page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi The Tips of Apmh! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, help for page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi The Tips of Apmh! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, vote to merge?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi The Tips of Apmh! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft for already existing article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi The Tips of Apmh! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Notes?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, I just submitted an Articles for Deletion request against Draft:Queenly due to promotional content, but I now realise it should have been Miscellaneous for Deletion. I think I've undone the original request, but the template is still on the page. Would you mind helping me out in sorting it? I don't commonly use XFD, I'm usually doing antivandalism on Huggle.
Hi The Tips of Apmh! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Archival of talk page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.
Hi The Tips of Apmh! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Disambiguation pages, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.
Talk to john if you doubt his credibility his credentials are bullet proof. Do you think with all the facts behind him. That he'd let false info ride on his page. Contact him if you have questions. Oh and you can watch him on the dick cavett show i think i found it on YouTube his father Rush Glenn Miller also had a mixed race congregation in mississippi during jim crow. . 2603:6080:AE00:36E3:CD9F:47BA:777D:3BEE (talk) 21:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi The Tips of Apmh! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Redlink template?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.
Hi The Tips of Apmh! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Disambiguation, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Many of the sources are borderline on reliability, probably falling on the wrong side of the border. Regardless, there is little to no substantial independent commentary on the video, like a full-length review of it. Maybe there's an existing article this video should be mentioned at instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Face Lift (video) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Face Lift (video), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, The Tips of Apmh!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (talk) 11:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY23:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Recent revert
Your recent revert to my edits at Draft:Mishbahul Islam Mazumder made sense, but I don't know what else I would do. There is no CSD template that would delete a page like this, and I can't just move the page to their user space because their username is all caps. The article very clearly shouldn't be in the draft namespace, but what can we do to remove it, if not CSD A7? Thanks ― Levi_OPTalk18:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
@Levi OP: I don't think a draft can be removed for that reason. Unless there is a Wikipedia guideline that says autobiography drafts should be deleted. Or maybe WP:G10 applies, however the article is not negative in tone. Why do you think the draft should be deleted? --The Tips ofApmh18:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
@Levi OP: While WP:AB does say that writing an article about yourself is strongly discouraged, it does not outright say that it is not allowed. But the draft does fail MOS:I, since it is using first person pronouns. --The Tips ofApmh19:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
So... what do you think we do. I've used csd a7 on pages like this multiple times in the past with nothing being said. If not CSD A7, then what? ― Levi_OPTalk19:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi The Tips of Apmh! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to filter search for userbox?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.
Hey! I noticed that you have a userbox on your userpage stating that you recognize the pun in your name. What is said pun in your username as I don't see what it is. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654515:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Oh. Wouldn't it technically become Yjrtpsfod;pmh (i struggled to think to type that)? Or were you basically changing that to become something more literal and understandable? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654516:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
@Blaze Wolf: If you separate the words (the road is long) and then type the letters one to the right (yjr tpsf od apmh) it gets autocorrected to "the tips of apmh". --The TipsofApmh16:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Same here honestly. I mean, I don't think there's any real issue with their username as long as they aren't trying to impersonate you or make fun of you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654516:09, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi The Tips of Apmh! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Piped links to redirect pages, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.
I’m new to Wikipedia , I see you helped edit my page. Can you explain why it was speedily deleted & how I can publish my page ? I’m just trying to update information on myself , and I can’t figure out how to properly do this ? Malibu310 (talk) 23:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
did you really just threaten to remove me from editing for capitalizing a word? you’ve got to be joking right? it looks terrible and amateurish not capitalized, the title is also capitalized so why wouldn’t it be? stop being ridiculous please. i understand if your life isn’t going super well url, but don’t be taking it out on me. because that’s so incredibly immature and petty to threaten to remove someone for capitalizing a word, get ur stuff together please. thanks ;) Hunterreeeer (talk) 19:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
you threw a “final warning” saying if i continued to make such edits i’d be removed, what do you call it?
you throw a warning for me changing a single letter and call it vandalism/disruptive like come on dude, does changing a single letter make you that upset that you call it disruptive editing / vandalism.
and generally, it should be capitalized as you’re talking about a War. you don’t call it the Boer war, you call it the Boer War, it’s not the Korean war, it’s typed as the Korean War. I was fixing an edit that all other pages have as capitalized, but it’s whatever i respect your opinion and that mine not be correct, just don’t go mindlessly throwing warnings around, thanks :) Hunterreeeer (talk) 22:51, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
@Hunterreeeer: It appears that you have gotten five warnings from four different users, not including me. That's why I gave you a "final warning". Also, I do not know why you are still arguing about "war" being capitalized. Please see this and this which show the general preference to not capitalize "war". --The TipsofApmh23:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
i’m just saying others pages have this, and wonder why you’re making an exception ;) and as i said, i understand my opinion may be wrong, but you don’t need to warn for something so small, stop defending yourself on that.
and also how do i have four warnings, do people seriously throw warnings for such little things, because i was not aware of that, as the only ones i saw that had warnings were yours and another dudes, only others i can think of were that i didn’t reference, but i went and changed them and fixed them if i had noticed, hardly reason for a warning ? Hunterreeeer (talk) 23:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
and also you used the word “preference not to capitalize”, so just bring your opinion, which others vary, hardly a reason for a warning, i’m sure you wouldn’t be happy if you just got thrown a warning for someone’s “preference” on a singular letter Hunterreeeer (talk) 23:08, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
@Hunterreeeer: What bothered me with your edit was how you changed only the first mention of "war in Donbas" and not the other ~10 times it was mentioned uncapitalized. That's why I assumed it was just vandalism.
only saw the one as it was the first few words that anyone reads on the pages and thought it should generally be capitalized (and it’s bolded aswell) but apologies if it upset you. as i said, i respect your opinion on it. but please just don’t go assuming things in bad faith, as that’s not the correct approach. this could have been settled a lot better if you had just asked why i didn’t change the others, which i would have absolutely gone and changed them once you voiced your concern! that would’ve been no problem whatsoever! i just wasn’t aware changing one letter in a bolded title would require going and changing every single other word affiliated with it. Hunterreeeer (talk) 23:21, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
@Hunterreeeer: I agree, I was kind of in a rush when I pressed the warn button. Also, keep in mind that it's not a "if you get warned 5 times you get insta-blocked" kind of thing. In a vacuum, warnings do not mean anything at all. It takes an entire administrator to review your edits and conclude whether you should get blocked or not. The TipsofApmh23:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
i understand and totally get it. i just don’t really enjoy waking up and seeing that i was being warned and reading that if i continue making such edits i get removed, as that’s how it was worded, for changing a single letter nonetheless, without any type of discussion, sorry if i took this out of proportion but you have to understand that it’s extremely frustrating. Hunterreeeer (talk) 23:33, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
@Hunterreeeer: Understandable, I have been warned once before and have had many of my edits reverted. But I also would have preferred if you were more civil and didn't say things like "get ur stuff together please". The TipsofApmh00:22, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
